The Effects of Aspirin and Acetaminophen on the Stomach in Healthy Volunteers
NCT ID: NCT00594867
Last Updated: 2019-05-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
94 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-12-31
2007-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Many patients often take both of these medications together. While the effects on the stomach lining of each medication, when used alone, are known, the effects of both medications, when used together, are not.
The purpose of this study is to show whether or not the collective effects of both aspirin and acetaminophen, when used together, increase the damage on the stomach lining when compared to either medication alone.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Mechanisms of Action of Acetaminophen
NCT00646906
Dose-related Effect of Aspirin on Laboratory-defined Acetylsalicylic Acid Resistance and Clinical Outcome After Coronary Stenting
NCT00966485
Aspirin in Patients With Myocardial Infarction and Thrombocytopenia
NCT00501345
Effect of Aspirin on Hemostatic and Vascular Function After Live Fire Fighting
NCT01276691
The Effect of Low Dose Aspirin on the Pharmacokinetics of Methotrexate
NCT00464997
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A high proportion of aspirin users also require concomitant use of anti-inflammatory medications for the treatment of pain and arthritis. However, evidence suggests that the risk of developing gastroduodenal ulcers and ulcer complications is significantly increased when aspirin is co-administered with other nonselective NSAIDs. In a previous study, concomitant aspirin (325 mg daily) in healthy subjects taking naproxen (500mg bid) was associated with endoscopic ulcer rates of 27.3% as compared to aspirin alone (7.6%). In a separate and independent trial of similar design, patients using 81 mg of aspirin in conjunction with daily naproxen also resulted in a higher incidence of gastric and duodenal ulcers than aspirin therapy alone. Beyond endoscopic ulcer rates, the risk of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage has been reported to be substantially increased with concurrent administration of low-dose aspirin with nonselective NSAIDS. These data suggest that the gastrointestinal toxicity of combined aspirin with other NSAIDs may be more than additive.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Acetaminophen - 4 grams per day + Placebo
Acetaminophen - 4 grams per day + Placebo
Acetaminophen - 4 grams per day + Placebo
2
Aspirin - 325 mg per day + Placebo
Aspirin - 325 mg per day + Placebo
Aspirin - 325 mg per day + Placebo
3
Acetaminophen 4 gram per day + Aspirin 325 mg per day
Acetaminophen 4 gram per day + Aspirin 325 mg per day
Acetaminophen 4 gram per day + Aspirin 325 mg per day
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Acetaminophen - 4 grams per day + Placebo
Acetaminophen - 4 grams per day + Placebo
Aspirin - 325 mg per day + Placebo
Aspirin - 325 mg per day + Placebo
Acetaminophen 4 gram per day + Aspirin 325 mg per day
Acetaminophen 4 gram per day + Aspirin 325 mg per day
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Have a physical examination which reveals no clinically significant abnormalities at the screening visit.
3. Have fewer than 6 gastric or duodenal erosions visible on nasal endoscopy at Visit 2.
4. If the subject is female and of childbearing potential, she has been using effective contraception since the last date of her menses, will continue to use effective contraception during the study period, is not breast-feeding or lactating at screening and has had a negative urine pregnancy test at screening. Women who have been post-menopausal for less than 2 years will also require a urine pregnancy test at screening.
5. Have provided written informed consent prior for admission to this study.
6. H. pylori negative serologic exam prior to baseline nasal EGD.
Exclusion Criteria
2. History of gastric or intestinal surgery
3. Use of ASA, NSAIDs, coxibs, or acetaminophen at any dose within 2 weeks prior to the randomization visit of the study.
4. Positive FOBT at baseline.
5. Use of over-the-counter or prescription: sucralfate, antacids, H2-receptor antagonists, misoprostol, or proton pump inhibitors 4 weeks prior to enrollment and/or during the study
6. A known allergy to the topical anesthetic, lidocaine.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Illinois at Chicago
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
University of Illinois at Chicago
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jay L Goldstein, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Illinois at Chicago
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Illinois Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Antithrombotic Trialists' Collaboration. Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ. 2002 Jan 12;324(7329):71-86. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7329.71.
Patrono C, Garcia Rodriguez LA, Landolfi R, Baigent C. Low-dose aspirin for the prevention of atherothrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 1;353(22):2373-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra052717. No abstract available.
Weil J, Colin-Jones D, Langman M, Lawson D, Logan R, Murphy M, Rawlins M, Vessey M, Wainwright P. Prophylactic aspirin and risk of peptic ulcer bleeding. BMJ. 1995 Apr 1;310(6983):827-30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6983.827.
Derry S, Loke YK. Risk of gastrointestinal haemorrhage with long term use of aspirin: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2000 Nov 11;321(7270):1183-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7270.1183.
Goldstein JL, Lowry SC, Lanza FL, Schwartz HI, Dodge WE. The impact of low-dose aspirin on endoscopic gastric and duodenal ulcer rates in users of a non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug or a cyclo-oxygenase-2-selective inhibitor. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 May 15;23(10):1489-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02912.x.
Sorensen HT, Mellemkjaer L, Blot WJ, Nielsen GL, Steffensen FH, McLaughlin JK, Olsen JH. Risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding associated with use of low-dose aspirin. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Sep;95(9):2218-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02248.x.
Cryer B, Feldman M. Cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2 selectivity of widely used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Am J Med. 1998 May;104(5):413-21. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(98)00091-6.
Lanza FL, Codispoti JR, Nelson EB. An endoscopic comparison of gastroduodenal injury with over-the-counter doses of ketoprofen and acetaminophen. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998 Jul;93(7):1051-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.00327.x.
Jick H. Effects of aspirin and acetaminophen in gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Results from the Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program. Arch Intern Med. 1981 Feb 23;141(3 Spec No):316-21. doi: 10.1001/archinte.141.3.316.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2006-0459
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.