Azelastine Fluticasone Combination vs. Fluticasone

NCT ID: NCT00845598

Last Updated: 2012-06-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-08-31

Study Completion Date

2011-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to see how a combination spray of azelastine and fluticasone (antihistamine and steroid) compares with a steroid nasal spray (fluticasone) alone in allergic rhinitis i.e. does azelastine permit the use of lesser steroid dose (steroid sparing effect) to achieve the same benefit.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a major chronic respiratory disease with a prevalence approaching nearly 25% in the worldwide population.Allergic Rhinitis is a common and relatively undiagnosed public health problem and has been reported as being one of the ten most common causes for outpatient attendances to the general practitioner. Long term untreated allergic rhinitis may lead on to asthma. When exposed to allergens (pollen, house dust mite etc) in the atmosphere, the mast cells in the nose burst and an inflammatory response is triggered and patients experience sneezing, itching, blocked nose and running. These allergens may be used as provocation agents to recreate the disease symptoms to confirm the diagnosis of which allergens one is allergic to. However, there is a risk of allergic reactions in doing so. Adenosine monophosphate (AMP)achieves the same goal by stimulating the mast cells and causing them to burst without actually the risks of allergen provocation tests. Such tests are now commonplace in research and clinical medicine. Nasal steroids are considered to be the most potent medications for allergic rhinitis, particularly nasal blockage. Nasal antihistamines are also available but they act mainly to limit nasal running, itching and sneezing and have lesser effect on blockage. The other advantage is that they act very quickly while steroids take at least 72 hours to begin acting and weeks to achieve maximal benefit. Finally, they are free of significant short and long term side effects. Having said that nasal steroids are very safe and unlike inhaled or oral steroids have not been shown to cause systemic side effects in adults. Therefore, it is interesting to see if a combination of an antihistamine and nasal steroid would add their good qualities mentioned above and by the act of reducing the dose of steroid reduce their side effects. To do this we will use nasal AMP challenge as an outcome measure as we have done research studies for over a decade with. We will look at noninvasive nasal airflow parameters, nasal nitric oxide levels, and for safety we will look at the overnight urinary cortisol and creatinine ratio which is the most sensitive and noninvasive test of urine to quantify how much steroid has been absorbed in the blood stream.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Allergic Rhinitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Azelastine Fluticasone

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Azelastine , fluticasone

Intervention Type DRUG

Azelastine Hydrochloride BP 0.10% w/v AND Fluticasone propionate BP 0.0357% w/v as combination

1 squirt in each nostril twice daily

Fluticasone propionate

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fluticasone propionate

Intervention Type DRUG

Fluticasone propionate 0.05% w/w 2 squirts in each nostril (50 μg per squirt)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Azelastine , fluticasone

Azelastine Hydrochloride BP 0.10% w/v AND Fluticasone propionate BP 0.0357% w/v as combination

1 squirt in each nostril twice daily

Intervention Type DRUG

Fluticasone propionate

Fluticasone propionate 0.05% w/w 2 squirts in each nostril (50 μg per squirt)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male of Female aged 18-65 years.
* Persistent allergic rhinitis with or without asthma.
* Atopy to at least one allergen on SPT.
* Ability to give a written informed consent.
* Ability and willingness to comply with the requirements of the protocol.

Exclusion Criteria

* Recent respiratory tract/sinus infection within the last 2 months. .
* Pregnancy, planned pregnancy or lactation.
* Known or suspected hypersensitivity to any of the IMP's.
* Concomitant use of medicines (prescribed, OTC or herbal) like alpha blockers that may interfere with the trial.
* Nasal Polyposis grade 2+, Deviated nasal septum ≥ 50%
* The use of oral corticosteroids within the last 3 months.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Dundee

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Brian J Lipworth

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sriram Vaidyanathan, MBBS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Dundee

Brian Lipworth, MD, FRCP

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Dundee

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ninewells Hospital and Medical School

Dundee, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Perth Royal Infirmary

Perth, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bousquet J, Van Cauwenberge P, Khaltaev N; Aria Workshop Group; World Health Organization. Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001 Nov;108(5 Suppl):S147-334. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.118891. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11707753 (View on PubMed)

Nassef M, Shapiro G, Casale TB; Respiratory and Allergic Disease Foundation. Identifying and managing rhinitis and its subtypes: allergic and nonallergic components--a consensus report and materials from the Respiratory and Allergic Disease Foundation. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Dec;22(12):2541-8. doi: 10.1185/030079906x158057.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17265594 (View on PubMed)

Nolte H, Nepper-Christensen S, Backer V. Unawareness and undertreatment of asthma and allergic rhinitis in a general population. Respir Med. 2006 Feb;100(2):354-62. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.05.012. Epub 2005 Jul 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16005621 (View on PubMed)

Gupta R, Sheikh A, Strachan DP, Anderson HR. Burden of allergic disease in the UK: secondary analyses of national databases. Clin Exp Allergy. 2004 Apr;34(4):520-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.1935.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15080802 (View on PubMed)

Weiner JM, Abramson MJ, Puy RM. Intranasal corticosteroids versus oral H1 receptor antagonists in allergic rhinitis: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 1998 Dec 12;317(7173):1624-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7173.1624.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9848901 (View on PubMed)

Meltzer EO, Weiler JM, Dockhorn RJ, Widlitz MD, Freitag JJ. Azelastine nasal spray in the management of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Ann Allergy. 1994 Apr;72(4):354-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7908778 (View on PubMed)

Newson-Smith G, Powell M, Baehre M, Garnham SP, MacMahon MT. A placebo controlled study comparing the efficacy of intranasal azelastine and beclomethasone in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1997;254(5):236-41. doi: 10.1007/BF00874095.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9195148 (View on PubMed)

Berger WE, Fineman SM, Lieberman P, Miles RM. Double-blind trials of azelastine nasal spray monotherapy versus combination therapy with loratadine tablets and beclomethasone nasal spray in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Rhinitis Study Groups. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1999 Jun;82(6):535-41. doi: 10.1016/s1081-1206(10)63161-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10400480 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

VAI04

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

DYmista NAsal Spray in CHInese Patients
NCT03599791 COMPLETED PHASE3