Modern Ultrasound Techniques in the Evaluation of Cerebral Venous Sinuses in Neonates

NCT ID: NCT00555932

Last Updated: 2015-05-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

58 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-05-31

Study Completion Date

2008-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Our overall aim is to examine if ultrasound is as accurate as MRI and/or CT in the evaluation of dural venous sinuses. We hypothesize that sonography will be accurate (accuracy \>80%) for diagnosing specific anatomic findings of dural venous sinuses.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Cranial ultrasound is an established technique for evaluation of the neonatal brain. However its role in the evaluation of cerebral dural venous sinuses in neonates has not been established. It is very important to evaluate the cerebral dural venous sinuses, as cerebral sinovenous thrombosis (CSVT) is an increasingly recognized condition in neonates.

There is an obvious clinical need for systematically evaluating the role of ultrasound with doppler in the evaluation of cerebral venous sinuses. Advances in diagnostic imaging have led to rapid clinical implementation of newer technologies like MR and CT for evaluation of venous sinuses. However technological advances in older imaging methods like ultrasound which have advantages of being non-invasive and being performed at the bedside have not been evaluated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intracranial Thrombosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

The research head ultrasound (HUS) will be performed at the bedside in the Neonatal Unit. The ultrasound examination will be performed within 10 hours time window of the MR and or CT study.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ultrasound

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

All the studies will be performed with the portable ultrasound machine used on a regular basis in the neonatal care unit.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ultrasound

All the studies will be performed with the portable ultrasound machine used on a regular basis in the neonatal care unit.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. All neonates (up to 28 days old) and preterm infants, hospitalized at HSC who need clinically indicated brain MR and MRV as part of their diagnostic workup. Clinical indications for MR could include birth asphyxia, seizures, irritability, lethargy, abnormal neurological examination, etc.
2. Neonates and preterm infants \& who are clinically considered stable to undergo the ultrasound study. This will be determined at the bedside by the neonatology team in attendance.
3. Where consent is available from parents.
4. Only neonates and preterm infants who have undergone a technically adequate MRI study which includes vascular MR venography sequences or CT with contrast will be included. Assessments for technically adequacy will be made by the technologist or the supervising radiologist, as per clinical protocols currently used in the department of diagnostic imaging. This will be determined by referring to notes made on the request form and also by direct communication between the supervising radiologist and team members obtaining consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Vital signs will be monitored in the usual manner by the nurses in attendance in the neonatal unit. If the neonate is unstable, an ultrasound study will not be done.
2. If after starting the ultrasound, any signs of instability are noted during the study, the ultrasound study will discontinued.
3. If consent from parent or guardian is not available, the research ultrasound study will not be done.
4. If the ultrasound cannot be done within a 10 hours window of the CT or MR study (due to technical problems with machine or skilled personnel not being available).
5. Neonates \& preterm infants who have undergone technically inadequate MR and/or CT will not be included. Such technical inadequacy will be determined by referring to notes made by the technologist on the request form and by direct communication with the supervising radiologist.
6. Neonates \& preterm infants undergoing repeat CT and/or MRs will be excluded from the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Hour

Maximum Eligible Age

28 Days

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Hospital for Sick Children

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Manohar Shroff

Chief, Diagnostic Imaging, Pediatric Neuroradiologist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Manohar Shroff

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Hospital for Sick Children

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Hospital for Sick Children

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22532234

Link to final publication abstract

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1000010745

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Fetoscopic Meningomyelocele Repair Study
NCT02230072 COMPLETED PHASE1