PEPCAD I. The Paclitaxel-Eluting PTCA-Balloon Catheter to Treat Small Vessel
NCT ID: NCT00404144
Last Updated: 2015-03-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-01-31
2012-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
P E P C A D II, The Paclitaxel-Eluting PTCA-Balloon Catheter in Coronary Artery Disease to Treat In-Stent Restenoses
NCT00393315
The Paclitaxel-Eluting Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) - Balloon Catheter in Coronary Artery Disease to Treat Chronic Total Occlusions
NCT00670436
PEPCAD III Substudy: Stem Cell Mobilization
NCT00473499
Treatment of Drug-eluting Stent (DES) In-Stent Restenosis With SeQuent® Please Paclitaxel Eluting Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) Catheter
NCT00998439
Treatment of Coronary De-novo Stenosis by a Sirolimus Coated Balloon or a Paclitaxel Coated Balloon Catheter Malaysia
NCT04017364
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Stent deployment for the treatment of coronary artery stenoses has evolved as the standard treatment in nearly all types of coronary lesions over the past two decades. The initial recurrence rate of bare stents in the range of 20 30 % in low risk stenoses has been further reduced by devices with passive coatings such as silicon carbide, heparin, phosphorylcholine, and carbon.
In the percutaneous transluminal treatment of stenotic coronary arteries with diameters below 3 mm, however, none of the currently available methods, namely balloon angioplasty with conventional balloons (POBA) and deployment of non-drug eluting stents have shown acceptable results for the various reasons inherent to these approaches. Although some studies showed POBA and the deployment of bare stents to be equally effective with respect to restenosis, in a recently published meta-analysis of eleven trials the restenosis rates were as high as 25.8 % for POBA and 34.2 % for bare stents, respectively.
Brachytherapy initially demonstrated encouraging results. However, due to its disadvantages such as delayed endothelialization, the risk associated with additional stenting, the cumbersome logistics at the sites and in the labs, brachytherapy is not considered as a valid approach. Data with the Sirolimus-eluting Cypher™ stent in vessels averaging 2.60 ± 0.54 mm in diameter showed the benefit of this cytostatic drug in this indication. However, this approach introduces a layer of metal to the per se small vessel and, thus, reduces the vascular lumen.
Study Rationale:
Since none of the above mentioned options for the percutaneous treatment of small vessel coronary artery stenoses seems to be universally recommendable the Paclitaxel-eluting PTCA balloon catheter has to be considered as an alternative. The possible advantages over either the uncoated balloon or bare stent include the antiproliferative mode of action of the compound. In comparison to the drug eluting stents (DES) the homogenous distribution of the compound along the target vessel segment, the lack of chronic mechanical alteration of the artery and the ease of access to the lesion would favor the Paclitaxel-eluting balloon.
However, there are no data available on the use of the drug eluting balloons in small vessel disease and the information on the other indication evaluated to date, the treatment of in-stent restenosis is limited. In the latter indication, the animal model and according to unpublished results in humans, the proliferation induced by a Paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheter was significantly less compared to an uncoated balloon, the Paclitaxel-coated Taxus™ stent, and to the Sirolimus-eluting Cypher™ stent. Therefore, it is prudent to test the Paclitaxel-eluting PTCA balloon catheter as an alternative approach for the percutaneous transluminal treatment of small vessel coronary artery lesions.
Since none of the alternative methods has unequivocally shown its superiority over the other, none of them may serve as the golden standard and, i.e., for direct comparison. Consequently, as the initial step conducting a single arm study with the Paclitaxel-eluting balloon is suggested with historic data serving for comparison. Once these results will have been obtained a prospective randomized trial shall be discussed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Drug Eluting Balloon
treatment of small vessel with drug eluting balloon
Drug Eluting Balloon
PCI of small vessels single arm study
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Drug Eluting Balloon
PCI of small vessels single arm study
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients eligible for coronary revascularization by means of PCI
* Patients suitable for coronary revascularization of any sort (balloon angioplasty, device-assisted balloon-angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting)
* Women of childbearing potential may not be pregnant nor have the desire to becoming pregnant during the first year following the study procedure. Hence, patients will be advised to use an adequate birth control method up to and including 6 months follow-up.
