Safety and Efficacy of AST-120 Compared to Lactulose in Patients With Hepatic Encephalopathy

NCT ID: NCT00558038

Last Updated: 2014-05-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-09-30

Study Completion Date

2009-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the experimental drug AST-120 compared to lactulose in patients with mild hepatic encephalopathy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a multi-center, open-label, four week trial comparing AST-120 to lactulose in patients with mild (Stage 1-2) hepatic encephalopathy.

Patients will be randomized into two groups:

* Lactulose
* AST-120

Patients meeting the inclusion criteria will take either AST-120 or lactulose for 4 weeks (28 days). AST-120 will be distributed in 2 gram sachets to be taken four times daily. Lactulose will be taken in the same formulation, at the same dose and frequency as previously prescribed for the individual patient.

Lactulose naïve patients who are randomized to lactulose will receive an initial dose of 30cc twice a day. The dose should be titrated at the discretion of the investigator until the patient is experiencing 2-3 soft stools per day.

Patients randomized to AST-120 will receive 2 grams four times a day for the duration of the study. Titration of AST-120 will NOT be allowed.

Patients will be evaluated throughout the study for efficacy and safety. A follow-up visit will be scheduled 1 week after the end of the 4 week treatment period.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatic Encephalopathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

lactulose

Intervention Type DRUG

lactulose

2

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

AST-120

Intervention Type DRUG

AST-120

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

AST-120

AST-120

Intervention Type DRUG

lactulose

lactulose

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Chronulac, Constilac, Constulose, Duphalac, Evalose

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with End Stage Liver Disease secondary to any cause (patients who have undergone portosystemic shunting (TIPS) procedure \> 3 months prior to randomization can be included)
* Lactulose naïve patients or patients currently on an established dose of lactulose
* MELD score ≤ 15 (MELD score up to 20 is allowable if it has remained stable for at least 3 months)
* Meet the criteria for Stage 1-2 hepatic encephalopathy according to the Westhaven Scale
* Patients must have discontinued rifaximin or other oral antibiotics for at least 48 hours prior to randomization
* Able and willing to comply with all protocol procedures for the planned duration of the study
* Able and willing to understand, sign and date an informed consent document, and authorize access to protected health information
* Have a person (spouse, relative, or friend) willing to accompany the patient to the study visits (patients in this condition are not recommended to drive a vehicle)
* Females must be postmenopausal, surgically incapable of bearing children, or practicing a reliable method of birth control (intrauterine devices, spermicide and barrier). Partner/spouse sterility may also qualify at the investigator's discretion. Females of child-bearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at baseline.

Note: Patients already on lactulose and randomized to AST-120 will stop taking lactulose on the day they begin taking AST-120.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients whose condition necessitates continuous administration of antibiotics (e.g. rifaximin, neomycin, metronidazole)
* Patients undergoing chemotherapy for treatment of cancer (patients with hepatocellular carcinoma being treated by methods other than chemotherapy may be enrolled)
* Patients who require continued treatment with narcotics or sedatives
* Patients who have active GI bleeding
* Patients who have an active infection
* Patients who have signs and symptoms of severe dehydration
* Poor tolerability of venipuncture or lack of adequate venous access for required blood sampling
* Unable to attend all visits required by the protocol
* Female patients must be EXCLUDED if they are pregnant, breast feeding, planning to become pregnant during the study or using hormonal contraception as their only method of birth control
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ocera Therapeutics

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Paul Pockros, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Scripps Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Cedars Sinai Medical Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Scripps Clinic

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Veterans Medical Center San Diego

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Washington Hospital Center - MedStar Research Institute

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Digestive Healthcare of Georgia

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

University of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Tulane University Health Sciences Center

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

University of Massachusetts Medical School

Worchester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Weill Medical College of Cornell

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Mount Sinai School of Medicine

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Baylor University Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Baylor University Medical Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

St. Luke's Advanced Liver Therapies / St. Luke's Texas Liver Coalition - Baylor College of Medicine

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Metropolitan Research

Fairfax, Virginia, United States

Site Status

McGuire VA Medical Center

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AST015

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.