Trial Outcomes & Findings for Rosiglitazone (Extended Release Tablets) As Monotherapy In Subjects With Mild To Moderate Alzheimer's Disease (NCT NCT00428090)

NCT ID: NCT00428090

Last Updated: 2017-05-19

Results Overview

The 11-item ADAS-Cog assessed a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Items were evaluated by tests and clinician ratings on a 5-point scale. Scores ranged from 0-70 with higher scores indicates more dysfunction. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline is defined as value at W0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for the two rosiglitazone dose groups and the three genetic subgroups. There was no adjustment for the donepezil versus placebo comparisons, which were included to assess the sensitivity of the trial to detect a treatment effect.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

862 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline (W0) and W24

Results posted on

2017-05-19

Participant Flow

Participants (par.) were enrolled across 134 centres Austria, Bulgaria, Chile, China, Crotia, Estonia, Germany, Greece, Hungry, Korea, Mexico, New Zealand, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, Puerto Rico, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States from February 2007 to September 2008. The total study duration was 30 weeks (W).

Total of 639 par. were screened out of which 581 were randomized and 58 were placebo run-in failures. Analysis population included 579 par. of 581 randomized participants as 2 par. did not take study drug: 1 from placebo and 1 from donepezil arm.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Placebo
Par. in this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
Par. in this arm received rosiglitazone extended release (RSGXR) 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
Par. in this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4W of treatment. From Visit 4 (W4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
Par. in this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4W of treatment. From Visit 4 (W4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Overall Study
STARTED
165
166
165
83
Overall Study
COMPLETED
131
135
127
55
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
34
31
38
28

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Placebo
Par. in this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
Par. in this arm received rosiglitazone extended release (RSGXR) 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
Par. in this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4W of treatment. From Visit 4 (W4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
Par. in this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4W of treatment. From Visit 4 (W4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Overall Study
Adverse Event
10
8
10
11
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
3
6
1
4
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
3
1
3
3
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
10
12
15
5
Overall Study
Sponsor terminated study
0
1
0
0
Overall Study
Non-compliance
4
0
1
3
Overall Study
Par. did not returned to visit
1
0
0
1
Overall Study
Follow-Up visit not possible
1
0
0
0
Overall Study
Prohibited medication used for SAE
1
0
0
0
Overall Study
Death of par.
1
0
1
0
Overall Study
Visit 7 exceed the visit window
0
1
0
0
Overall Study
Medical monitor terminated par.
0
1
0
0
Overall Study
Mental status of par. was
0
1
0
0
Overall Study
Worsening of AD
0
0
1
0
Overall Study
Excluded for concerning QTc value
0
0
1
0
Overall Study
Insufficient AD documentation
0
0
1
0
Overall Study
High MMSE scores
0
0
1
0
Overall Study
Deterioration of cognitive status
0
0
1
0
Overall Study
Serious adverse event
0
0
1
0
Overall Study
Excluded for heart insufficiency
0
0
1
0
Overall Study
Raised Creatinine Value
0
0
0
1

Baseline Characteristics

Rosiglitazone (Extended Release Tablets) As Monotherapy In Subjects With Mild To Moderate Alzheimer's Disease

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Par. in this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=162 Participants
Par. in this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=156 Participants
Par. in this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4W of treatment. From Visit 4 (W4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Par. in this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4W of treatment. From Visit 4 (W4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Total
n=553 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
72.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.56 • n=5 Participants
71.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.91 • n=7 Participants
72.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.63 • n=5 Participants
72.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.97 • n=4 Participants
72.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.30 • n=21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
95 Participants
n=5 Participants
103 Participants
n=7 Participants
101 Participants
n=5 Participants
48 Participants
n=4 Participants
347 Participants
n=21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
64 Participants
n=5 Participants
59 Participants
n=7 Participants
55 Participants
n=5 Participants
28 Participants
n=4 Participants
206 Participants
n=21 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
4 Participants
n=21 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
50 Participants
n=7 Participants
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
14 Participants
n=4 Participants
134 Participants
n=21 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
7 Participants
n=21 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
123 Participants
n=5 Participants
109 Participants
n=7 Participants
112 Participants
n=5 Participants
57 Participants
n=4 Participants
401 Participants
n=21 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
7 Participants
n=21 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=21 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and W24

Population: ITT Population. Only those par. available at the indicated time points were analyzed. These comparisons were conducted for APOE e4 negative (neg) par. (e2/e2, e2/e3, and e3/e3) cohort

The 11-item ADAS-Cog assessed a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Items were evaluated by tests and clinician ratings on a 5-point scale. Scores ranged from 0-70 with higher scores indicates more dysfunction. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline is defined as value at W0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for the two rosiglitazone dose groups and the three genetic subgroups. There was no adjustment for the donepezil versus placebo comparisons, which were included to assess the sensitivity of the trial to detect a treatment effect.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=63 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=69 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=65 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=28 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean ADAS-Cog Total Score at W24 as a Function of APOE e4 Status in Apolipoprotein epsilon4 (APOE e4) Negative Cohort
1.6 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.78
-0.2 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.67
0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.67
0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Error 1.16

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and W24

Population: ITT Population. Only those par. available at the indicated time points were analyzed. These comparisons were conducted in all except e4/e4's: comprised of APOE e4 neg par. (e2/e2, e2/e3, and e3/e3) and APOE e4 heterozygote par. (e2/e4, e3/e4)

The 11-item ADAS-Cog assessed a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Items were evaluated by tests and clinician ratings on a 5-point scale. Scores ranged from 0-70 with higher scores indicates more dysfunction. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline is defined as value at W0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for the two rosiglitazone dose groups and the three genetic subgroups. There was no adjustment for the donepezil versus placebo comparisons, which were included to assess the sensitivity of the trial to detect a treatment effect.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=117 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=115 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=112 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=49 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean ADAS-Cog Total Score at W24 as a Function of APOE e4 Status in All Except e4/e4's Cohort
1.5 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.58
0.3 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.54
0.7 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.57
-0.1 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.79

