Endoscopic Posterior Mesorectal Resection in T1 Rectal Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00531297

Last Updated: 2018-09-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

18 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-12-01

Study Completion Date

2018-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Any efforts to spare patients with T1 carcinomas of the rectum from low anterior resection or even abdominoperineal resection are linked to the risk of locoregional recurrence of about 10% (range, 0-24). This is tolerated in the view of the morbidity and mortality risk related to transabdominal resection, which is as high as 7-68% and 0-6.5%, respectively. Accordingly, in addition to transanal local excision various adjuvant therapy schemes with chemo- and/or radiotherapy were developed, given the uncertainty about the lymph node stage. Another approach was to identify histological risk criteria in the primary tumor in terms of defining the limits of rectum-sparing therapy.

In earlier experimental and clinical studies the investigators researched and applied dorsoposterior extraperitoneal pelviscopy, i.e. perineal access to the soft-tissue areas of the minor pelvis using minimally invasive surgery. in T1 carcinoma of the rectum this technique becomes all the more significant, as the perineal approach makes it possible to perform an endoscopic posterior mesorectal resection (EPMR) in combination with rectum-sparing surgery Thereby the relevant lymphatic field of the lower rectum can be removed and histologically examined. As a consequence EPMR should lower the loco-regional recurrence rate, since the most common causes of such are pre-existent but so far not detectable lymph node metastases besides the incomplete resection of the primary tumor.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rectal Neoplasms

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Treatment arm

endoscopic posterior mesorectal resection

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

endoscopic posterior mesorectal resection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

6 weeks after local excision of a T1 rectal cancer a rectum sparing endoscopic removal of the dorsal part of the mesorectum by EPMR is performed.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

endoscopic posterior mesorectal resection

6 weeks after local excision of a T1 rectal cancer a rectum sparing endoscopic removal of the dorsal part of the mesorectum by EPMR is performed.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Stage T1 (only)
* Over 18 years old
* Patient's consent
* Previous R0 resection of rectal tumor

Exclusion Criteria

* Metastases (M1)
* Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy
* Meta- or synchronous tumors
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Heidelberg University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Basel

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Krakau, Department of Visceral surgery

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ignazio Tarantino

M.D.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andreas Zerz, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Surgery

Sankt Gallen, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EKSG 05/072/2B

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Local Recurrence Due to Rectal Cancer in Sweden
NCT04404777 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING