A Personalized Feedback Intervention for Problem Gamblers
NCT ID: NCT00578357
Last Updated: 2011-07-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
209 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-12-31
2011-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Three-month, six-month, and 12-month follow-up surveys will be conducted by mail to assess gambling over the intervening periods. Collaterals will be requested as part of the 12-month follow-up and interviewed by telephone. Gambling at three- six- and 12-months will be compared between the groups. Change in perception of gambling norms and sex will be tested as mediational and moderating variables.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Susceptibility to Pathological Gambling
NCT01528982
Check Yourself Study
NCT02360410
Positive Feedback vs. No-Feedback Games for Behavioral Change
NCT06025838
Non-cardiac Chest Pain: Effect of Cognitive Therapy Administered as Guided Self-help
NCT03096925
Electronic Self-management Resource Training for Mental Health
NCT01304862
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hypothesis 1: Problem gamblers who receive the personalized feedback intervention will reduce their gambling more than problem gamblers who do not receive any intervention (waiting list control condition) by a six-month follow-up.Hypothesis 2: The effect of the intervention will be sustained through the 12-month follow-up.Hypothesis 3 (mediator hypothesis): Respondents in the intervention condition who report greater reductions in their estimates about how much others gamble between baseline and three-month follow-up will demonstrate more improvement in gambling outcomes at six-month follow-up, compared to respondents in the intervention condition who report smaller reductions in their perceived gambling norms.
The design of this study is a randomized (modified) waiting list controlled study. Subjects will be recruited via a random digit dialing telephone screener of the Ontario population. Respondents who are identified by the screener as problem gamblers and who indicate an interest in receiving, at some time in the future, a free computerized summary comparing their gambling to that of other Canadians, will be asked if they will take part in a study to "help us develop and evaluate self-help materials for gamblers." They will be told that the materials and the three-, six- and 12-month follow-up surveys would be mailed to them. Compensation is provided for the completion of each survey.
Provision of name and address will constitute consent. Subjects will be randomly assigned to condition - those in the intervention condition will be sent their personalized feedback - those in the control condition will be asked to tell us what they think should be included in self-help materials for gamblers. (Control subjects will receive the personalized feedback after the six-month follow-up.)
3-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up questionnaires will be sent to all subjects.
On the 12-month follow-up subjects will be asked to provide the name, address and telephone number of a collateral.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
immediate intervention
personalized feedback intervention
personalized feedback will be sent to participants after they complete and return self-help materials/questionnaires
2
note: participants in this arm will receive the intervention after the 6-month follow-up (serving as control during the trial)
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
personalized feedback intervention
personalized feedback will be sent to participants after they complete and return self-help materials/questionnaires
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* encompassing the full range of potential problems from moderate problem gambling to gambling dependence as defined by the Canadian Problem Gambling Index (CPGI score of 3 or more)
* spent at least $100.00 in the past year on gambling
* will indicate an interest in self-help materials for problem gamblers.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John Cunningham, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cunningham JA, Hodgins DC, Toneatto T, Murphy M. A randomized controlled trial of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031586. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
212/2007
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.