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and W24

Population: ITT Population

The 11-item ADAS-Cog assessed a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Items were evaluated by tests and clinician ratings on a 5-point scale. Scores ranged from 0-70 with higher scores indicates more dysfunction. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline is defined as value at W0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for the two rosiglitazone dose groups and the three genetic subgroups. There was no adjustment for the donepezil versus placebo comparisons, which were included to assess the sensitivity of the trial to detect a treatment effect.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=131 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=130 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=125 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=56 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean ADAS-Cog Total Score at W24 as a Function of APOE e4 Status in Full Population Cohort
2.0 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.56
1.2 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.53
1.2 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.55
0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.74

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and W24

Population: ITT Population. Only those par. available at the indicated time points were analyzed. These comparisons were conducted in APOE e4 negative (neg) par. (e2/e2, e2/e3, and e3/e3).

The CIBIC+ assessment comprised of a 7-point rating of severity (at baseline) and change (at indicated time points). It was rated on a scale of 1 to 7 as 1: markedly improved, 2.: moderately improved, 3: minimally improved, 4: no change, 5: minimally worse, 6: moderately worse and 7: markedly worse; higher score means greater dysfunction. It was based on interviews with the par. and caregiver by an independent rater. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0. Endpoint treatment differences which were adjusted to take account of missing data are derived. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for the two rosiglitazone dose groups and the three genetic subgroups. There was no adjustment for the donepezil versus placebo comparisons, which were included to assess the sensitivity of the trial to detect a treatment effect.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=63 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=71 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=66 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=28 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean CIBIC+ Global Functioning Total Score at W24 as a Function of APOE e4 Status in APOE4 Negative Cohort
4.2 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
4.2 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
4.1 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
3.9 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.22

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and W24

Population: ITT Population. Only those par. available at the indicated time points were analyzed. These comparisons were conducted in all except e4/e4's: comprised of APOE e4 neg par. (e2/e2, e2/e3, and e3/e3) and APOE e4 heterozygote par. (e2/e4, e3/e4)

The CIBIC+ assessment comprised of a 7-point rating of severity (at baseline) and change (at indicated time points). It was rated on a scale of 1 to 7 as 1: markedly improved, 2.: moderately improved, 3: minimally improved, 4: no change, 5: minimally worse, 6: moderately worse and 7: markedly worse; higher score means greater dysfunction. It was based on interviews with the par. and caregiver by an independent rater. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0. Endpoint treatment differences which were adjusted to take account of missing data are derived. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for the two rosiglitazone dose groups and the three genetic subgroups. There was no adjustment for the donepezil versus placebo comparisons, which were included to assess the sensitivity of the trial to detect a treatment effect.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=117 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=117 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=114 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=49 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean CIBIC+ Global Functioning Total Score at W24 as a Function of APOE e4 Status in All Except e4/e4's Cohort
4.3 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
4.3 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
4.1 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
3.8 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.17

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and W24

Population: ITT Population. Only those par. available at the indicated time points were analyzed. These comparisons were conducted in full population.

The CIBIC+ assessment comprised of a 7-point rating of severity (at baseline) and change (at indicated time points). It was rated on a scale of 1 to 7 as 1: markedly improved, 2.: moderately improved, 3: minimally improved, 4: no change, 5: minimally worse, 6: moderately worse and 7: markedly worse; higher score means greater dysfunction. It was based on interviews with the par. and caregiver by an independent rater. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0. Endpoint treatment differences which were adjusted to take account of missing data are derived. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for the two rosiglitazone dose groups and the three genetic subgroups. There was no adjustment for the donepezil versus placebo comparisons, which were included to assess the sensitivity of the trial to detect a treatment effect.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=131 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=133 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=127 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=56 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean CIBIC+ Global Functioning Total Score at W24 as a Function of APOE e4 Status in Full Population Cohort
4.3 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
4.3 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
4.2 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
3.8 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.16

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and up to W24

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented as n=x,x,x,x in the category titles).

The 11-item ADAS-Cog assessed a range of cognitive abilities including memory, comprehension, orientation in time and place and spontaneous speech. Most items were evaluated by tests, but some were dependent on clinician ratings on a 5-point scale. Scores ranged from 0-70 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline is defined as value at W0. Endpoint treatment differences were adjusted to take account of missing data. It was evaluated at Baseline, W8, W16 and W24.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=162 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=156 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean ADAS-Cog Total Score at W8, W16, W24
ADAS-Cog, W24, n=131, 130,125,156
2.0 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.56
1.2 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.53
1.2 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.55
0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.74
Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean ADAS-Cog Total Score at W8, W16, W24
ADAS-Cog, W8, n=153, 155,147,67
0.4 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.42
-0.5 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.45
0.5 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.43
-0.3 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.63
Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean ADAS-Cog Total Score at W8, W16, W24
ADAS-Cog, W16, n=143,145,132,62
0.5 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.46
0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.49
1.3 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.45
-1.1 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.80

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and up to W24

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented as n=x,x,x,x in the category titles).

