In-exsufflator Cough Assist Device in Patients With Symptomatic Bronchiectasis
NCT ID: NCT00452114
Last Updated: 2018-09-18
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
28 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-04-30
2008-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Increased Lung Volume as Controller Therapy for Asthma
NCT02953431
Lung Function Outcomes Following Removal of Airway Mucus Plugs in Patients With Asthma (FOCUS)
NCT05748912
Airway Temperature
NCT02401074
Mucociliary Clearance in Healthy Subjects: Comparison of Levalbuterol and Racemic Albuterol
NCT00325767
The Impact of Breath Exercises by Telemedicine in Patients Aged 8-18 Years With a Diagnosis of Asthma
NCT05749237
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The mechanical in-exsufflator device assists patients in clearing retained secretions by augmenting the expiratory flow and force of the patient's cough with the addition of a cycle of positive and negative inspiratory pressure. An effective cough mechanism is actually an important and beneficial host defense which aids in mucus clearance along with the mucociliary apparatus. We hypothesize that daily, regular use of the in-exsufflator device will lead to a reduction in acute bronchiectasis exacerbations- a clinically meaningful endpoint- with other possible beneficial outcomes including improved pulmonary function, improved health-related quality of life and decreased health care costs.
Despite the lack of rigorous, well-designed studies supporting the role and most effective mode of bronchial hygiene physiotherapy in patients with bronchiectasis, many Pulmonologists recommend the flutter valve device as the generally accepted "standard of care" at this time due to its relative non-invasiveness, ease of use and high level of patient acceptability. The flutter valve is a simple, hand-held, pipe-like device which helps loosen secretions by providing an expiratory low-pressure vibratory pulse to the patient's airway when used. This study will provide a comparison of the clinical efficacy of these mechanical chest physiotherapy devices in the setting of bronchiectasis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Assignment to In-Exsufflator Cough Assist Device
In-Exsufflator Cough Assist Device augments the expiratory flow and force of the patient's cough with the addition of a cycle of positive and negative inspiratory pressure when used daily
In-Exsufflator Cough Assist Device
Assignment to flutter valve device
flutter valve device delivers expiratory low-pressure vibratory pulse to the patient's airway when used daily
Active Comparator: Flutter Valve Device
Active Comparator
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
In-Exsufflator Cough Assist Device
Active Comparator: Flutter Valve Device
Active Comparator
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* At least two exacerbations in the preceding 12 months requiring antibiotics
Exclusion Criteria
* Bullous emphysema
* History of spontaneous pneumothorax
* History of massive hemoptysis: greater than 200 cc in a 24 hour period
* Lung resection surgery in the past 6 months
* Use of the mechanical cough in-exsufflator in the prior 3 months
* Inability to speak and read English
* Inability to demonstrate proper use of the cough-assist or flutter device
* Unable to provide informed consent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Stephen Krinzman
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stephen J Krinzman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UMass Memorial Medical Center, Universty Campus
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
St. Vincent Medical Center
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H-11138
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.