Disseminating Organizational SBI Services at Trauma Centers
NCT ID: NCT00607620
Last Updated: 2018-03-07
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
878 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-09-30
2013-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Web-Based Training for EAP Alcohol Screening, Brief Intervention, and Refer
NCT02489032
Web Intervention for Concerned Partners to Prevent Service Member Alcohol Abuse Abuse
NCT02073825
Alcohol Screening and Preoperative Intervention Research Study - 2
NCT05783635
Effectiveness of Nurse-Conducted Brief Intervention (NCBI) Supplemented With Mobile for Preventing Alcohol Use Disorders
NCT06652802
Alcohol Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment in a Military Treatment Facility
NCT02228967
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Providers at each intervention trauma center will receive workshop training and ongoing telephone coaching in the delivery of evidence-based motivational interviewing (MI) intervention; MI training will be embedded within evidence-based organizational development activities that aim to facilitate the integration of SBI services into routine trauma center care. Control trauma centers will implement SBI care as usual. The investigation hypothesizes that intervention trauma centers, when compared to control trauma centers, will demonstrate higher quality SBI, as evidenced by greater provider proficiency in SBI delivery, significant reductions in 6- and 12-month post-injury alcohol use in patients receiving SBI, and enhanced organizational acceptance of SBI services. Without DO-SBIS baseline data on SBI services and follow-up RCT data on patient, provider, and organizational outcomes, a critical opportunity to provide empiric support of a historic policy decision to require alcohol services at level I trauma centers could be lost. The DO-SBIS interdisciplinary research group includes trauma surgery opinion leaders who are dedicated to implementing future policy mandates that derive from the DO-SBIS research program. Future mandates will aim to strengthen and refine trauma center delivery of evidence-based SBI services. The dissemination of high quality SBI services at level I trauma centers has the potential to influence alcohol policy in other health care settings nationwide.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
Providers receive training in alcohol screening and brief interventions from study staff in compliance with American College of Surgeons' Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention Mandate
Brief Intervention
Training in brief interventions for alcohol use disorders, with a focus on motivational interviewing
Usual Care
Usual care for alcohol use problems after American College of Surgeons' Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention Mandate
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Brief Intervention
Training in brief interventions for alcohol use disorders, with a focus on motivational interviewing
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* For patient subjects: admitted to trauma centers selected by study, positive blood alcohol levels, able to provide two follow-up contacts
Exclusion Criteria
* For Patients: Patients so severely injured that they cannot participate in study procedures will be excluded;
* Patients who are admitted after self-inflicted injury, or are psychotic and therefore require more intensive acute interventions, will not be included in the study;
* Injured hospitalized prisoners are excluded.
* Children under the age of 18 are excluded.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center
OTHER
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
NIH
University of Washington
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Douglas Zatzick
Professor, Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Douglas F Zatzick, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Washington
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Zatzick D, Donovan DM, Jurkovich G, Gentilello L, Dunn C, Russo J, Wang J, Zatzick CD, Love J, McFadden C, Rivara FP. Disseminating alcohol screening and brief intervention at trauma centers: a policy-relevant cluster randomized effectiveness trial. Addiction. 2014 May;109(5):754-65. doi: 10.1111/add.12492. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
Zatzick D, Palinkas L, Chambers DA, Whiteside L, Moloney K, Engstrom A, Prater L, Russo J, Wang J, Abu K, Iles-Shih M, Bulger E. Integrating pragmatic and implementation science randomized clinical trial approaches: a PRagmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary-2 (PRECIS-2) analysis. Trials. 2023 Apr 21;24(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07313-0.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
30660
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.