The CIBIC+ assessment comprised of a 7-point rating of severity (at baseline) and change (at indicated time points). It was rated on a scale of 1 to 7 as 1: markedly improved, 2.: moderately improved, 3: minimally improved, 4: no change, 5: minimally worse, 6: moderately worse and 7: markedly worse; higher score means more dysfunction. The scale was based on interviews with the par. and caregiver and was completed by an independent rater. It required separate structured 15-20 minute interviews with the par. and caregiver. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0. Endpoint treatment differences which were adjusted to take account of missing data are derived. It was evaluated at Baseline, W8, W16 and W24.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=162 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=156 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean CIBIC+ Global Functioning Total Score at W8, W16, W24
CIBIC+, W8, n=150, 156,147,67
4.1 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
3.9 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
4.1 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
3.9 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean CIBIC+ Global Functioning Total Score at W8, W16, W24
CIBIC+, W16, n=144,145,127,61
4.2 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
4.0 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
4.1 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
3.8 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean CIBIC+ Global Functioning Total Score at W8, W16, W24
CIBIC+, W24, n=131,133, 127, 56
4.3 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
4.3 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
4.2 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
3.8 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.16

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and up to W24

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented as n=x,x,x,x in the category titles). Endpoint treatment differences which were adjusted to take account of missing data are derived.

The NPI assessed behavioral disturbances comprises 10 dimensions: delusions, hallucinations, dysphoria, apathy, euphoria, disinhibition, aggressiveness and agitation, irritability, anxiety and aberrant motor activity. The par. caregiver asked about behavior in the par. If "Yes", the informant then rates both the severity on a 3-point scale, 1: mild to 3: severe (total range: 0-36) and the frequency using a 4-point scale, 1: occasionally to 4: very frequently. The total domain score was frequency × severity. The distress was scored on 5-point scale, 0: no distress to 5 - very severe or extreme. A total NPI score can be calculated by adding all domain scores together; NPI total score: from 0-144 and NPI distress score: from 0-60, all with higher scores indicating more severe behavioral disturbance. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=162 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=156 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score at W8, W16, W24
NPI, W8, n=146,151,144,65
0.2 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.59
0.1 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.63
0.5 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.81
-0.1 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.87
Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score at W8, W16, W24
NPI, W16, n=139,142,131,59
-0.1 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.69
-0.0 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.69
-0.1 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.90
0.5 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.97
Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score at W8, W16, W24
NPI, W24, n=129,133,127,55
1.2 Score on a scale
Standard Error 1.04
1.6 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.74
1.1 Score on a scale
Standard Error 1.01
-0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Error 1.12

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and up to W24

Population: ITT Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented as n=x,x,x,x in the category titles).

The DAD, assessed the ability of a par. to execute basic and instrumental activities of daily living (ADL) and leisure activities. The scale consists of 40 questions assessing basic and instrumental ADLs. This scale assesses a participants' ability to initiate, plan, and perform activities related to hygiene, dressing, continence, eating, meal preparation, telephoning, going on an outing, finance and correspondence, medications, leisure, and housework. Each item was scored as yes: 1, no: 0 and N/A: not applicable. Higher scores indicate less disability with a score of 100 indicating no disability and 0 indicating no functional ability. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0. The percentage score was calculated as (DAD total score/total number of applicable items) multiplied by 100. Endpoint treatment differences which were adjusted to take account of missing data are derived.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=162 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=156 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) Scale Total Score at W8, W16, W24
DAD, W8, n=147,152, 144, 65
-0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.80
-0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.94
-0.3 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.78
0.5 Score on a scale
Standard Error 1.00
Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) Scale Total Score at W8, W16, W24
DAD, W16, n=141,143,131,59
-2.6 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.98
-1.7 Score on a scale
Standard Error 1.07
-1.7 Score on a scale
Standard Error 1.05
1.1 Score on a scale
Standard Error 1.40
Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) Scale Total Score at W8, W16, W24
DAD, W24, n=129,133,127,55
-3.7 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.97
-2.4 Score on a scale
Standard Error 1.21
-3.8 Score on a scale
Standard Error 1.19
-0.2 Score on a scale
Standard Error 1.81

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and up to W24

Population: ITT Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented as n=x,x,x,x in the category titles).

Change from Baseline in short term memory assessment score was assessed from a combined analysis of items 1 (word recall task) and 7 (word recognition task) of ADAS-Cog scale. Word recall task consist of the participants score was the mean number of words not recalled on three trials (maximum score 10) and word recognition task, to score this item the number of incorrect responses was counted (maximum error score was 12). Higher score indicating greater dysfunction. Total score is sum of individual score. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0. Endpoint treatment differences which were adjusted to take account of missing data are derived.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=162 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=156 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean Short Term Memory Assessment Total Score (ADAS-Cog Q1 Plus Q7) at W8, W16, W24
ADAS-Cog Q1 plus Q7, W16, n=143,143,130,62
0.1 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.27
0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.26
0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.24
-0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.45
Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean Short Term Memory Assessment Total Score (ADAS-Cog Q1 Plus Q7) at W8, W16, W24
ADAS-Cog Q1 plus Q7, W24, n=131,128,123,56
0.7 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.27
0.3 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.30
0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.29
0.2 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.43
Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean Short Term Memory Assessment Total Score (ADAS-Cog Q1 Plus Q7) at W8, W16, W24
ADAS-Cog Q1 plus Q7, W8, n=152,155,146,67
0.1 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.25
-0.1 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.27
0.5 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.25
-0.4 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.40

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and up to W24

Population: ITT Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented as n=x,x,x,x in the category titles).

The EQ-5D Proxy was a 2 part scale used to assess the quality of life and utility benefit. The data for Part 1 is presented. It is a 5 dimensional Health State Classification. Caregivers were asked to respond as they feel the par. would on dimensions of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Answers to each question were recorded on a 3-point scale which indicates the level of impairment (level 1= no problem; level 2=some or moderate problem(s) and level 3=unable, or extreme problem with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction. EQ-5D Proxy assessments was performed at Baseline, W12 and W24. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0. Endpoint treatment differences which were adjusted to take account of missing data are derived.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=162 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=156 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean European Quality of Life -5 Dimensions Proxy Version (EQ-5D Proxy) Total Score at W12, W24 Assessed by Utility
EQ-5D Proxy Utility, W12, n=141,146, 135, 62
-0.02 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.017
0.00 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.016
0.01 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.016
0.01 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.021
Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean European Quality of Life -5 Dimensions Proxy Version (EQ-5D Proxy) Total Score at W12, W24 Assessed by Utility
EQ-5D Proxy Utility, W24, n=128, 130, 125, 55
-0.02 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.017
0.02 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.016
-0.02 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.019
0.00 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.018

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and up to W24

Population: ITT Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented as n=x,x,x,x in the category titles).

