A Study of the Effects of Minocycline on Cognitive Function After Carotid Endarterectomy
NCT ID: NCT00401921
Last Updated: 2017-07-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
PHASE2
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-10-31
2010-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
(1) The first aim of this study is to examine whether 5 doses of minocycline administered 36 hrs before and 1 dose 12 hrs after the surgical procedure in patients undergoing CEA are effective to reduce the cognitive deficits associated with this procedure as compared with placebo.
a. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in cognitive performance changes after CEA between the patients that receive placebo or minocycline.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Safety of High Dose Minocycline in the Patient Population Undergoing Carotid Revascularization
NCT02178813
Study of microRNAs in the Evolution of Carotid Plaque. Physiopathological and Therapeutic Interest
NCT03149406
A Study of Evolocumab on Carotid Artery Atherosclerotic Plaque Morphology Prior to Carotid EndArterectomy
NCT04539223
Revacept in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis
NCT01645306
TRACER RGD-K5 Carotid Plaque Imaging Study
NCT01968226
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The principal aim of this investigation is to study the effects of minocycline on cognitive performance after carotid endarterectomy. To measure cognitive function, we will perform a neuropsychological battery of tests (as detailed below). This battery of tests will be carried out by a blinded rater (a neurologist) and will be performed according to the following timetable:
Training session: before the baseline, patients will perform the tasks several times until they reach a stable plateau (defined as a variation of less than 10% in the last three trials) in order to eliminate the confounding effect of learning.
Baseline evaluation: the baseline evaluation will be performed in the day prior to the surgery.
Post-treatment evaluation: post-treatment evaluation will be performed 24 hours after the surgical procedure by the same blinded rater.
Neuropsychological battery of tests: we based our neuropsychological battery of tests on a similar study that evaluated the cognitive deficits associated with CEA and will consist of the following tests:
1. Trail making test - parts A and B (this test evaluates visual concept and visuo-motor track)
2. Controlled Oral Word Association (letters C, F and L) (this test evaluates verbal fluency)
3. The Boston Naming Test (naming of 60 pictures) (this test evaluates left hemisphere damage)
4. Digit Span Forward and Backward (this test evaluates working memory)
5. Stroop Task (this test evaluates selective attention and mental flexibility)
6. Mini-mental state examination (this test evaluates an adult patient's level of global cognitive functioning)
Blood sample analysis: As a secondary outcome, we will analyze subjects blood sample in respect to two particular substances: S100B and neuron specific enolase. The rationale for performing proteomic studies is that past research has shown that subtle cerebral injuries after carotid endarterectomy, even in the absence of stroke, might be associated with a significant increase in serum S100B (Connolly, 2001 - Neurosurgery, 2001 49 (5)) and also in traumatic brain injury (Cotena, 2006, J Neurosurg 2006 104 (6)). In addition, neuron specific enolase (NSE) also seems to be valuable to predict brain damage in patients with brain traumatic injury (Naeimi, 2006 - Brain Inj 2006 20(5)), thus showing that these two substances might be important biomarkers to be investigated in our study.
After eligibility screening (inclusion and exclusion criteria), consent form, medical history and physical exam participants will be randomized to the exposure - minocycline or placebo. The pills (minocycline and placebo) will have the same appearance and only one person will know whether the treatment is active or placebo.
Randomization:
Because our sample size will be relatively small, participants will be randomized to minocycline or placebo through a randomization stratification approach. This approach will ensure that both groups will have a similar distribution regarding baseline performance in the cognitive tests. Participants will be gathered into groups (strata) defined by their performance in the neuropsychological tasks (baseline). Participants within each stratum will be randomized to one of two treatment groups - minocycline and placebo - according to a block randomization of four and using a randomization list generated by a computer that will take into account the study entrance order. These groups are defined as follows:
Minocycline: we will use the dosage of minocycline that is currently used for clinical indications and also used in trials employing this drug as an anti-inflammatory agent. Minocycline will be administered in the period of 36 hrs before surgery (100 mg twice a day and 200 mg in the morning of the surgery - total of 5 doses) and 12 hrs after surgery (single dose of 100 mg).
The two doses of minocycline administered in the morning of the surgery will be taken with a small sip of water.
Placebo: placebo pill will have the same appearance as the real drug (minocycline) and will be administered using the same timetable as the active drug.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Minocycline arm
Minocycline 100mg/Placebo 0mg Minocycline 100mg, 1 capsule PO BID starting 36 hours prior to surgery. 2 capsules the morning of surgery
Minocycline
100 mg, 1 capsule PO BID starting 36 hours prior to surgery. 2 capsules the morning of surgery
Placebo arm
Placebo 0mg, 1 capsule PO BID starting 36 hours prior to surgery. 2 capsules the morning of surgery.
Placebo oral capsule
1 capsule PO BID starting 36 hours prior to surgery. 2 capsules the morning of surgery.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Minocycline
100 mg, 1 capsule PO BID starting 36 hours prior to surgery. 2 capsules the morning of surgery
Placebo oral capsule
1 capsule PO BID starting 36 hours prior to surgery. 2 capsules the morning of surgery.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients that can perform the tests in English.
3. Women of childbearing age must be non-lactating and surgically sterile or using an effective method of birth control and have a negative pregnancy test (adequate birth control includes use of intra uterine device, or a barrier method, e.g. condom, diaphragm).
4. Ages Eligible for Study: 18 Years - 90 Years
5. Genders Eligible for Study: Both
Exclusion Criteria
2. Advanced cardiac, pulmonary or renal disease as assessed by the PCP of the patient.
3. Previous strokes with important clinical neurological deficits.
4. Pregnancy, breast-feeding or lactating
5. Baseline MMSE score less or equal to 20.
6. Female subjects on oral contraceptives.
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Joanne O'Hara
Sr. Project Manager
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Robert Friedlander, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2006-P-001225
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.