Testing a Personally Controlled Health Record to Ameliorate Influenza at MIT
NCT ID: NCT00531700
Last Updated: 2009-05-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
800 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-10-31
2009-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Nudging Flu Vaccination in Patients at Moderately High Risk for Flu and Flu-related Complications
NCT05509283
Promoting Flu Vaccination Through a Mobile Wellness Program
NCT02908893
Behavioral Economics to Improve Flu Vaccination Using EHR Nudges
NCT06057727
Brief Informational Intervention for COVID-19 Misinformation Prophylaxis
NCT04557241
You and Me Healthy
NCT05589376
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim 1.To leverage an electronic personally controlled health record as a public health tool, establishing three way communication systems among individuals, health systems, and public health agencies. We will establish a formal mechanism for patients to integrate and share healthcare-based and personally entered information. Individuals can share information from their medical record, and in response to surveys delivered through the system. There will be two way communications between the record and the State Immunization Registry. Particular attention will be paid to information security, compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) privacy rule, and personal control. Primary measurements include the structural integrity of the information system, use and usability of the system, and user acceptance. The main hypothesis to be tested is that people are generally willing to share their personally controlled data to promote personal and public health.
Aim 2. To adapt a traditional syndromic surveillance system, initially designed as an early detector of outbreaks, to nimbly identify patients to be targeted for behavior change through personally controlled electronic records. We will develop health messages as cues to action, directed at improving individual compliance with influenza prevention, calibrating our detection models to identify high risk groups, based on demographic and clinical data contained in personal health records. Messages will be targeted at appropriate risk groups and contain information tailored to the individual's characteristics. The primary focus will be to encourage influenza immunization when indicated and conversely, to encourage delay in immunization under conditions of low risk and scarcity. We will change the content, tempo, and targets of the messages based on real time influenza surveillance. The main hypothesis to be tested is that a real-time surveillance system can be used to calibrate health messaging. A second hypothesis is that sentinel individuals can provide data to surveillance systems that adds value to what is already collected.
Aim 3. To measure the impact on immunization rates of tailored health messages, linked to surveillance, and delivered through a personal health record. We will evaluate the impact of directed communications delivered to randomly selected study participants through a personal health record on influenza vaccination rates comparing them to rates among control participants. Secondary outcomes will include message impacts on rates of self-reported illness, knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about influenza and immunization efficacy, use of recommended health protective behaviors. We will investigate the impacts on technology use and immunization rates of a range of individual social demographic characteristics, household characteristics, and computing-related factors that may influence the acceptability of the proposed technology and/or target health behaviors. The main hypothesis to be tested is that individuals exposed to tailored health messages delivered through a PCHR will have higher influenza immunization rates than their unexposed peers. Secondary hypotheses are that compliance will be moderated by computing experience, acceptability/accessibility, individual demographics (e.g., age, sex, race/ethnicity, social class) social and scheduling supports (e.g., work/time schedule flexibility) , family health factors, and logistical factors (transportation, ease of access to immunization sites, convenience, clear scheduling/notification and minimal waiting time for services).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
I
Exposure to both tailored/targeted health messages about influenza and also to reports about contextualized influenza risk
Health messaging
Combinations of personalized health messages (tailored/targeted) and contextualized health messages (reports about localized epidemiologic risk) will be delivered to subjects
II
Exposure to tailored/targeted health messages
Health messaging
Combinations of personalized health messages (tailored/targeted) and contextualized health messages (reports about localized epidemiologic risk) will be delivered to subjects
III
Exposure to reports about influenza related contextualized risk
Health messaging
Combinations of personalized health messages (tailored/targeted) and contextualized health messages (reports about localized epidemiologic risk) will be delivered to subjects
IV
Comparison group exposed to community level health promotion messages not generated by the study
Health messages
community level health messages unrelated to the study originating exposures
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Health messaging
Combinations of personalized health messages (tailored/targeted) and contextualized health messages (reports about localized epidemiologic risk) will be delivered to subjects
Health messages
community level health messages unrelated to the study originating exposures
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* English speaker
* Affiliated with study site
Exclusion Criteria
* No access to computers or the internet
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
FED
Boston Children's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Children's Hospital Boston
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Elissa R Weitzman
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Boston Children's Hospital
Kenneth D Mandl
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Boston Children's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Children's Hospital Boston
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
06-07-0347
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.