The EQ-5D Proxy is a 2 part scale used to assess the quality of life and utility benefit. The data for Part 2 is presented. It is a the visual analogue scale Thermometer which assessed caregiver's impression of par. overall health. The Thermometer has endpoints of 100 (best imaginable health state) and 0 (worst imaginable health state). EQ-5D Proxy assessments was performed at Baseline, W12 and W24. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0. Endpoint treatment differences which were adjusted to take account of missing data are derived.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=162 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=156 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean European Quality of Life -5 Dimensions Proxy Version (EQ-5D Proxy) Total Score at W12, W24 Assessed by Thermometer (Visual Analog Scale [VAS])
EQ-5D Proxy Thermometer, W12, n=141, 146, 135, 62
1.4 Score on a scale
Standard Error 1.35
0.3 Score on a scale
Standard Error 1.37
1.7 Score on a scale
Standard Error 1.41
-2.6 Score on a scale
Standard Error 2.41
Change From Baseline (W0) in Mean European Quality of Life -5 Dimensions Proxy Version (EQ-5D Proxy) Total Score at W12, W24 Assessed by Thermometer (Visual Analog Scale [VAS])
EQ-5D Proxy Thermometer, W24, n=128, 130, 126, 55
1.9 Score on a scale
Standard Error 1.56
-0.7 Score on a scale
Standard Error 1.52
0.2 Score on a scale
Standard Error 1.71
1.5 Score on a scale
Standard Error 2.40

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and up to W24

Population: ITT Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented as n=x,x,x,x in the category titles).

The RUD instrument was developed as a comprehensive tool to assess the amount of resource use among demented par. RUD assess both formal and informal resource use of the par. and the primary caregiver, making it possible to calculate costs from a societal perspective. Q1 relates to assisting par. with basic activities of daily living and Q2 relates to instrumental activities of daily living. The assessments was performed at Baseline, W12 and W24. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0. Endpoint treatment differences which were adjusted to take account of missing data are derived.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=162 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=156 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Time Spent Caring for Basic and Instrumental Activities Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD) Scale at W12 and W24
RUD Q1, W12, n=141, 149, 137, 69
2.3 Hours
Standard Deviation 43.31
4.5 Hours
Standard Deviation 81.21
-9.8 Hours
Standard Deviation 77.44
-5.7 Hours
Standard Deviation 70.19
Time Spent Caring for Basic and Instrumental Activities Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD) Scale at W12 and W24
RUD Q1, W24, n=128, 133, 127, 55
19.4 Hours
Standard Deviation 109.41
-0.6 Hours
Standard Deviation 58.72
-2.7 Hours
Standard Deviation 86.26
3.7 Hours
Standard Deviation 19.26
Time Spent Caring for Basic and Instrumental Activities Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD) Scale at W12 and W24
RUD Q2, W12, n=141, 149, 137, 62
13.7 Hours
Standard Deviation 73.94
9.0 Hours
Standard Deviation 60.54
4.9 Hours
Standard Deviation 80.97
-5.3 Hours
Standard Deviation 56.50
Time Spent Caring for Basic and Instrumental Activities Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD) Scale at W12 and W24
RUD Q2, W24, n=128, 133, 127, 55
17.1 Hours
Standard Deviation 75.45
9.7 Hours
Standard Deviation 47.96
11.6 Hours
Standard Deviation 107.52
1.1 Hours
Standard Deviation 61.49

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and up to W24

Population: ITT Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented as n=x,x,x,x in the category titles).

The ACQLI was an assessment of caregiver quality of life. This instrument consists of 30 questions exploring various aspects of carer's quality of life. Each of the questions had a two point response and the 30 questions were summed to provide a total score. Items are assumed to be unidimensional (i.e., represent a single variable) and are scored 0/1 (false/true) before summation into a total score with a 0-30 range. To ease comparisons between scales, ACQLI scores were transformed to range between 0-100 (100: worse). The assessments was performed at Baseline, W12 and W24. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0. Endpoint treatment differences which were adjusted to take account of missing data are derived.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=162 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=156 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=76 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Change From Baseline (W0) in Alzheimer's Carer's Quality of Life Instrument (ACQLI) Score at W12 and W24.
ACQLI, W12, n=141, 148, 137, 60
0.5 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.38
-0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.41
-0.1 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.46
0.5 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.50
Change From Baseline (W0) in Alzheimer's Carer's Quality of Life Instrument (ACQLI) Score at W12 and W24.
ACQLI, W24, n=128, 132, 126, 54
0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.45
-0.2 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.49
0.0 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.54
-0.0 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.69

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and W24

Population: ITT Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented as n=x,x,x,x in the category titles).

The MMSE consists of 11 tests of orientation, memory (recent and immediate), concentration, language and praxis. Scores range from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment. The scale is completed by the investigator, based on the performance of the par. and takes approximately 5 to 10 minutes to administer. The assessments was performed at Baseline and W24. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0. Endpoint treatment differences which were adjusted to take account of missing data are derived

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=131 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=133 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=127 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=56 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Change From Baseline (W0) in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score at W24.
-0.5 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.27
-0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.27
-0.7 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.28
0.4 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.38

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and W24

Population: ITT Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented as n=x,x,x,x in the category titles).

