Impact of Teledermatology on Health Services Outcomes in the Department of Veterans Affairs

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

392 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-11-30

Study Completion Date

2011-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study compares store and forward teledermatology with the conventional clinic-based consult process. Our primary objective is to determine whether the mean change in quality of life, as rated by the subscale scores and composite score on the Skindex-16 differs between the store and forward and conventional care modalities.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Health Services Implications of a Teledermatology Consult System

NCT00013234

Teledermatology

COMPLETED NA

Teledermatology Mobile App: Patient Facing

NCT03241589

Introduction of Teledermatology Mobile Apps

COMPLETED

Direct-to-patient Teledermatology and Computer-assisted Diagnosis

NCT05128006

New Patient Use of Teledermatology Mobile App

RECRUITING

Using Multimedia Patient Feedback to Reduce Disparities in VA Healthcare

NCT00914485

Primary Care

COMPLETED NA

Encouraging Patient-Centered Communication in Clinical Video Telehealth Visits

NCT02522494

Diabetes Mellitus

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Anticipated Impact on Veterans' Healthcare - Teledermatology has the potential to have a significant impact on veterans' healthcare. There is an unmet demand for Dermatology services distributed throughout a nation-wide patient base. Decentralization of care through the expansion of Community Based Outpatient Centers (CBOCs) adds to the demand for these services. Dermatologic care typically resides only at the largest medical centers within a Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISN). Teledermatology is one means of meeting the demand for Dermatology services by delivering dermatologic care to those sites that are geographically removed from the Dermatology Consult Service.

Project Background - For the majority of ambulatory skin conditions encountered in Primary Care and Dermatology Clinics the impact those conditions have on patients' quality of life is of principal importance. Commonly encountered skin diseases frequently result in discomfort or pain, pruritis, emotional concerns, embarrassment, anxiety, and interfere with activities of daily living, work activities, or interpersonal relations. To date, no data exist that compares quality of life outcomes - the fundamental metric to assess in an ambulatory dermatology population - between patients undergoing store and forward teledermatology consultations with patients managed by the conventional consult processes. Existing data does indicate that teledermatology is a reliable and accurate method of diagnosing skin disease.

Research Objectives - The purpose of this study was to compare store and forward teledermatology with a conventional clinic-based dermatology consultation process. Our primary objective was to determine whether the mean change in patient quality of life, as rated by the composite score and subscale scores of a skin-specific quality of life index (Skindex-16), differed between the time of randomization and 9 months for patients evaluated by store and forward teledermatology compared to conventional consult methods. Secondary objectives included (a) assessing quality of life between time of randomization and 3 months, (b) assessing time to initial definitive evaluation for patients using each modality, (c) evaluating clinical course using serial digital imaging, (d) comparing the costs and cost-effectiveness of store and forward teledermatology with conventional consult methods.

Project Methods - The study was a parallel-group, superiority, randomized clinical trial that compared store and forward teledermatology with a conventional clinic-based consult process. Patients were randomized using a simple randomization scheme stratified by site to one of the two consult modalities. Eligible patients included those being referred from the remote sites of primary care to the medical center-based sites of dermatology services. Skindex-16 was administered at baseline, 3 months, and 9 months. Time to initial definitive evaluation, calculated based on the need for and timing of a clinic-based visit was measured for both groups. Using digital images, clinical course was assessed on a 5 point scale by an expert panel of three dermatologists. Categories included resolved, improved, unchanged not clinically relevant, unchanged clinically relevant, and worse. Health care utilities were measured using time trade-off data and the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 (HUI2). We compared the costs of teledermatology with conventional consult methods by estimating the average cost per patient over the 9 month study period. Effectiveness was assessed using health care utilities and time to initial definitive evaluation. Costs were estimated from the VA perspective.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Skin Diseases Telemedicine Quality of Life

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1

Store and forward teledermatology consult process

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Store and forward teledermatology

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard electronic consult, standardized history, and image set

Arm 2

Conventional consult process

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Store and forward teledermatology

Standard electronic consult, standardized history, and image set

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Teledermatology

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with a single non-emergent skin condition being referred to a VA Dermatology Clinic
* Must be a veteran at the study site

Exclusion Criteria

* Full body examination requested
* Unable to read or speak English
* Emergent skin condition
* Pending dermatology appointment within 9 months
* Previous enrollment in the study
* Impending move from the area

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No