A Study of the Safety and Tolerability of Pimavanserin (ACP-103) in Patients With Parkinson's Disease Psychosis

NCT ID: NCT00550238

Last Updated: 2019-06-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

459 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-07-31

Study Completion Date

2018-05-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To assess the long-term safety and tolerability of ACP-103 in subjects with Parkinson's disease psychosis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study did not have a fixed duration, and the duration of individual subject participation was determined based on investigator assessment of subject tolerability and continued benefit until such time as either the drug was commercially available in the US, or an alternate treatment extension was available in non-US regions. For this reason, no subjects, therefore, were considered to have "completed" the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Parkinson's Disease Psychosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pimavanserin tartrate (ACP-103)

Tablets taken once daily by mouth for as long as ACP-103 is considered to be tolerated and beneficial to subjects

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pimavanserin tartrate (ACP-103)

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets taken once daily by mouth for as long as ACP-103 is considered to be tolerated and beneficial to subjects

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pimavanserin tartrate (ACP-103)

Tablets taken once daily by mouth for as long as ACP-103 is considered to be tolerated and beneficial to subjects

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject has completed the treatment period of a previous blinded study of pimavanserin
* The subject is willing and able to provide consent
* Caregiver is willing and able to accompany the subject to all visits

Exclusion Criteria

* Subject has current evidence of a serious and or unstable cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, renal, hematologic or other medical disorder
* Subject is judged by the Investigator to be inappropriate for the study
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Gilbert, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Berkeley, California, United States

Site Status

Carson, California, United States

Site Status

Fountain Valley, California, United States

Site Status

Fresno, California, United States

Site Status

Irvine, California, United States

Site Status

La Habra, California, United States

Site Status

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Laguna Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Loma Linda, California, United States

Site Status

Oxnard, California, United States

Site Status

Pasadena, California, United States

Site Status

Reseda, California, United States

Site Status

Sunnyvale, California, United States

Site Status

Ventura, California, United States

Site Status

Englewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Danbury, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Fairfield, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Farmington, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Boca Raton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Bradenton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Deerfield Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Naples, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ormond Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Panama City, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pompano Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Port Charlotte, Florida, United States

Site Status

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Glenview, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Scarborough, Maine, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Clinton Township, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

East Lansing, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Roseville, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Traverse City, Michigan, United States

Site Status

West Bloomfield, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Columbia, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Missoula, Montana, United States

Site Status

Toms River, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Commack, New York, United States

Site Status

Kingston, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

New Bern, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Salisbury, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Greensburg, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Brentwood, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Alexandria, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Roanoke, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Kirkland, Washington, United States

Site Status

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Roeselare, , Belgium

Site Status

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Pessac, , France

Site Status

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Bangalore, , India

Site Status

Chennai, , India

Site Status

Hyderabad, , India

Site Status

Madurai, , India

Site Status

Mangalore, , India

Site Status

Mangalore, , India

Site Status

Mumbai, , India

Site Status

Mumbai, , India

Site Status

Pune, , India

Site Status

Pune, , India

Site Status

Visakhapatnam, , India

Site Status

Chieti, , Italy

Site Status

Grosseto, , Italy

Site Status

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Katowice, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Coimbra, , Portugal

Site Status

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Kazan', , Russia

Site Status

Kirov, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Pyatigorsk, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Samara, , Russia

Site Status

Smolensk, , Russia

Site Status

Belgrade, , Serbia

Site Status

Novi Sad, , Serbia

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kiev, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kiev, , Ukraine

Site Status

Luhansk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Vinnitsia, , Ukraine

Site Status

Barnsley, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Blackburn, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Newcastle, , United Kingdom

Site Status

North Shields, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Austria Belgium Canada France India Italy Poland Portugal Russia Serbia Sweden Ukraine United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mathis MV, Muoio BM, Andreason P, Avila AM, Farchione T, Atrakchi A, Temple RJ. The US Food and Drug Administration's Perspective on the New Antipsychotic Pimavanserin. J Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;78(6):e668-e673. doi: 10.4088/JCP.16r11119.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28493654 (View on PubMed)

Ballard C, Isaacson S, Mills R, Williams H, Corbett A, Coate B, Pahwa R, Rascol O, Burn DJ. Impact of Current Antipsychotic Medications on Comparative Mortality and Adverse Events in People With Parkinson Disease Psychosis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Oct 1;16(10):898.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.06.021. Epub 2015 Aug 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26239690 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ACP-103-015

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.