Intranasal Steroids and Oxymetazoline in Allergic Rhinitis

NCT ID: NCT00584987

Last Updated: 2013-12-17

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

64 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-06-30

Study Completion Date

2009-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

We hypothesize that once daily use of oxymetazoline will not cause significant rhinitis medicamentosa and that the combination of fluticasone furoate plus oxymetazoline leads to faster relief of nasal congestion secondary to perennial allergic rhinitis than the use of fluticasone furoate alone.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

We performed a 6-week, 4-group, parallel, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, clinical trial in 60 patients with perennial allergic rhinitis. After an initial screening with an allergy questionnaire and skin puncture testing to confirm an allergic response to a perennial allergen (cat, dog, dust mite, indoor mold), qualified individuals were randomized into 1 of 4 treatment groups. The 4 groups received the following treatments: placebo, OXY (0.05%, 2 puffs in each nostril every evening), FF nasal spray (110 mg per day), and FF nasal spray plus OXY (FF/OXY). All participants received 2 nasal sprays at night, with 1 spray containing FF or its placebo, the other oxymetazoline or its placebo. The nasal sprays were labeled with participant code numbers, and the investigator assigned participants in a sequential randomized fashion to a study code number in blocks of 4. Dropouts were replaced until 60 subjects were randomized. Replacement subjects were assigned the next sequential treatment. Thus, the number of subjects in each group was not exactly 15.

Eligible participants completed the Rhinitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) and underwent measurement of nasal volume by acoustic rhinometry before starting the study. Participants were instructed to keep a diary of daily symptoms, nasal peak inspiratory flow (NPIF) meter readings, and medication use during the study; no rescue medications were allowed. The severity of sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and other symptoms was recorded in the morning (reflective of symptoms overnight) and evening (reflective of daytime symptoms) on a 0 to 3 scale. Intake of the study medication was performed once daily, at night, after recording of symptoms and NPIF values. Subjects returned to the nasal laboratory every 2 weeks for a total of 4 weeks for review of the symptom diaries, replacement of medications, performance of acoustic rhinometry, and completion of the RQLQ. After the fourth week, participants stopped treatment, returned medication, and continued with the clinical trial for 2 additional weeks. During this time, they maintained symptom diaries and NPIF measurements twice daily. At the end of the 2-week period, participants returned to the nasal laboratory to perform a final acoustic rhinometry, complete an RQLQ survey, and return the diaries.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Allergic Rhinitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Placebo FF + Placebo OXY

Placebo Fluticasone furoate + Placebo Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo Fluticasone furoate

Intervention Type DRUG

2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm

Placebo Oxymetazoline

Intervention Type DRUG

2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm

FF + Placebo OXY

Fluticasone furoate + Placebo Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fluticasone furoate

Intervention Type DRUG

2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm

Placebo Oxymetazoline

Intervention Type DRUG

2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm

Placebo FF + OXY

Placebo Fluticasone furoate + Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Placebo Fluticasone furoate

Intervention Type DRUG

2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm

Oxymetazoline

Intervention Type DRUG

2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm

FF + OXY

Fluticasone furoate + Oxymetazoline, 2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fluticasone furoate

Intervention Type DRUG

2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm

Oxymetazoline

Intervention Type DRUG

2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fluticasone furoate

2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo Fluticasone furoate

2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm

Intervention Type DRUG

Oxymetazoline

2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo Oxymetazoline

2 puffs of each nasal spray in each nostril in the pm

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Veramyst Oxymetazoline hydrochloride

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Males and females between 18 and 55 years of age.
2. History of perennial allergic rhinitis.
3. Positive skin test to dust mite, dog, cat or indoor mold antigen.
4. And a combined nasal morning and evening score of ≥4 for nasal congestion in the day preceding entry

Exclusion Criteria

1. Physical signs or symptoms suggestive of renal, hepatic or cardiovascular disease.
2. Pregnant or lactating women.
3. Subjects treated with systemic steroids during the previous 30 days.
4. Subjects treated with topical (inhaled, intranasal or intraocular) steroids, Nasalcrom or Opticrom during the previous 30 days.
5. Subjects treated with oral antihistamine/decongestants during the previous seven days.
6. Subjects treated with topical (intranasal or intraocular) antihistamine/decongestants during the previous 3 days.
7. Subjects treated with immunotherapy and are escalating their dose.
8. Subjects on chronic anti-asthma medications.
9. Subjects with polyps in the nose or a significantly displaced septum.
10. Upper respiratory infection within 14 days of study start.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

GlaxoSmithKline

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Chicago

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Robert Naclerio

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Robert M Naclerio, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Chicago

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Baroody FM, Brown D, Gavanescu L, DeTineo M, Naclerio RM. Oxymetazoline adds to the effectiveness of fluticasone furoate in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Apr;127(4):927-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.01.037. Epub 2011 Mar 5.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21377716 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

15059B

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id