Visibility of Lesion Characteristics With Phase Contrast Mammography
NCT ID: NCT00467727
Last Updated: 2012-05-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
53 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-04-30
2008-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of Monochromatic X-ray Mammography System
NCT07219797
Comparison of Contrast Enhanced Mammography to Breast MRI in Screening Patients at Increased Risk for Breast Cancer
NCT01716247
Test of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs. Regular Mammography in Detecting Breast Cancer in Women Undergoing Diagnostic Mammography
NCT00535327
Using Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy With MRI to Non-invasively Determine Breast Cancer Extent of Disease
NCT00312637
Digital Mammography: Computer-Aided Breast Cancer Diagnosis
NCT00732433
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
If the ability to clearly see margins and edges of lesions is possible at screening mammography, this would potentially decrease the overall radiation exposure currently needed to allow radiologists to be confident of their characterizations for the majority of patients using x-ray mammography. Digital mammography was developed to improve the visibility of lesions primarily in dense breasts. The reasoning was that the improved contrast range would allow for wider range of gray level differentiation but with digital mammography comes a spatial resolution limitation that blurred edges of lesions. Phase contrast mammography (PCM) was developed to improve digital mammography by providing improvement in sharpness of edges utilizing the x-ray properties of refraction.
Comparison: Phase Contrast Mammography to X-Ray Mammography for Lesion Visibility of Diagnostic Population
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Phase Contrast Mammography Exam
Phase Contrast Mammography
Standard and magnification views
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Phase Contrast Mammography
Standard and magnification views
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Female
* Scheduled for diagnostic work-up including compression/magnification views of screening detected breast lesion
Exclusion Criteria
* Male
* No screening detected findings
* Breast implants
* Any women who is pregnant or has reason to believe she is pregnant or lactating
* Women with breasts larger than the 24 x 30 cm receptor
40 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Etta D Pisano, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Carolina Center for Clinical Trials, University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tabar L, Yen MF, Vitak B, Chen HH, Smith RA, Duffy SW. Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening. Lancet. 2003 Apr 26;361(9367):1405-10. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13143-1.
Tanaka T, Honda C, Matsuo S, Noma K, Oohara H, Nitta N, Ota S, Tsuchiya K, Sakashita Y, Yamada A, Yamasaki M, Furukawa A, Takahashi M, Murata K. The first trial of phase contrast imaging for digital full-field mammography using a practical molybdenum x-ray tube. Invest Radiol. 2005 Jul;40(7):385-96. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000165575.43381.48.
Pisano ED, Cole EB, Major S, Zong S, Hemminger BM, Muller KE, Johnston RE, Walsh R, Conant E, Fajardo LL, Feig SA, Nishikawa RM, Yaffe MJ, Williams MB, Aylward SR. Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display. The International Digital Mammography Development Group. Radiology. 2000 Sep;216(3):820-30. doi: 10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00se48820.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LCCC0702
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.