The blood sample was collected for assessments of HbA1c levels at Baseline and W24. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0. Endpoint treatment differences which were adjusted to take account of missing data are derived.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=123 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=120 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=117 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=52 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Change From Baseline (W0) in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at W24.
0.1 Percentage (%)
Standard Error 0.05
0.2 Percentage (%)
Standard Error 0.05
0.1 Percentage (%)
Standard Error 0.05
0.1 Percentage (%)
Standard Error 0.07

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to W24

Population: Safety population: This included all par. randomized to treatment who have taken at least one dose of study medication.

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE included significant or unexpected worsening or exacerbation of the condition/indication under study, exacerbation of a chronic or intermittent pre-existing condition, new conditions detected or diagnosed, signs, symptoms, or the clinical sequelae of a suspected overdose of either investigational product or a concurrent medication. Number of participants with any AE and as per severity were reported. Refer to the general AE/SAE module for a list of AEs and SAEs.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=165 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=166 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=165 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=83 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Defined by Severity
Any AE
62 Participants
60 Participants
69 Participants
42 Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Defined by Severity
Mild AE
32 Participants
35 Participants
37 Participants
22 Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Defined by Severity
Moderate AE
25 Participants
22 Participants
30 Participants
15 Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Defined by Severity
Severe AE
5 Participants
3 Participants
2 Participants
5 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to W24

Population: Safety Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented as n=x,x,x,x in the category titles).

SBP, DBP and HR of par. were recorded in sitting posture as vital signs, while body weight was measured without shoes and wearing light clothing at each visit. The blood pressure (BP) and HR values were identified as of PCC if the vales were out of the reference range (for SBP, 90 to 140 millimeters of mercury (mmHg), DBP, 50 to 90 mmHg, and HR \>100 or \<50 beats per minute \[bpm\]) or meet a change from Baseline criterion. For SBP it was increase from Baseline (high) if increased by more than or equal to (\>=) 40 mmHg; decrease from Baseline (low) if decreased by \>=30 mmHg. For DBP, increase from Baseline (high) if increased by \>=30 mmHg; decrease from Baseline (low) if decreased by \>=20 mmHg. For HR, increase from Baseline (high) if increased by \>=30 bpm; decrease from Baseline (low) if decreased by \>=30 bpm. For weight, increase from Baseline (high) if increased by \>=7%; decrease from Baseline (low) if decreased by \>=7%. Baseline was defined as value at W0.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=160 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=162 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=154 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=79 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Number of Participants With Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (SBP and DBP), Heart Rate (HR) and Weight Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) Any Time on Treatment (ATOT).
SBP, >140 or <90
52 Participants
61 Participants
41 Participants
24 Participants
Number of Participants With Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (SBP and DBP), Heart Rate (HR) and Weight Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) Any Time on Treatment (ATOT).
SBP, Increase from Baseline >=40
1 Participants
3 Participants
3 Participants
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (SBP and DBP), Heart Rate (HR) and Weight Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) Any Time on Treatment (ATOT).
SBP, Decrease from Baseline >=30
7 Participants
9 Participants
15 Participants
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (SBP and DBP), Heart Rate (HR) and Weight Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) Any Time on Treatment (ATOT).
DBP, >90 or <50
17 Participants
16 Participants
13 Participants
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (SBP and DBP), Heart Rate (HR) and Weight Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) Any Time on Treatment (ATOT).
DBP, Increase from Baseline >=30
4 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (SBP and DBP), Heart Rate (HR) and Weight Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) Any Time on Treatment (ATOT).
DBP, Decrease from Baseline >=20
8 Participants
12 Participants
25 Participants
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (SBP and DBP), Heart Rate (HR) and Weight Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) Any Time on Treatment (ATOT).
HR, >100 or <50
2 Participants
4 Participants
4 Participants
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (SBP and DBP), Heart Rate (HR) and Weight Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) Any Time on Treatment (ATOT).
HR, Increase from Baseline >=30
1 Participants
3 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (SBP and DBP), Heart Rate (HR) and Weight Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) Any Time on Treatment (ATOT).
HR, Decrease from Baseline >=30
3 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (SBP and DBP), Heart Rate (HR) and Weight Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) Any Time on Treatment (ATOT).
Weight, Increase from Baseline >=7%
9 Participants
21 Participants
25 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (SBP and DBP), Heart Rate (HR) and Weight Values of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) Any Time on Treatment (ATOT).
Weight, Decrease from Baseline >=7%
7 Participants
4 Participants
3 Participants
5 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and up to W24

Population: Safety Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented as n=x,x,x,x in the category titles).

