Study to Evaluate Symptoms in Patients Treated With Nebivolol or Metoprolol Extended-release (ER) for Hypertension

NCT ID: NCT00547300

Last Updated: 2019-05-21

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

49 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-10-31

Study Completion Date

2008-01-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study was to compare the tolerability of nebivolol to metoprolol ER in a general population of patients with mild to moderate hypertension receiving hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ)

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study was an 18-week study to evaluate the tolerability of nebivolol compared to metoprolol ER in outpatients with mild to moderate hypertension taking HCTZ. It is a multi-center, randomized, double blind (DB), active-control, parallel-group study, starting with a 4-week HCTZ run-in phase, followed by a 12-week DB treatment phase. Patients meeting the entry criteria at the end of run-in are randomized to one of two treatment groups, nebivolol or metoprolol ER. Up-titration of dose of study drug will occur if needed during the first 4 weeks of the DB phase, after which there is an 8-week stable-dose period of treatment. A 2-week double-blind withdrawal phase follows, during which tapering off study drug occurs.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypertension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Nebivolol

Nebivolol 5 mg, 10 mg or 20 mg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Nebivolol

Intervention Type DRUG

Nebivolol once daily, oral administration

Metoprolol ER

Metoprolol ER 50 mg, 100 mg or 200 mg

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Metoprolol ER

Intervention Type DRUG

Metoprolol ER once daily, oral administration

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Metoprolol ER

Metoprolol ER once daily, oral administration

Intervention Type DRUG

Nebivolol

Nebivolol once daily, oral administration

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female, ambulatory outpatients
* History of hypertension being treated with two medications, one of which must be HCTZ and the other of which must not be a beta-blocker or clonidine
* SBP of 135-155 mm Hg and/or DBP of \>85 mm Hg at screening (Visit 1)
* SBP of 140-165 mm Hg and DBP \> 90 mmHg at randomization (Visit 3)

Exclusion Criteria

* Treatment with a beta-blocker or clonidine within 6 months of screening (Visit 1)
* Clinically significant respiratory disease (e.g., bronchial asthma, reactive airways disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)
* Coronary artery disease requiring treatment with a calcium channel blocker or nitrates
* Clinically significant cardiovascular disease (e.g., myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular event, significant arrhythmia) within 6 months of screening (Visit 1)
* History of severe mental illness (including Major Depressive Disorder, psychosis, dementia, bipolar disorder) within 6 months of screening (Visit 1)
* Use of antipsychotic medication (e.g., dopamine receptor antagonists, serotonin dopamine receptor antagonists) or antidepressants
* Diabetes mellitus, type I or II
* Participation in a previous investigational study of nebivolol at any time
* Receipt of treatment with an investigational study drug within 30 days of screening (Visit 1)
* History of hypersensitivity to nebivolol, metoprolol ER, other beta-blockers, HCTZ, or other sulfonamide-derived drugs
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mylan Laboratories

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Forest Laboratories

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Forest Research Institute 014

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Forest Research Institute 028

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Forest Research Institute 054

Encinitas, California, United States

Site Status

Forest Research Institute 025

Roseville, California, United States

Site Status

Forest Research Institute 013

Tustin, California, United States

Site Status

Forest Research Institute 053

Vista, California, United States

Site Status

Forest Research Institute 052

Walnut Creek, California, United States

Site Status

Forest Research Institute 033

Westlake Village, California, United States

Site Status

Forest Research Institute 010

DeLand, Florida, United States

Site Status

Forest Research Institute 019

Holly Hill, Florida, United States

Site Status

Forest Research Institute 036

Hollywood, Florida, United States

Site Status

Forest Research Institute 007

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Forest Research Institute 009

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Forest Research Institute 006

Oxon Hill, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Forest Research Institute 027

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Forest Research Institute 050

Salisbury, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Forest Research Institute 039

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Forest Investigative Site 002

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Forest Research Institute 032

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Forest Research Institute 008

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Forest Research Institute 003

Carrollton, Texas, United States

Site Status

Forest Research Institute 012

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Forest Research Institute 048

Sugar Land, Texas, United States

Site Status

Forest Research Institute 040

Bountiful, Utah, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://mylan.com

Related Info

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NEB-MD-03

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.