Mannitol Versus Hypertonic Saline Solution in the Treatment of Elevated Intracranial Pressure

NCT ID: NCT00447018

Last Updated: 2007-03-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-10-31

Study Completion Date

2005-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether mannitol is as effective as hypertonic saline solution in the treatment of elevated intracranial pressure in patients with brain injury.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Elevation of intracranial pressure (ICP) to more than 20 mmHg plays a major role in the worsening of the neurological status through the impairment of brain perfusion. In an effort to reduce the intensity and the time spent with increased ICP, infusion of mannitol has been the recommended first-line agent for years. The growing interest in the use of hypertonic saline solutions (HSS) in this clinical setting has, however, challenged the use of mannitol. Because mannitol and HSS may differ regarding their clinically relevant mechanisms of action, there is a need to determine which osmotic compound could be the most appropriate in patients with elevated ICP. We conduct thus a parallel, randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of an equimolar infusion of 20% mannitol or 7.45% HSS without colloid in patients with elevated ICP. The primary end point of this trial is the magnitude of ICP and of cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) changes following treatment during a study period of 120 min.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intracranial Hypertension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

20% mannitol

Intervention Type DRUG

7.45% hypertonic saline solution

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age 18 or older
* sustained elevated intracranial pressure to more than 20 mmHg for more than 10 min
* mechanically ventilated in stable conditions for more than 2 hours prior to the study
* serum osmolality ranged between 280 and 320 mOsm/kg

Exclusion Criteria

* imminent cranial or extracranial surgery
* leakage or drainage of cerebral spinal fluid
* unstable respiratory and hemodynamic conditions
* oliguric renal failure
* anemia
* use of mannitol or HSS in the previous 6 hours
* concomitant use of thiopentone
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Grenoble

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jean-Francois Payen, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Grenoble

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hopital Michallon

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Battison C, Andrews PJ, Graham C, Petty T. Randomized, controlled trial on the effect of a 20% mannitol solution and a 7.5% saline/6% dextran solution on increased intracranial pressure after brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2005 Jan;33(1):196-202; discussion 257-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000150269.65485.a6.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15644669 (View on PubMed)

Vialet R, Albanese J, Thomachot L, Antonini F, Bourgouin A, Alliez B, Martin C. Isovolume hypertonic solutes (sodium chloride or mannitol) in the treatment of refractory posttraumatic intracranial hypertension: 2 mL/kg 7.5% saline is more effective than 2 mL/kg 20% mannitol. Crit Care Med. 2003 Jun;31(6):1683-7. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000063268.91710.DF.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12794404 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0224

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Sodium-Lactate and Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT00319345 TERMINATED PHASE2/PHASE3
Mannitol Brain Relaxation Effect
NCT02168075 UNKNOWN NA
Preventive Sodium Lactate and Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT00995683 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3
Hypertonic Saline for Mild TBI in Pediatric Patients
NCT07060105 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Sodium Lactate and Brain Relaxation (LSD)
NCT04488874 COMPLETED PHASE3