The Influence of Vibration on Bone Mineral Density in Women Who Have Weak Bones After Menopause
NCT ID: NCT00420940
Last Updated: 2010-04-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
202 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-11-30
2009-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Immediate Effect Of Whole-Body Vibration And Walk in Osteoporosis/Osteopenia
NCT03448276
Effects of Whole Body Vibration on Postmenopausal Risk-factors in Elderly Women
NCT00667667
Whole Body Vibration in Middle Aged Men
NCT06644469
Menopause Osteoporosis and Bone Intervention Using Lifestyle Exercise.
NCT04469374
"VIBES"--Low Magnitude Mechanical Stimulation to Improve Bone Mineral Density
NCT00396994
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Recent animal studies have shown that whole-body vibration increases bone mineral density. The effect of whole-body vibration on bone has been examined in only six small human studies with inconsistent results. Two of these studies have shown whole-body vibration reduces bone loss after menopause. Studies that used higher speed whole-body vibration may have produced greater reductions in bone loss.
OBJECTIVE AND HYPOTHESIS:
The objective of this study is to examine the effects of two whole-body vibration speeds trabecular BMD in the lower leg in osteopenic postmenopausal women. Two hundred postmenopausal women will take part in this 12-month study. Women will be randomly assigned into three groups (67 women per group) and these groups will be compared. Group 1 will receive very fast (90 Hz) whole-body vibration, Group 2 will receive fast (30 Hz) whole-body vibration, and Group 3 will not receive whole-body vibration. The hypothesis of this study is that the in comparison to Group 3 (no vibration), Groups 1 (very fast vibration, 90 Hz) and 2 (fast vibration, 30 Hz) will experience reduced bone loss over 12 months, and that the greatest reduction in bone loss will be experienced by Group 1.
METHODOLOGY:
Women with any clinical conditions that affect bone and those receiving drugs that affect bone will be excluded. The whole-body vibration therapy will involve standing barefoot and upright on a vibration platform daily for 20 minutes. Data will be collected at baseline, and at 12 months of follow-up. Our primary analysis will evaluate whether there are differences in changes in trabecular BMD in the lower leg (as measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography; pQCT) between Groups 1, 2, and 3. Our secondary analyses will examine whether there are differences in changes in the following bone characteristics between Groups 1, 2, and 3:
1. trabecular bone quality in the lower leg (as measured by pQCT)
2. cortical bone BMD and quality in the lower leg (as measured by pQCT)
3. trabecular and cortical bone BMD and quality in the wrist (as measured by pQCT)
4. BMD at the hip and spine (as measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry, DXA)
5. BMD and quality at the heel (as measured by quantitative ultrasound).
SIGNIFICANCE:
Based on current scientific understanding of bone remodeling, vibration devices have the potential to play a significant part in maintaining bone health in postmenopausal women. The results of this study will help us determine whether low-magnitude, high-frequency WBV at different vibration rates produces variable effects on bone, hence explaining the inconsistency of the results obtained previously. This study will also lay the ground work for future large-scale randomized controlled trials that are needed to investigate the long-term effects of WBV on preventing postmenopausal bone loss. If effective, WBV can be another non-pharmaceutical strategy to decrease bone loss in postmenopausal women. This in turn will decrease the number of osteoporotic fractures and their associated morbidity and mortality.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
90 Hz whole-body vibration
20-minute daily whole-body vibration at 90 Hz and 0.3g
Juvent 1000 Dynamic Motion Therapy (DMT) Platform
Standing on a DMT whole-body vibration platform for 20 minutes per day at a frequency of 90 Hz and acceleration due to gravity of 0.3g
30 Hz whole-body vibration
20-minute daily whole-body vibration at 90 Hz and 0.3g
Juvent 1000 Dynamic Motion Therapy (DMT) Platform
Standing on a DMT whole-body vibration platform for 20 minutes per day at a frequency of 90 Hz and acceleration due to gravity of 0.3g
control
control group (receiving no vibration)
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Juvent 1000 Dynamic Motion Therapy (DMT) Platform
Standing on a DMT whole-body vibration platform for 20 minutes per day at a frequency of 90 Hz and acceleration due to gravity of 0.3g
Juvent 1000 Dynamic Motion Therapy (DMT) Platform
Standing on a DMT whole-body vibration platform for 20 minutes per day at a frequency of 90 Hz and acceleration due to gravity of 0.3g
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* postmenopausal
Exclusion Criteria
* use of raloxifene or parathyroid hormone in the past 6 months
* use of bisphosphonates or fluoride in the past 3 months or ever taken for more than 3 months
* current use of calcitonin
* use of other medications that may indirectly affect bone metabolism
* presence of metabolic bone disease or diseases that indirectly affect bone metabolism
* occurrence of fragility fracture over 40 years of age
* presence of unhealed non-fragility fracture (i.e., occurring less then 6 months ago)
* having body mass ≤28 kg and ≥90 kg
* having knee or hip joint replacements and spine implants
* having poor balance (assessed by Timed-Up-and-Go)
* presence of other medical risks for the study
* inability to stand erect daily for 20 minutes
* planned vacation or other activities that would prevent one from using the platform for ≥1 month
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation
OTHER
University Health Network, Toronto
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
University Health Network/University of Toronto
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Angela M Cheung, M.D., Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Health Network, University of Toronto
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Slatkovska L, Alibhai SM, Beyene J, Hu H, Demaras A, Cheung AM. Effect of 12 months of whole-body vibration therapy on bone density and structure in postmenopausal women: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Nov 15;155(10):668-79, W205. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-10-201111150-00005.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PSI 06-28
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
06-0332-AE
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.