Hospital Design and Risk of Nosocomial Infections: A Prospective Controlled Trial
NCT ID: NCT00563186
Last Updated: 2018-10-23
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
1514 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-06-30
2010-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Microbiological Assessment of Air and Surfaces of Operation Rooms in Assuit University Hospitals
NCT05083819
Microbiologic Contamination of Home Non Invasive Ventilators
NCT03809832
Potential Risk for Bacterial Contamination in Ventilator Systems
NCT03359148
Air Purifiers in Classrooms for Infection Control - a Pilot Study
NCT06374316
Comparision of Different Methods of Enviromennt Disinfection
NCT02795091
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
We therefore propose to conduct a prospective, controlled investigator blinded trial of the impact of DCECs on specific HAIs and ARO colonization. We propose to allocate general medical patients, with an allocation scheme that incorporates randomness, to one of 2 types of medical wards at the FMC, either "historic design" wards (ie control wards in the non-renovated portions of FMC or Unit 36 (the experimental new design ward). The medical wards are very similar with respect to the patient mix, acuity of care, medical staff, nursing staff and skill mix, educational levels, housekeeping and levels of knowledge about infection control practices but differ in design. Variables which may otherwise have confounded the outcome of hospital acquired infections/colonizations may be controlled allowing the effect of the differences in design, construction and engineering controls to be studied. The older design wards have predominantly 4-bed and some 2-bed rooms with shared bathrooms, less space and fewer handwashing sinks/patient. The study will require 9750 patient days of observation in the "historic design"wards and 19,500 patient days of observation in Unit 36 to ensure 80% statistical power to detect a 60% difference in the rates of incident cases of selected HAIs and ARO colonizations (the primary outcome measure) with an α level of 0.05 assuming that incident cases in each unit follow Poisson distribution based on well established historic trends on these units.
In addition we propose to add a nested mixed methods social science study within the construct of the prospective study to understand the fit between the health care workers and the physical environment. In recognition that the proposed intervention may be defined as a "complex intervention" with HAIs affected by many factors related to physical plant design, organizational factors, and health care worker practices, it was considered prudent to measure and describe worker and organizational factors on the medical inpatient care units included in the proposed intervention.
Our proposed study is being done with the collaboration and support of both the Operations and Planning \& Capital Development portfolios of the Calgary Health Region. The Region is in the throes of a major expansion with over $1 billion of new capital health care developments and the addition of over 700 new beds by 2010. The finding of favorable outcomes on the medical ward with its special design, construction and engineered controls in a well designed prospective study of this nature would be the first of its kind and has the potential to change the fundamental design of new medical wards in the Calgary Health Region and in other jurisdictions within Canada.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A
Admission to a novel hospital ward (e.g. abundance of sinks, predominance (80%) of private rooms, absence of shared bathrooms, absence of curtains)
Admission to a novel hospital ward
Hospital admission to a ward with novel infection control design features (e.g., abundance of sinks, predominance (80%) of private rooms, absence of shared bathrooms, absence of curtains)
B
Hospital admission to a ward with traditional design features (eg. lack of sinks, predominance of 4-bed rooms \[80%\], shared bathrooms, curtains present)
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Admission to a novel hospital ward
Hospital admission to a ward with novel infection control design features (e.g., abundance of sinks, predominance (80%) of private rooms, absence of shared bathrooms, absence of curtains)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* are admitted via the emergency room
* are admitted from the urgent assessment clinic or the community
Exclusion Criteria
* require telemetry monitoring of their cardiac rhythm (a specific medical situation that dictates need for admission to a nonUnit 36 bed).
* have other clinical circumstances (eg clinical instability) mandating a physician to indicate clinical preference for admission of the patient to a specific location in the hospital
* are admitted from the intensive care unit or another hospital ward
* are admitted for less than 48 hours
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Calgary Health Region
OTHER
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
OTHER_GOV
Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research
OTHER
University of Calgary
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. John Conly
Dr John Conly
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John M Conly, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Calgary
William A Ghali, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Calgary
Manuel Mah, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Calgary Health Region
Donna Holton, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Calgary Health Region
Elizabeth A Henderson, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Calgary
Peter Faris, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Calgary
Jean Wallace, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Calgary
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Foothills Hospital
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Website for the Medical Ward of the 21st Century Initiative.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CIHR-PHE-81963
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.