The Influence of Vibration on Bone Mineral Density in Women Who Have Weak Bones After Menopause

NCT ID: NCT00420940

Last Updated: 2010-04-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

202 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-11-30

Study Completion Date

2009-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will examine whether whole-body vibration slows down bone loss in healthy postmenopausal women with osteopenia. Whole-body vibration is a promising novel therapy that involves standing on a platform which produces extremely small and fast up-and-down movements. Some but not all research studies have found that whole-body vibration slowed down bone loss in postmenopausal women. One of the reasons why different studies found different results may be because they used various speeds of vibration. This study looks at how different speeds of whole-body vibration influence bone mineral density differently in postmenopausal women who have osteopenia. Two hundred postmenopausal women will take part in this 12-month study. Women will be randomly assigned into three groups (67 women per group) and these groups will be compared. Group 1 will receive very fast whole-body vibration, Group 2 will receive fast whole-body vibration, and Group 3 will not receive whole-body vibration. We will look at various bone mineral density and bone quality measurements, obtained with three different types of technologies, at the beginning of the study and at 12 months of follow-up. The hypothesis of this study is that the in comparison to Group 3 (no vibration), Groups 1 and 2 will experience reduced bone loss over 12 months, and that the greatest reduction in bone loss will be experienced by Group 1. The results of this study will help us determine whether whole-body vibration at different speeds produces variable effects on bone, hence explaining the inconsistency of the results obtained in previous studies.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BACKGROUND:

Recent animal studies have shown that whole-body vibration increases bone mineral density. The effect of whole-body vibration on bone has been examined in only six small human studies with inconsistent results. Two of these studies have shown whole-body vibration reduces bone loss after menopause. Studies that used higher speed whole-body vibration may have produced greater reductions in bone loss.

OBJECTIVE AND HYPOTHESIS:

The objective of this study is to examine the effects of two whole-body vibration speeds trabecular BMD in the lower leg in osteopenic postmenopausal women. Two hundred postmenopausal women will take part in this 12-month study. Women will be randomly assigned into three groups (67 women per group) and these groups will be compared. Group 1 will receive very fast (90 Hz) whole-body vibration, Group 2 will receive fast (30 Hz) whole-body vibration, and Group 3 will not receive whole-body vibration. The hypothesis of this study is that the in comparison to Group 3 (no vibration), Groups 1 (very fast vibration, 90 Hz) and 2 (fast vibration, 30 Hz) will experience reduced bone loss over 12 months, and that the greatest reduction in bone loss will be experienced by Group 1.

METHODOLOGY:

Women with any clinical conditions that affect bone and those receiving drugs that affect bone will be excluded. The whole-body vibration therapy will involve standing barefoot and upright on a vibration platform daily for 20 minutes. Data will be collected at baseline, and at 12 months of follow-up. Our primary analysis will evaluate whether there are differences in changes in trabecular BMD in the lower leg (as measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography; pQCT) between Groups 1, 2, and 3. Our secondary analyses will examine whether there are differences in changes in the following bone characteristics between Groups 1, 2, and 3:

1. trabecular bone quality in the lower leg (as measured by pQCT)
2. cortical bone BMD and quality in the lower leg (as measured by pQCT)
3. trabecular and cortical bone BMD and quality in the wrist (as measured by pQCT)
4. BMD at the hip and spine (as measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry, DXA)
5. BMD and quality at the heel (as measured by quantitative ultrasound).

SIGNIFICANCE:

Based on current scientific understanding of bone remodeling, vibration devices have the potential to play a significant part in maintaining bone health in postmenopausal women. The results of this study will help us determine whether low-magnitude, high-frequency WBV at different vibration rates produces variable effects on bone, hence explaining the inconsistency of the results obtained previously. This study will also lay the ground work for future large-scale randomized controlled trials that are needed to investigate the long-term effects of WBV on preventing postmenopausal bone loss. If effective, WBV can be another non-pharmaceutical strategy to decrease bone loss in postmenopausal women. This in turn will decrease the number of osteoporotic fractures and their associated morbidity and mortality.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bone Density Osteopenia Osteoporosis Post-Menopause

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

90 Hz whole-body vibration

20-minute daily whole-body vibration at 90 Hz and 0.3g

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Juvent 1000 Dynamic Motion Therapy (DMT) Platform

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standing on a DMT whole-body vibration platform for 20 minutes per day at a frequency of 90 Hz and acceleration due to gravity of 0.3g

30 Hz whole-body vibration

20-minute daily whole-body vibration at 90 Hz and 0.3g

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Juvent 1000 Dynamic Motion Therapy (DMT) Platform

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standing on a DMT whole-body vibration platform for 20 minutes per day at a frequency of 90 Hz and acceleration due to gravity of 0.3g

control

control group (receiving no vibration)

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Juvent 1000 Dynamic Motion Therapy (DMT) Platform

Standing on a DMT whole-body vibration platform for 20 minutes per day at a frequency of 90 Hz and acceleration due to gravity of 0.3g

Intervention Type DEVICE

Juvent 1000 Dynamic Motion Therapy (DMT) Platform

Standing on a DMT whole-body vibration platform for 20 minutes per day at a frequency of 90 Hz and acceleration due to gravity of 0.3g

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

low magnitude whole-body vibration platform low magnitude whole-body vibration platform

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* osteopenic
* postmenopausal

Exclusion Criteria

* use of HRT in the past 12 months
* use of raloxifene or parathyroid hormone in the past 6 months
* use of bisphosphonates or fluoride in the past 3 months or ever taken for more than 3 months
* current use of calcitonin
* use of other medications that may indirectly affect bone metabolism
* presence of metabolic bone disease or diseases that indirectly affect bone metabolism
* occurrence of fragility fracture over 40 years of age
* presence of unhealed non-fragility fracture (i.e., occurring less then 6 months ago)
* having body mass ≤28 kg and ≥90 kg
* having knee or hip joint replacements and spine implants
* having poor balance (assessed by Timed-Up-and-Go)
* presence of other medical risks for the study
* inability to stand erect daily for 20 minutes
* planned vacation or other activities that would prevent one from using the platform for ≥1 month
Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Health Network, Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

University Health Network/University of Toronto

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Angela M Cheung, M.D., Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Health Network, University of Toronto

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Health Network

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Slatkovska L, Alibhai SM, Beyene J, Hu H, Demaras A, Cheung AM. Effect of 12 months of whole-body vibration therapy on bone density and structure in postmenopausal women: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Nov 15;155(10):668-79, W205. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-10-201111150-00005.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22084333 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PSI 06-28

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

06-0332-AE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Effect of Electromyostimulation on Bone
NCT01296776 COMPLETED PHASE3