Triplicate 12-lead ECG measures was obtained digitally, approximately one minute apart after the par. had rested in the supine position in a quiet room (no TV, minimal talking) for at least 10 minutes. Conduction intervals from the 12-lead ECGs were manually read and confirmed by an external cardiologist/vendor. The ECG parameters includes PR interval, QRS duration, QT - uncorrected interval, QTc Bazett (QTcB), QTc Fridericia (QTcF) and RR interval of Central Cardiologist are reported. The assessments was performed at Baseline and W24. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Screening/Visit 1/W-6.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=165 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=166 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=165 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=83 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Change From Baseline (W0) in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)
PR Interval, n=16,11, 14, 4
2.2 milliseconds (MSEC)
Standard Deviation 14.39
6.9 milliseconds (MSEC)
Standard Deviation 30.44
6.0 milliseconds (MSEC)
Standard Deviation 19.98
-5.5 milliseconds (MSEC)
Standard Deviation 8.50
Change From Baseline (W0) in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)
QRS Duration, n=17, 11, 14, 5
1.1 milliseconds (MSEC)
Standard Deviation 8.28
0.7 milliseconds (MSEC)
Standard Deviation 5.50
3.6 milliseconds (MSEC)
Standard Deviation 6.14
0.9 milliseconds (MSEC)
Standard Deviation 9.04
Change From Baseline (W0) in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)
QT Interval, n=17, 11, 14, 5
5.3 milliseconds (MSEC)
Standard Deviation 27.69
15.6 milliseconds (MSEC)
Standard Deviation 25.06
19.8 milliseconds (MSEC)
Standard Deviation 22.17
15.9 milliseconds (MSEC)
Standard Deviation 22.57
Change From Baseline (W0) in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)
QTcB, n=17, 11, 14, 5
10.2 milliseconds (MSEC)
Standard Deviation 18.21
7.1 milliseconds (MSEC)
Standard Deviation 22.69
20.0 milliseconds (MSEC)
Standard Deviation 13.54
-0.2 milliseconds (MSEC)
Standard Deviation 17.22
Change From Baseline (W0) in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)
QTcF, n=17, 11, 14, 5
8.1 milliseconds (MSEC)
Standard Deviation 17.12
10.0 milliseconds (MSEC)
Standard Deviation 21.47
20.1 milliseconds (MSEC)
Standard Deviation 12.71
4.9 milliseconds (MSEC)
Standard Deviation 15.50
Change From Baseline (W0) in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)
RR Interval
-12.3 milliseconds (MSEC)
Standard Deviation 107.35
43.8 milliseconds (MSEC)
Standard Deviation 89.52
-0.5 milliseconds (MSEC)
Standard Deviation 107.49
76.5 milliseconds (MSEC)
Standard Deviation 109.43

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and up to W24

Population: Safety Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented as n=x,x,x,x in the category titles).

Triplicate 12-lead ECG measures was obtained digitally, approximately one minute apart after the par. had rested in the supine position in a quiet room (no TV, minimal talking) for at least 10 minutes. Conduction intervals from the 12-lead ECGs were manually read and confirmed by an external cardiologist/vendor. The ECG HR of Central Cardiologist reported. The assessments was performed at Baseline and W24. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Screening/Visit 1/W-6.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=17 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=11 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=14 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=5 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Change From Baseline (W0) in Heart Rate (HR) Measured From 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)
2.1 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 12.08
-2.8 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 7.77
-0.3 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 8.39
-4.7 Beats per minute
Standard Deviation 9.23

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and up to W24

Population: Safety Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented as n=x,x,x,x in the category titles).

Body weight will be measured at all visits, without shoes and wearing light clothing. The assessments was performed at Baseline, W4, W8, W12, W16, and W24. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=165 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=166 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=165 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=83 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Change From Baseline (W0) in Body Weight
Week 4, n=160, 161, 153, 79
0.1 Kilogram (Kg)
Standard Deviation 1.59
0.4 Kilogram (Kg)
Standard Deviation 1.76
0.3 Kilogram (Kg)
Standard Deviation 1.61
-0.1 Kilogram (Kg)
Standard Deviation 1.39
Change From Baseline (W0) in Body Weight
Week 8, n=150, 157, 147, 66
-0.0 Kilogram (Kg)
Standard Deviation 2.56
0.5 Kilogram (Kg)
Standard Deviation 1.73
0.8 Kilogram (Kg)
Standard Deviation 2.16
-0.4 Kilogram (Kg)
Standard Deviation 1.46
Change From Baseline (W0) in Body Weight
Week 12, n=143, 149, 136, 61
0.0 Kilogram (Kg)
Standard Deviation 2.12
0.6 Kilogram (Kg)
Standard Deviation 2.06
0.9 Kilogram (Kg)
Standard Deviation 2.03
-0.9 Kilogram (Kg)
Standard Deviation 1.71
Change From Baseline (W0) in Body Weight
Week 16, n=143, 146, 132, 61
-0.0 Kilogram (Kg)
Standard Deviation 2.05
0.7 Kilogram (Kg)
Standard Deviation 2.20
1.1 Kilogram (Kg)
Standard Deviation 2.08
-1.0 Kilogram (Kg)
Standard Deviation 2.05
Change From Baseline (W0) in Body Weight
Week 24, 133, 132, 125, 55
-0.3 Kilogram (Kg)
Standard Deviation 2.53
0.8 Kilogram (Kg)
Standard Deviation 2.63
0.8 Kilogram (Kg)
Standard Deviation 2.54
-0.8 Kilogram (Kg)
Standard Deviation 2.28

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and up to W24

Population: Safety Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented as n=x,x,x,x in the category titles).

Hematology parameters were assessed at Baseline, W4, W12 and W24. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=165 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=166 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=165 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=83 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Change From Baseline (W0) in Hemoglobin
Week 4, n=152, 152, 138, 76
0.1 Grams per liter (G/L)
Standard Deviation 5.84
-2.8 Grams per liter (G/L)
Standard Deviation 7.04
-3.9 Grams per liter (G/L)
Standard Deviation 7.57
-0.4 Grams per liter (G/L)
Standard Deviation 6.03
Change From Baseline (W0) in Hemoglobin
Week 12, n=132, 142, 132, 60
-0.2 Grams per liter (G/L)
Standard Deviation 6.55
-4.5 Grams per liter (G/L)
Standard Deviation 8.65
-10.5 Grams per liter (G/L)
Standard Deviation 8.67
-0.6 Grams per liter (G/L)
Standard Deviation 6.59
Change From Baseline (W0) in Hemoglobin
Week 24, n=128, 124, 115, 54
-1.3 Grams per liter (G/L)
Standard Deviation 7.54
-4.2 Grams per liter (G/L)
Standard Deviation 8.34
-11.9 Grams per liter (G/L)
Standard Deviation 10.58
0.2 Grams per liter (G/L)
Standard Deviation 6.51

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and Up to W24

Population: Safety Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented as n=x,x,x,x in the category titles).

