A Randomised, Controlled Comparison of Vitamin D Strategies is Acute Hip Fracture Patients
NCT ID: NCT00424619
Last Updated: 2025-07-16
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
64 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-10-31
2009-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of a Supplement Enriched in Hydroxymethylbutyrate and Vitamin D on Muscle Strength in Hip Fracture
NCT01850251
Early Rehabilitation After Hip Fracture
NCT00133640
Hip Fracture Surgery and Oral Nutritional Supplements
NCT01505985
Fixation Using Alternative Implants for the Treatment of Hip Fractures (FAITH-2)
NCT01908751
Identification of Microcirculation and Inflammation After Minimal-invasive Osteosynthesis of the Proximal Femur
NCT01264172
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25-OHD) concentrations are the recognized functional status indicator for vitamin D. Although there is no clear consensus, vitamin D 'insufficiency' has been considered in the range of 25- 75/80 nmol/L. Patients with acute hip fracture are at high risk for a recurrent hip fracture or other fragility fractures (and falls) and are a group who should be targeted for osteoporosis treatment (i.e. Bisphosphonate or other antiresorptive). Before fracture patients start on a bisphosphonate, however, an important consideration is whether 25-OHD levels are at a therapeutic level (\>75 nmol/l and less than 150-200 nmol/L). Case-control studies indicate that older people who experience a hip fracture have lower serum concentrations of 25-OHD than do those without a fracture. In cross-sectional studies, the majority of patients with hip fracture are considered to have insufficient vitamin D levels. Although the benefits of supplementing patients with at least 800 to 1000 IU/day Vitamin D3 may be recognized, there is little information available to guide physicians regarding the appropriate management of hip fracture patients who may be severely Vitamin D deficient, particularly in acute hip fracture patients. Few studies have examined whether high dose vitamin D (i.e. 50,000 IU or greater/week) offers an advantage over smaller, routinely prescribed doses (i.e. 800 or 1000 IU), particularly in hip fracture patients.
The purpose of this study is to determine the number of hip fracture patients reaching an optimal level of vitamin D comparing between three different Vitamin D dose strategies:
A. 50,000 D2 oral bolus followed by 800 IU D3 daily B. 100,000 D2 oral bolus followed by 800 IU D3 daily C. 800 IU D3 daily
The Vitamin D strategies will be administered over 3-months in acute hip fracture patients. The proportion of patients reaching an optimal level of 25-OHD (\>75 nmol/L) will be determined.
Secondary measures include the Timed Up and Go test, and 2 Minute Walk Test to compare the effects of the Vitamin D supplementation strategies on functional and muscle strength scales.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
50 000 IU Vitamin D2
Vitamin D2
50 000 IU vitamin D2, one time bolus dose
2
100 000 IU Vitamin D2
Vitamin D2
100 000 IU vitamin D2, one time bolus dose
3
Placebo
Placebo
Placebo, 1 time bolus dose
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vitamin D2
50 000 IU vitamin D2, one time bolus dose
Vitamin D2
100 000 IU vitamin D2, one time bolus dose
Placebo
Placebo, 1 time bolus dose
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Previous Vitamin D supplementation is okay.
Exclusion Criteria
* Cancer in the past 10 years likely to metastasize to bone
* Renal insufficiency (creatinine \<30 mls/min)
* Hypercalcemia (primary hyperparathyroidism; granulomatous diseases; drug-induced such as lithium, thiazides), hypocalcemia, hypercalciuria, fracture or stroke within the last 3 months
* Hormone replacement therapy, calcitonin, fluoride, or bisphosphonates during the previous 24 months
* Pre-existing bone abnormality
* Renal stones in past 10 years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Merck Frosst Canada Ltd.
INDUSTRY
McMaster University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Alexandra Papaioannou
Dr. Alexandra Papaioannou
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alexandra Papaioannou, M.D., M.Sc.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
McMaster University
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Papaioannou A, Kennedy CC, Giangregorio L, Ioannidis G, Pritchard J, Hanley DA, Farrauto L, DeBeer J, Adachi JD. A randomized controlled trial of vitamin D dosing strategies after acute hip fracture: no advantage of loading doses over daily supplementation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Jun 20;12:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-135.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P1975
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
06-449
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.