Aprotinin Use and Renal Outcome in Hypothermic Bypass and Circulatory Arrest for Surgical Repair of Thoracic Aorta.
NCT ID: NCT00405093
Last Updated: 2017-01-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
1250 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2006-07-31
2013-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Secondary Objective: To compare the effects of Aprotinin and Amicar on major vascular outcomes following thoracic aorta surgery with use of hypothermic bypass and circulatory arrest.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Albumin Utilization in Adult Cardiac Surgical Patients : A Multicentre Prospective Cohort Study
NCT06395480
Cardiac Surgery: In Vivo Titration of Protamine
NCT00684450
Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacodynamics of AP214 Acetate in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery
NCT00628264
Aprotinin US Special Access Protocol
NCT00611845
Pharmacokinetics of AP214 Acetate in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery
NCT00903604
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Complex surgery of the ascending thoracic aorta and the aortic arch requires use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with moderate or profound total body hypothermia and circulatory arrest. As expected, coagulation disorder can be common and severe requiring multiple transfusions of blood product, which, in turn, is associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Over the years, many techniques have been employed to ameliorate CPB- related bleeding with some agents such as aprotinin proving to be efficacious but centered in controversy either because of high cost or due to safety concerns.
Aprotinin is a serine protease inhibitor, intended to limit blood loss in patients undergoing surgery, was approved for use 13 years ago, and now administered in more than 250,000 surgery patients per year. Although its mechanism of action is not entirely known, it is shown to interfere with contact activation, preserve platelet function, inhibit fibrinolysis, and having some anti-inflammatory effects. Multiple studies have shown its superiority for reducing blood loss over other antifibrinolytics while other studies showing safety concerns regarding early graft closure causing myocardial infarction (following coronary bypass surgery), renal failure, vascular thrombosis, and death. Of note, several other studies have addressed such safety concerns- finding that the risk of the aforementioned vascular complications are comparable to results utilizing placebo or other antifibrinolytics such as aminocaproic acid. For example, the associated renal dysfunction was attributed to a competitive excretion process involving creatinine. That is, aprotinin competes with creatinine for elimination by the kidneys such that the apparent renal dysfunction is transient and a false marker of renal injury. However, the issue of renal injury has recently re-emerged as a serious problem in a multicenter study on patients undergoing coronary revascularization, whereby more than two fold increase in postoperative renal dysfunction as well as a nearly two fold rise in postoperative stroke was reported.
Much of the controversy and many of the conflicting results arise from either inadequate information (i.e., the definitive prospective study has not been done), from inadequately powered studies for the intended outcome, inclusion of multi-institution and multi-surgeon outcomes, or from studies involving patients with advanced ischemic heart disease whose ventricular function may have been compromised perioperatively. To overcome the mentioned limitations, and to better characterize to postoperative renal outcomes, we propose to investigate the safety of aprotinin in a single institution, single surgeon, and very large homogenous surgical cohort who underwent surgical repair of the ascending and aortic arch with use of hypothermic CPB.
Methods:
This will be a retrospective review of data collected between 1998 and present (nearly 900 patients) on adult patients having had ascending aorta and or aortic arch surgery at the NewYork Presbyterian Hospital. Data on demographics, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinical events will be extracted from the patient's electronic record and recorded on a database (Variables to be collected are presented in Appendix 1). A renal event will be comprised of renal dysfunction; defined by a serum creatinine level of at least 2.0 mg/dL (177 µmol/L), accompanied by an increase of at least 0.70 mg/dL (62 µmol/L) from baseline or renal failure; defined need for renal replacement therapy. Creatinine values and creatinine clearance will be recorded/calculated preoperatively and postoperatively until hospital discharge.
Statistical Analysis Include analysis for association between potential preoperative, intraoperative, and early postoperative variables with postoperative renal dysfunction by univariate analysis (student's t test and Fisher's exact test). The variables identified by univariate testing (p\< 0.15) will be entered into a multivariate logistic regression. Significance will be set a P \< 0.05 and odds ratio will be calculated where applicable.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Use of Antifibrinolytic agents (Aprotinin and Aminocaproic Acid)
Exclusion Criteria
2. Pre-Existing Renal Failure or Renal dysfunction (creatinine \>2.0 mg/dl)
3. Moderate or Severe Ventricular Dysfunction
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
James Osorio, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The New York Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Medical College of Cornell University
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0607008636
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.