Hematology parameters were assessed at Baseline, W4, W12 and W24. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=165 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=166 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=165 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=83 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Change From Baseline (W0) in Hematocrit
Week 4, n=152, 152, 138, 76
-0.0011 Percentage of red blood cells in blood
Standard Deviation 0.01886
-0.0088 Percentage of red blood cells in blood
Standard Deviation 0.02285
-0.0125 Percentage of red blood cells in blood
Standard Deviation 0.02322
-0.0024 Percentage of red blood cells in blood
Standard Deviation 0.01829
Change From Baseline (W0) in Hematocrit
Week 12, n=132, 142, 132, 60
-0.0007 Percentage of red blood cells in blood
Standard Deviation 0.02137
-0.0152 Percentage of red blood cells in blood
Standard Deviation 0.02813
-0.0316 Percentage of red blood cells in blood
Standard Deviation 0.02629
-0.0055 Percentage of red blood cells in blood
Standard Deviation 0.01932
Change From Baseline (W0) in Hematocrit
Week 24, n=128, 124, 115, 54
-0.0010 Percentage of red blood cells in blood
Standard Deviation 0.02500
-0.0123 Percentage of red blood cells in blood
Standard Deviation 0.02304
-0.0326 Percentage of red blood cells in blood
Standard Deviation 0.03195
-0.0001 Percentage of red blood cells in blood
Standard Deviation 0.02135

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (W0) and up to W24

Population: Safety Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented as n=x,x,x,x in the category titles).

HbA1c assessment was performed par. with type 2 diabetes mellitus or HbA1c \>=6.5% at Screening only. HbA1c levels were assessed at Baseline, W12 and W24. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at W0.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=165 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=166 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=165 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=83 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Change From Baseline (W0) in Periodic HbA1c Assessment
Week 12, n=48, 46, 38, 22
-0.1 Percentage
Standard Deviation 0.56
0.2 Percentage
Standard Deviation 0.62
0.1 Percentage
Standard Deviation 0.41
-0.2 Percentage
Standard Deviation 0.81
Change From Baseline (W0) in Periodic HbA1c Assessment
Week 24, n=123, 120, 117, 52
0.1 Percentage
Standard Deviation 0.52
0.2 Percentage
Standard Deviation 0.66
0.1 Percentage
Standard Deviation 0.52
0.0 Percentage
Standard Deviation 0.56

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to W24

Population: Safety Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented as n=x,x,x,x in the category titles).

Haematology parameters were identified as of PCC (high \[H\], low \[L\]), if the values were out of the reference range (RR). The range for parameters was: platelet (100AV-500AV), red blood cell (RBC, 0.8-1.2), hemoglobin (L: female \[F\]:10, male \[M\]:11; H: F:16.5-AV, M:18), hematocrit (0.8-1.2), white blood cell (WBC, 3-15), neutrophils (0.75-1.5), lymphocytes (0.75-1.5), monocytes (0.75-2), eosinophils (none-2), basophils (none-2), mean corpuscle volume (MCV, 0.8-1.2), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH, 0.8-1.2), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC, 0.8-1.2), red cell distribution width (RDW, 0.8-1.2). Data for mean platelet volume (reference range not established) not reported

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=165 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=166 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=165 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=83 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Number of Par. With Hematology Data of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
WBC H, n=157, 161,151, 76
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Par. With Hematology Data of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
Platelet H, n=157, 160,150, 76
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Par. With Hematology Data of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
Eosinophils H, n=156, 161, 151, 72
2 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Par. With Hematology Data of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
Hematocrit H, n=157, 161,151, 76
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Par. With Hematology Data of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
Hematocrit L, n=157, 161,151, 76
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Par. With Hematology Data of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
Hemoglobin H, n=157, 161,151, 76
0 Participants
2 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Par. With Hematology Data of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
Hemoglobin L, n=157, 161,151, 76
0 Participants
3 Participants
8 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Par. With Hematology Data of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
Lymphocytes L, n=156, 161,151, 76
2 Participants
2 Participants
2 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Par. With Hematology Data of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
MCH H, n=157, 161,151, 76
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Par. With Hematology Data of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
MCH L, n=157, 161,151, 76
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Par. With Hematology Data of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
MCV L, n=156, 161,151, 76
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Par. With Hematology Data of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
Monocytes H, n=156, 161,151, 76
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Par. With Hematology Data of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
Monocytes L, n=156, 161,151, 76
9 Participants
10 Participants
15 Participants
4 Participants
Number of Par. With Hematology Data of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
Platelet L, n=157, 160,150, 76
2 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Par. With Hematology Data of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
RDW H, n=157, 161,151, 76
4 Participants
6 Participants
10 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Par. With Hematology Data of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
RBC L, n=157, 161,151, 76
0 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Par. With Hematology Data of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
Total neutrophil H, n=156, 161, 151, 76
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Par. With Hematology Data of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
Total neutrophil L, n=156, 161, 151, 76
2 Participants
5 Participants
7 Participants
3 Participants
Number of Par. With Hematology Data of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
WBC L, n=157, 161,151, 76
4 Participants
4 Participants
7 Participants
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to W24

Population: Safety Population. Only those par. available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented as n=x,x,x,x in the category titles).

