Presentation of Lumbar Disc and Reduction of Symptoms

NCT ID: NCT00440856

Last Updated: 2015-06-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-02-28

Study Completion Date

2008-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The trial aims to assess the hypothesis that presentation of the disc material to the patient following a lumbar microdiscectomy would positively influence the improvement in their leg and back symptoms.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objective. The trial aims to assess the hypothesis that presentation of removed material to the patient following a lumbar microdiscectomy would positively influence the improvement in their radiculopathic and degenerative symptoms.

Design. Data will be collected prospectively. Patient allocation to treatment groups will be by simple randomization using a computer generated sequence of random numbers. Trial participants will be blinded as to the trial hypothesis and investigators blinded to patient allocation.

Setting. Patients will all be treated in a single secondary care unit.

Participants. All adult patients undergoing a planned lumbar microdiscectomy for radiculopathy due to a prolapsed intervertebral disc over a six month period will be considered for entry into the trial. Exclusion criteria: inability to give verbal consent, age less than 18, previous spinal surgery, emergency discectomies, patients having spinal fusions and those with no radiculopathic symptoms.

Intervention. Patients allocated to the experimental arm will be given the removed disc fragments to keep once they have recovered from anaesthesia. Those in the control arm will not be shown disc fragments (best available treatment).

Main outcome measure. The degree of improvement in radiculopathic and degenerative symptoms reported by the patient at 2-3 months after surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Radiculopathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

experimental

Participants are given their disc fragments following their operation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Presentation of excised intervertebral disc fragments

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Presentation of excised intervertebral disc fragments

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All adult patients undergoing a planned lumbar microdiscectomy for radiculopathy due to a prolapsed intervertebral disc

Exclusion Criteria

* inability to give verbal consent, age less than 18, previous spinal surgery, emergency discectomies, patients having spinal fusions and those with no radiculopathic symptoms.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

St George's, University of London

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marios C Papadopoulos, DLitt

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

St George's, University of London

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St George's Hospital, University of London

London, London, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DT2656

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.