* Patients who are mentally and linguistically able to understand the aim of the study and to show sufficient compliance in following the study protocol
* Patients must agree to undergo the 6 months angiographic follow-up
* Patients must agree to undergo the 1 and 3 year clinical follow-up
* Patient is able to verbally acknowledge an understanding of the associated risks, benefits, and treatment alternatives to therapeutic options of this trial, e.g., balloon angioplasty by means of the Paclitaxel-eluting PTCA-balloon catheter. The patients, by providing their informed consent, agree to these risks and benefits as stated in the patient informed consent document
* Patients with medical indication for follow-up angiography
* Reference diameters from 2.25 mm to 2.8 mm and ≤ 22 mm in length
* Diameter stenosis pre procedure must be either \> 70 % or \>50 % if ischemia corresponding to the target lesion is documented either by exercise stress ECG, stress echocardiography, or scintigraphy
* The target lesion must be covered by a single Paclitaxel-eluting balloon
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with unstable angina pectoris (Braunwald class 3)
* Patients with severe congestive heart failure
* Patients with severe heart failure NYHA IV
* Patients demonstrating clinical signs of cardiogenic shock at the time of the procedure (systolic blood pressure of less than 80 mm Hg requiring inotropic support, IABP and/or fluid challenge).
* Women who are pregnant or lactating
* Patients with another coronary stent implanted previously into the target vessel
* Patients with bleeding diathesis in whom anticoagulation or anti-platelet medication is contraindicated
* Patient participates in other clinical trials involving any investigational device or drug
* Untreated hyperthyroidism
* Patient has presence or history of severe renal failure (GFR\<30ml/min) and is therefore not eligible for angiography. Patient's serum creatinine levels must be documented
* Post transplantation of any organ or immune suppressive medication
* Other disease to jeopardize follow-up (e.g., malignoma)
* Addiction to any drug or to alcohol
* Patients with any type of surgery during the week preceding the interventional procedure
* Evidence of extensive thrombosis within target vessel before the intervention
* Side branch \> 2 mm in diameter originating from the lesion
* Bifurcate lesion
* Restenotic lesion
* Multilesion percutaneous coronary intervention within the same artery (a main artery (e.g., LCdx) and its side branch (e.g., OMS) are considered as different arteries)
* Percutaneous coronary intervention of venous graft
* Target segment is occluded (i.e., acute or chronic)
* In-stent restenosis
* Ostial lesion within 2 mm of vessel origin
* Patient is intolerant to aspirin and/or the ADP-antagonists clopidogrel or has a history of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia induced by ADP-antagonists, or severe hepatic dysfunction prohibiting the use of clopidogrel
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
B. Braun Melsungen AG
INDUSTRY
Clinical Research Institute, Center for Cardiovascular Disease Rotenburg a.d.F.
UNKNOWN
Heart Centre Rotenburg
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ralf Degenhardt, PhD
Data Manager
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
M. Unverdorben, MD,PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Heinz-Meise-Strasse 100, D-36199 Rotenburg a.d. Fulda, Germany
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kerckhoff-Clinic Bad Nauheim
Bad Nauheim, , Germany
Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin
Berlin, , Germany
Medizinische Klinik, Kardiologie, St.-Johannes -Hospital
Dortmund, , Germany
Städtische Kliniken Esslingen, Klinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie und Pneumologie
Esslingen am Neckar, , Germany
Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin III
Halle, , Germany
University of Heidelberg, Clinic for Internal Medicine, Dept. of Cardiology
Heidelberg, , Germany
University of Saarland, Internal Medicine III
Homburg/Saar, , Germany
Universitätklinikum Jena, Klinik für Innere Medizin
Jena, , Germany
Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Cardiologic Clinic
Rotenburg A.d. Fulda, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Unverdorben M, Kleber FX, Heuer H, Figulla HR, Vallbracht C, Leschke M, Cremers B, Hardt S, Buerke M, Ackermann H, Boxberger M, Degenhardt R, Scheller B. Treatment of small coronary arteries with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter in the PEPCAD I study: are lesions clinically stable from 12 to 36 months? EuroIntervention. 2013 Sep;9(5):620-8. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I5A99.
Unverdorben M, Kleber FX, Heuer H, Figulla HR, Vallbracht C, Leschke M, Cremers B, Hardt S, Buerke M, Ackermann H, Boxberger M, Degenhardt R, Scheller B. Treatment of small coronary arteries with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter. Clin Res Cardiol. 2010 Mar;99(3):165-74. doi: 10.1007/s00392-009-0101-6. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PEPCAD II/CRI/05/-01/c-c
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
ID: BBM-VS-52
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.