Clinical chemistry parameters were identified as of PCC (H, L), if values were out of RR: Alanine aminotransferase (ALT, none-120 \[250% upper limit of RR, ULRR\]), Albumin (0.75-2), Aspartate aminotransferase (AST,none-105 (3-64y), 137.5 (65+y), \>250%ULRR), Alkaline phosphatase (ALP,none-312.5 (20+y), \>250%ULRR), blood urea nitrogen (BUN)/Creatinine ratio (none-1.25), BUN (none-11), Chloride (80-115), Calcium (0.75-1.25), Carbon dioxide (CO2, 15-40) content, Creatinine (22, \<50% lower limit of RR \[LLRR\]-155, \>125%ULRR), Creatine phosphokinase (CPK, none-1.25), Gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT,none-2.5), Glucose (3.6-7.8), High density lipoprotein (HDL,0.65-none), Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH,none-1.25), Low density lipoprotein (LDL,none-2), Magnesium (0.5-2), Potassium (3-5.5), Phosphorus inorganic (0.5-1.5), Sodium (130-150), Total protein (0.8-1.5), Total cholesterol (none-1.25), Total bilirubin (none-1.95), Triglycerides (none-9). Data for Creatinine clearance not reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=165 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=166 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=165 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=83 Participants
Par. randomized to this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Number of Par. With Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
ALT H, n=156, 162, 151, 77
2 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Par. With Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
AST H, n=156, 162, 151, 77
2 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Par. With Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
BUN/Creatinine ratio H, n=156, 162, 151, 77
8 Participants
8 Participants
19 Participants
9 Participants
Number of Par. With Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
Cholesterol H, n=141, 148, 137, 62
7 Participants
17 Participants
29 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Par. With Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
Creatinine H, n=156, 162, 151, 77
5 Participants
1 Participants
4 Participants
3 Participants
Number of Par. With Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
CPK H, n=156, 162, 151, 77
5 Participants
13 Participants
11 Participants
5 Participants
Number of Par. With Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
GGT H, n=156, 162, 151, 77
2 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Par. With Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
Glucose H, n=156, 162, 151, 77
12 Participants
19 Participants
9 Participants
8 Participants
Number of Par. With Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
Glucose L, n=156, 162, 151, 77
3 Participants
5 Participants
4 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Par. With Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
LDL H, n=141, 147, 136, 62
36 Participants
51 Participants
55 Participants
10 Participants
Number of Par. With Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
Phosphorus L, n=156, 162, 151, 77
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Par. With Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
Potassium H, n=156, 162, 150, 77
4 Participants
2 Participants
2 Participants
2 Participants
Number of Par. With Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
Sodium H, n=156, 162, 151, 77
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Par. With Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
Sodium L, n=156, 162, 151, 77
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
Number of Par. With Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
BUN H, n=156, 162, 151, 77
7 Participants
5 Participants
12 Participants
5 Participants
Number of Par. With Clinical Chemistry Values of Potential Clinical Concern Any Time on Treatment
Total Bilirubin H, n=156, 162, 151, 77
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants

Adverse Events

Placebo

Serious events: 10 serious events
Other events: 13 other events
Deaths: 1 deaths

RSG XR 2 mg

Serious events: 7 serious events
Other events: 25 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

RSG XR 8 mg

Serious events: 8 serious events
Other events: 30 other events
Deaths: 1 deaths

Donepezil 10 mg

Serious events: 6 serious events
Other events: 11 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Placebo
n=165 participants at risk
Par. in this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=166 participants at risk
Par. in this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=165 participants at risk
Par. in this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=83 participants at risk
Par. in this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
0.61%
1/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.60%
1/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.60%
1/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hip fracture
0.61%
1/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.60%
1/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Accidental overdose
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.60%
1/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
0.61%
1/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
1.2%
1/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Cardiac disorders
Aortic valve stenosis
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
1.2%
1/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia supraventricular
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.61%
1/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
1.2%
1/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
1.2%
1/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.60%
1/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Humerus fracture
0.61%
1/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Subdural haematoma
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.60%
1/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
0.61%
1/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.60%
1/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral haemorrhage
0.61%
1/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
0.61%
1/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
1.2%
1/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Nervous system disorders
Tremor
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.60%
1/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Vascular disorders
Orthostatic hypotension
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.61%
1/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Vascular disorders
Phlebitis
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.61%
1/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Vascular disorders
Thrombophlebitis
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.61%
1/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.61%
1/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Iron deficiency anaemia
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.61%
1/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.60%
1/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal ulcer haemorrhage
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
1.2%
1/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
General disorders
Discomfort
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
1.2%
1/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
General disorders
Pain
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.60%
1/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.60%
1/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
0.61%
1/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
1.2%
1/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.61%
1/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.60%
1/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung neoplasm
0.61%
1/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Psychiatric disorders
Disorientation
0.61%
1/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.61%
1/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Aspiration
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.61%
1/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.00%
0/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Placebo
n=165 participants at risk
Par. in this arm received RSG placebo tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 2 mg
n=166 participants at risk
Par. in this arm received RSGXR 2 milligram (mg) tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for 24W. For par. in this arm, the dosage were remain constant throughout the 24W treatment period. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
RSG XR 8 mg
n=165 participants at risk
Par. in this arm received RSGXR 4 mg tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received 8 mg RSGXR tablet along with dummy donepezil capsule once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
Donepezil 10 mg
n=83 participants at risk
Par. in this arm received donepezil 5 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment. From Visit 4 (Week 4) onwards, these par. received donepezil 10 mg capsule along with dummy RSGXR tablet once daily for the remaining 20W of double-blind treatment. Study treatment were taken in the evening with or without food.
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
5.5%
9/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
3.6%
6/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
14.5%
24/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
3.6%
3/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
2.4%
4/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
6.6%
11/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
2.4%
4/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
1.2%
1/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperlipidaemia
0.61%
1/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
5.4%
9/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
0.61%
1/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
2.4%
2/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
0.00%
0/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
1.2%
2/166 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
1.2%
2/165 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.
8.4%
7/83 • Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were collected from the start of study medication up to W24.
The safety population (full population cohort) was used.

Additional Information

GSK Response Center

GlaxoSmithKline

Phone: 866-435-7343

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER