A Prospective, Randomized TrialComparing Oral N-Acetylcysteine and Intravenous Sodium Bicarbonate

NCT ID: NCT00579995

Last Updated: 2023-09-21

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

41 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-05-01

Study Completion Date

2010-04-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of oral N-acetylcysteine and intravenous sodium bicarbonate for the prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy (CIN) after cardiac catheterization.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

It is thought that N-acetylcysteine may reduce the ability of generated oxygen free radicals to damage cells by scavenging them. N-acetylcysteine may also increase the biologic effects of nitric oxide by combining with nitric oxide to form S-nitrosothiol, a more stable form and potent vasodilator. It also increases the expression of nitric oxide synthesis and may improve blood flow. Oxidants activate a signal-transduction cascade and molecular response that may initiate the cell-death pathway. These pathways seem to be sensitive to the redox state of the cell and are inhibited by N-acetylcysteine, which promotes pathways that lead to repair and survival whenever cells are under oxidant stress.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Nephropathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

N-Acetylcysteine

Oral N-Acetylcysteine 600 mg

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Oral N-Acetylcysteine

Intervention Type DRUG

600 milligrams (mg)

Sodium Bicarbonate

Sodium bicarbonate 3 milliliter per kilogram per hour (3 mL/kg/hr) infused at 1 mL/kg/hr for 6 hours post-procedure

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sodium Bicarbonate

Intervention Type DRUG

3 milliliters per kilogram per hour (mL/kg/hr) for one hour pre-procedure and infused at 1mL/kg/hr for 6 hours post-procedure

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Oral N-Acetylcysteine

600 milligrams (mg)

Intervention Type DRUG

Sodium Bicarbonate

3 milliliters per kilogram per hour (mL/kg/hr) for one hour pre-procedure and infused at 1mL/kg/hr for 6 hours post-procedure

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

N-Acetyl-L-Cysteine Sodium hydrogen carbonate sodium acid carbonate baking soda

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Baseline serum creatinine or
* Calculated creatinine
* Stable Renal Function
* Left Ventricular ejection fraction
* Non-pregnant, non-lactating females (all women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test. No contraception will be required
* Able to sign informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Acute renal failure
* History of Kidney transplant
* Currently receiving N-acetylcysteine

\_ Contraindication of hypersensitivity to N-acetylcysteine or sodium bicarbonate
* Left ventricular ejection fraction
* Pregnant, lactating females
* Allergy to contrast dye
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Nebraska

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Scott Shurmur, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Nebraska

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Unversity of Nebraska Medical Center

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0120-05-FB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.