Marketing Workplace Chronic Disease Prevention

NCT ID: NCT00452816

Last Updated: 2009-11-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

48 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-04-30

Study Completion Date

2009-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of the project is to understand how best to help mid-size employers adopt evidence-based chronic disease prevention practices that improve employee health behaviors.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Employers have the incentive and the means to play a key role in chronic disease prevention. The incentive - employers need to control the costly and growing burden of chronic diseases among their employees. The means - employers purchase 94% of private health insurance, and employees spend one third of their lives in the workplace, where they often eat, move, socialize, and smoke. Over the past 5 years, the CDC and the Task Force on Community Preventive Services have recommended a number of chronic disease prevention practices. Among these, we have identified 17 practices that employers should adopt. These practices include health insurance benefits, workplace policies, and workplace programs, and aim at increasing employees' disease screening, healthy eating, influenza immunization, physical activity and tobacco cessation. Unfortunately, employer surveys reveal low adoption of these practices.

Working with the American Cancer Society, our research team from the University of Washington has developed and pilot-tested an innovative consulting intervention to increase adoption of these practices. Our two-stage intervention is comprehensive yet tailored by employer feedback.

The intervention:

* markets the "business case" that employers can help control health-care costs and productivity losses through adoption of these practices
* enables implementation by providing tools for each practice.

In this proposal, our primary aim is to test this intervention in a randomized, controlled trial among 48 medium-sized employers with a high proportion of socioeconomically disadvantaged employees in the Puget Sound area. Our primary outcome is change in employer practices as measured by survey and validated by audit and contract and policy review.

Our secondary aims include:

* development and pilot-testing of an employee-level health risk behavior survey
* cost analysis and assessment of feasibility of our intervention
* assessment of employees' preference for different message sources and message appeals.

Our multidisciplinary research team includes business, communication, and public health faculty and has more than 10 years of experience in both chronic disease prevention and working with business. If successful, our team's approach has broad applicability to other public health problems.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Health Behavior Chronic Disease

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Chronic Disease Employer Health Costs Health Promotion Insurance Benefits Marketing of Health Services Mass Screening Prevention & Control Tobacco Use Cessation Workplace

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention

Intervention Group - Workplace Solutions Consulting

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Workplace Solutions Consulting approach

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Consulting process includes:

1. baseline measure of best practices
2. gap analysis and recommendations reporting
3. delivery of "solution set" toolkits for each practice chosen for implementation

2

Delayed Intervention

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Delayed intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Abbreviated version of the Workplace Solutions Consulting process applied in the intervention group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Workplace Solutions Consulting approach

Consulting process includes:

1. baseline measure of best practices
2. gap analysis and recommendations reporting
3. delivery of "solution set" toolkits for each practice chosen for implementation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Delayed intervention

Abbreviated version of the Workplace Solutions Consulting process applied in the intervention group

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Corporate size equal to 100 to 999 part-time and full-time employees (excluding seasonal and temporary workers)
* Headquarters located in King County, Washington, and in a zip code within a 30 mile radius of the research center
* Within an industry with an average annual salary below the median annual salary for King County, Washington (defined by 3-digit NAICS code)
* 50% or more employees are age 35 or older

Exclusion Criteria

* Do not offer health insurance to full-time employees
* In existence for less than 3 years
* No physical address to which employees report
* Current or previous participation in other workplace health promotion study
* Recent refuser or non-responder for other current workplace health promotion study
* Current participant in other American Cancer Society employer program
* Not willing to be randomized to intervention or comparison group
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

American Cancer Society, Inc.

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Washington

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

University of Washington

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jeffrey R Harris, MD, MPH, MBA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Washington

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Washington

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hannon PA, Harris JR, Sopher CJ, Kuniyuki A, Ghosh DL, Henderson S, Martin DP, Weaver MR, Williams B, Albano DL, Meischke H, Diehr P, Lichiello P, Hammerback KE, Parks MR, Forehand M. Improving low-wage, midsized employers' health promotion practices: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Aug;43(2):125-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.014.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22813676 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CDC Grant 1 PO1 CD000249-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

06-4829-E/G 01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id