Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
22 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-08-31
2008-02-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety Study of Spray-Dried Solvent/Detergent-Treated Plasma for Infusion in Healthy Volunteers
NCT01589666
Comparing Soybean Oil-Based (Intralipid) With an Olive Oil-Based (ClinOleic) Lipid Emulsion on Healthy Volunteers
NCT02185729
Staccato Zaleplon Single Dose Pharmacokinetics
NCT00620620
Study Comparing a Soybean Oil-Based With an Olive Oil-Based Lipid Emulsion in ICU Patients Requiring TPN
NCT00672854
Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine for Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade at the End of Kidney Transplantation Surgery
NCT03923556
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The source of increased endotoxin in dialysis patients remains unclear, with the most popular hypotheses including back-diffusion of bacterial products from nonsterile dialysate and translocation of bacterial products across what in most dialysis patients is an edematous gut wall. This endotoxin does not appear to be associated with the dialysis procedure itself and indeed, appears to be cleared with some efficiency by the procedure. However, by the next dialysis treatment, endotoxin levels rise rapidly to levels that are in some cases significantly higher than even those measured (via EAA) in patients suffering from septic shock. Although the mechanisms by which dialysis patients tolerate these high endotoxin levels without hemodynamic collapse are not understood, high levels have been shown by The Rogosin Institute to significantly correlate with patient fatigue.
Given the potent ability of endotoxin to induce expression of inflammatory cytokines (which in turn are likely responsible for the debilitating symptoms of fatigue and malaise that afflict the majority of the dialysis population), it is logical that binding and inactivation of endotoxin may lead to improved clinical outcomes. Unfortunately, there are no products currently approved for this purpose in dialysis patients.
One approach to this problem may be to augment the endogenous systems for endotoxin inactivation. For example, it has been suggested that the various serum lipoprotein fractions may in fact be a physiologic "sink" for endotoxin (and other toxins) via binding with surface phospholipids. Therefore, dialysis patients, who as a population are characterized with hypocholesterolemia and hypolipoproteinemia, are particularly at risk for the deleterious effects of endotoxemia.
This has led to the development of "LIPIDOSE," a protein-free phospholipid emulsion. The proposed mechanism of action of this compound is via remodeling of the infused phospholipids into lipoproteins, thereby increasing lipoprotein and phospholipid content and facilitating greater endotoxin binding and neutralization. "LIPIDOSE" has undergone extensive testing in both animals and humans, and has been found to significantly increase serum phospholipid and lipoprotein concentrations, improve survival in a lethal animal model of septic peritonitis, and mitigate the symptoms of endotoxemia in healthy volunteers.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lipidose
Dosage of 1.5 mL/kg of Lipidose over a 2-hour period.
Lipidose
Over the course of 2 weeks, immediately following subject's three (Monday/Wednesday/Friday (M/W/F)) normal dialysis treatments, based on subject's current weight, subject will receive 1.5 mL/kg of Lipidose over a 2-hour period.
Placebo
Dosage of 1.5 mL/kg of Placebo over a 2-hour period.
Placebo
Over the course of 2 weeks, immediately following subject's three (M/W/F) normal dialysis treatments, based on subject's current weight, subject will receive 1.5 mL/kg of placebo over a 2-hour period.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lipidose
Over the course of 2 weeks, immediately following subject's three (Monday/Wednesday/Friday (M/W/F)) normal dialysis treatments, based on subject's current weight, subject will receive 1.5 mL/kg of Lipidose over a 2-hour period.
Placebo
Over the course of 2 weeks, immediately following subject's three (M/W/F) normal dialysis treatments, based on subject's current weight, subject will receive 1.5 mL/kg of placebo over a 2-hour period.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Provided written and dated informed consent.
3. Meets the following lab parameters on Screening labs:
* Serum albumin \> 2.5 g/dL;
* Serum total cholesterol \> 95 mg/dL;
* Serum High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) \> 20 mg/dL;
* Serum hemoglobin ≥ 11 g/dL;
* Serum transaminases \< 2x the upper limit of normal.
4. Has had a dialysis adequacy level (KT/V) greater than 1.3 for 2 months prior to screening.
5. Has a vitality score of ≤ 16 at time of screening.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Pregnant, breast-feeding or female of childbearing potential who does not agree to remain abstinent or to use an acceptable contraceptive regimen (oral contraceptive, double-barrier method, or abstention from sexual relations) during the study period.
3. Has any of the following laboratory abnormalities when screened:
* Serum haptoglobin below the lower limit of normal;
* Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) \> 300 U/L;
* Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) \> 190 mg/dL;
* Fasting (8 hours, water only) triglyceride level \> 300 mg/dL;
* Serum phospholipid level \> 500 mg/dL.
4. Has an EAA level \< 0.6 Endotoxin Activity (EA) at screening.
5. Has prolonged heart wave (QT) interval (as defined by corrected QT (QTc) \> 460 msec in males and \> 470 msec in females) on screening electrocardiogram (ECG).
6. Has a history of allergic reaction to eggs (or egg products), soybeans, Intralipid, or any component of "LIPIDOSE".
7. Has had a recent hospitalization (within the last 30 days) or has other acute illness.
8. Deemed not medically or psychiatrically stable for the study (in opinion of investigator or the subject's primary nephrologist).
9. Currently on any of the following medications: (a) medications known to cause QT prolongation; (b) parenteral nutrition supplements (e.g., Intralipid); (c)amphotericin; (d) liposomal amphotericin; (e) amphotericin B lipid complex; or (f) coumadin.
10. Has known preexisting systolic dysfunction (as defined by previous echocardiogram with ejection fraction (EF) \< 35%).
11. Currently receiving one of the following prohibited concomitant medications; parenteral nutrition supplements containing lipid "emulsion" (e.g., Intralipid), amphotericin, liposomal amphotericin, or amphotericin B lipid complex.
12. Has a known active hemolytic disease; immune hemolytic anemias, hemoglobinopathies (sickle cell anemia and thalassemia major) or is known or believed to suffer from hereditary spherocytosis or S.E. Asian elliptocytosis.
13. Has a known bone marrow disorder of inadequate red cell production (e.g., aplastic anemia, myelodysplasia).
14. Has known current alcohol or drug abuse.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Rogosin Institute
OTHER
Sepsicure
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Roxana Bologa, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Rogosin Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rogosin Manhattan Dialysis Center
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
S201
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.