Randomized Trial of Immediate Versus Early and Selective Invasive Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in NSTEMI

NCT ID: NCT00402675

Last Updated: 2010-01-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

600 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-07-31

Study Completion Date

2010-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In non-ST-elevation the optimal time of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unclear.

Some studies showed benefit of very early PCI, some others early PCI between 12-48 hours and others even showed a benefit of a selective invasive approach only in case of recurrence of symptoms or a positive stress test.

The optimal timing of intervention is still matter of debate as a result of a randomized clinical trial.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this randomized, controlled, open-label clinical trial we compare a very early cardiac catheterization (\< 2,5 hours after randomization) similar to ST-elevation myocardial infarction treatment, versus an early invasive approach (within 2-48 hours after randomization) versus a selective invasive approach in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

All patients are treated with heparin, ASA, Clopidogrel loading dose (600 mg) with subsequent 75 mg/d and tirofiban for 24 hours.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Myocardial Infarction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Immediate Intervention

Patients with NSTEMI undergo immediate invasive angiography (\< 2 hours)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Timing of percutaneous coronary intervention

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Immediate, early or selective invasive angiography

Early Intervention

Patients with NSTEMI undergo early invasive angiography (12-48 hours)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Timing of percutaneous coronary intervention

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Immediate, early or selective invasive angiography

Selective invasive angiography

Patients with NSTEMI undergo selective invasive angiography

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Timing of percutaneous coronary intervention

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Immediate, early or selective invasive angiography

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Timing of percutaneous coronary intervention

Immediate, early or selective invasive angiography

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Clinical symptoms:

Instable angina pectoris:
* Angina at rest \< 24 hours
* new onset worsening angina within the last weeks with angina at very low threshold \< 24 h
2. Troponin T:

Troponin T-elevation ≥ 0,03 μg/l
3. Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Age \< 18 years
2. Age \> 90 years
3. STEMI
4. Hemodynamic instability
5. Cardiogenic shock
6. Warfarin therapy
7. Contraindications for GpIIb/IIIa-inhibitors
8. life expectancy \< 6 months
9. known high bleeding risk
10. Pregnancy
11. Other reasons for Troponin-elevation: Myocarditis, secondary after hypertensive crisis, cardiac decompensation
12. No informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

89 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Leipzig

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

University of Leipzig - Heart Center

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Holger Thiele

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Heart Center Leipzig - University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Klinikum Links der Weser

Bremen, , Germany

Site Status

Städt. Klinikum St. Georg

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

University of Leipzig - Heart Center

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

University of Leipzig

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder

Regensburg, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Thiele H, Rach J, Klein N, Pfeiffer D, Hartmann A, Hambrecht R, Sick P, Eitel I, Desch S, Schuler G; LIPSIA-NSTEMI Trial Group. Optimal timing of invasive angiography in stable non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the Leipzig Immediate versus early and late PercutaneouS coronary Intervention triAl in NSTEMI (LIPSIA-NSTEMI Trial). Eur Heart J. 2012 Aug;33(16):2035-43. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr418. Epub 2011 Nov 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22108830 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Leipzig-4

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.