Lenalidomide in Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Without Chromosome 5q Abnormalities
NCT ID: NCT00546897
Last Updated: 2014-09-29
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
48 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-02-28
2012-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Lenalidomide in Treating Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT00352365
Lenalidomide as Consolidation and Maintenance in Adults >/= 60 Years of Age With AML Following Standard Induction
NCT01578954
Lenalidomide as Initial Treatment of Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Age 65 and Older
NCT00535873
Lenalidomide for Myelodysplastic Syndrome Refractory to Hypomethylating Agents
NCT01246076
Lenalidomide Versus Placebo in Myelodysplastic Syndromes With a Deletion 5q[31] Abnormality
NCT00179621
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In trials of lenalidomide in patients with MDS the dose of lenalidomide has been reduced for myelotoxicity and/or thrombocytopenia. However, current paradigms for the therapy of acute myeloid leukemia are based on using high doses of myelosuppressive chemotherapy and supporting the patient through a 4-5 weeks period of neutropenia/thrombocytopenia in an attempt to eliminate the malignant clone. Based on its efficacy in the related myeloid disorder MDS, and the close relationship between MDS and AML in patients \> 60, this trial employs the same paradigm of myelosuppressive therapy using high dose lenalidomide instead of chemotherapy. Importantly, within the MDS trials using low doses of lenalidomide, responses were observed in 3/9 (33%) of patients with excess blasts (RAEB/RAEB-t), which are now classified as evolving into AML or AML. This suggests that the therapeutic effect of lenalidomide occurs in the setting of a large percentage of blasts, such as AML, although the dose and schedule of lenalidomide administration is different. The response of AML \>= 60 patients to the proposed high dose lenalidomide regimen is unknown. Following high dose lenalidomide, in those patients that have a response, we propose using a lower dose maintenance strategy similar to the FDA approved dosing for MDS. The maintenance phase will include standard dose reductions for unacceptable toxicities.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cohort 1
Lenalidomide 50 mg/day oral for 14 days followed by 30 days of rest. Lenalidomide 50 mg/day oral for 21 days (this is Cycle 1 and Cycle 2).
If no progressive disease (PD) then lenalidomide 10 mg/day oral for 28 days for 12 cycles.
Lenalidomide
Cohort 2
Cycle 1: Oral lenalidomide 50 mg/day x 28 days induction therapy. Treatment will then depend on the response to Cycle 1: if patients obtain a complete remission (CR) they will proceed to low dose lenalidomide therapy, if patients have a non-CR they will receive a second high dose cycle of lenalidomide 50 mg/day x 28 days (Cycle 2) Cycle 2 consists of lenalidomide 50mg/day x 28 days Further treatment will depend on the response to Cycle 2: if patients obtain a CR/partial remission (PR)/stable disease (SD) they will proceed to low dose lenalidomide therapy, if patients have PD they will be removed from the study.
Low Dose Cycles: low dose lenalidomide therapy consisting of 10 mg daily for a 28 day cycle.be 1) For patients that achieve a CR, 2 cycles of low dose lenalidomide will be administered, and then patients observed off therapy. For patients with PR/SD, low dose lenalidomide will continue for a total of 6 cycles and then patients will be observed off therapy.
Lenalidomide
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lenalidomide
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Intermediate or poor-risk cytogenetics as defined by SWOG criteria
* Age ≥ 60 years at the time of signing the informed consent form.
* Understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form.
* Able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements.
* No previous treatment for AML, however hydroxyurea, steroids, and leukopheresis are allowed
* ECOG performance status of ≤ 2 at study entry.
* Life expectancy \> 2 months
* Adequate organ function as defined by:
* Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5X institution upper limit of normal (ULN)
* Total bilirubin ≤ 2.0 mg/dL
* AST (SGOT) and ALT (SGPT) ≤ 5 x ULN
* Females of childbearing potential (FCBP) must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test with a sensitivity of at least 50 mIU/mL within 10 - 14 days prior to and again within 24 hours of starting lenalidomide and must either commit to continued abstinence from heterosexual intercourse or begin TWO acceptable methods of birth control, one highly effective method and one additional effective method AT THE SAME TIME, at least 28 days before she starts taking lenalidomide. FCBP must also agree to ongoing pregnancy testing. Men must agree to use a latex condom during sexual contact with a FCBP even if they have had a successful vasectomy. All patients must be counseled at a minimum of every 28 days about pregnancy precautions and risks of fetal exposure.
* Disease free of prior malignancies for ≥ 5 years with exception of currently treated basal cell, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or carcinoma "in situ" of the cervix or breast.
Exclusion Criteria
* Favorable risk cytogenetic abnormalities as defined by SWOG criteria (http://www.bloodjournal.org/cgi/content/abstract/96/13/4075) that include: inv(16)/t(16;16)/del(16q), t(15;17) with/without secondary aberrations, t(8;21) lacking del(9q) or complex karyotype (16). Prior to enrollment, FISH, molecular studies or routine cytogenetics must be completed to rule out these cytogenetic abnormalities.
* Known CNS leukemia
* Any serious medical condition, laboratory abnormality, or psychiatric illness that would prevent the subject from signing the informed consent form.
* Any condition, including the presence of laboratory abnormalities, which places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study or confounds the ability to interpret data from the study.
* Use of any other experimental drug or therapy within 30 days of enrollment.
* Known hypersensitivity to thalidomide.
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Washington University School of Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ravi Vij, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Washington University School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
List A, Kurtin S, Roe DJ, Buresh A, Mahadevan D, Fuchs D, Rimsza L, Heaton R, Knight R, Zeldis JB. Efficacy of lenalidomide in myelodysplastic syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2005 Feb 10;352(6):549-57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041668.
List, AF, G Dewald, J Bennett, et al. 2005. Hematologic and Cytogenetic (CTG) Response to Lenalidomide (CC-5013) in Patients with Transfusion-Dependent (TD) Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and Chromosome 5q31.1 Deletion: Results of the Multicenter MDS-003 Study. In ASCO, Orlando, FL.
Bansal D, Vij K, Chang GS, Miller CA, DiPersio JF, Vij R, Heath SE, Westervelt P, Welch JS, Fehniger TA. Lenalidomide results in a durable complete remission in acute myeloid leukemia accompanied by persistence of somatic mutations and a T-cell infiltrate in the bone marrow. Haematologica. 2018 Jun;103(6):e270-e273. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2017.184168. Epub 2018 Mar 22. No abstract available.
Fehniger TA, Uy GL, Trinkaus K, Nelson AD, Demland J, Abboud CN, Cashen AF, Stockerl-Goldstein KE, Westervelt P, DiPersio JF, Vij R. A phase 2 study of high-dose lenalidomide as initial therapy for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2011 Feb 10;117(6):1828-33. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-07-297143. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
Fehniger TA, Byrd JC, Marcucci G, Abboud CN, Kefauver C, Payton JE, Vij R, Blum W. Single-agent lenalidomide induces complete remission of acute myeloid leukemia in patients with isolated trisomy 13. Blood. 2009 Jan 29;113(5):1002-5. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-04-152678. Epub 2008 Sep 29.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
06-0907
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.