MAPS Trial: Matrix And Platinum Science

NCT ID: NCT00396981

Last Updated: 2016-02-17

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

626 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-03-31

Study Completion Date

2015-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Primary Objectives:

* To establish Target Aneurysm Recurrence (TAR) rates for Matrix 2® and GDC® Coils used for the treatment of intracranial saccular aneurysms. TAR is defined as clinically relevant recurrence resulting in: target aneurysm reintervention, rupture/re-rupture and/or death from an unknown cause.
* To correlate defined angiographic endpoints with TAR rates and assess their predictive value, thereby providing a framework to establish clinically relevant endpoints for future studies.

Secondary Objectives:

* To evaluate device characteristics, incidence and severity of device-related adverse events, including death, neurological deterioration and changes in functional abilities.
* To establish angiographic recurrence rates for Matrix 2® and GDC® Coils used for the treatment of intracranial saccular aneurysms.
* To explore an experimental, quantitative and volumetric endpoint and correlate these with existing qualitative assessments.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms has become an accepted alternative to surgical repair given the many recent advances with neurointerventional devices and procedures. The introduction of GDC coils in 1993 provided physicians and their patients a less invasive treatment option. Additionally, the results of two large international trials, ISAT and ISUIA, have shown the benefits of endovascular treatment over surgery for treatment of specific types of aneurysms. One limitation of endovascular coil embolization is aneurysm recurrence or recanalization which is not infrequently observed angiographically at follow up. Aneurysm recanalization may be a result of aneurysm morphology, anatomic location and flow orientation, aneurysm regrowth or the degree of coil compaction. Despite the widespread adoption of endovascular aneurysm coiling, there remains much to be learned about the efficacy and optimization of this treatment modality.

The goal of endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms is to prevent rupture or re-rupture. Fortunately, the incidence of aneurysm rupture following coil embolization is very low. Follow-up angiographic analysis to evaluate the occlusion and stability of the treated aneurysm provides a surrogate endpoint against which to weigh the likelihood of rupture/re-rupture. However, angiographic interpretation is subjective, operator dependent and can be influenced by multiple confounding variables.

The MAPS trial will examine Target Aneurysm Recurrence Rates: clinically relevant recurrence rates resulting in target aneurysm reintervention, rupture/re-rupture and/or death from an unknown cause for Matrix 2® and GDC® Coils used for the treatment of intracranial saccular aneurysms. The trial will compare TAR rates to recurrences measured by angiographic analysis and assess the utility of angiographic analysis for predicting clinically relevant recurrences.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intracranial Aneurysms

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Matrix 2® Coils

Matrix 2® Coils for endovascular aneurysm occlusion

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Matrix 2® coils for endovascular aneurysm occlusion

Intervention Type DEVICE

endovascular aneurysm occlusion coil

GDC® Coils

GDC® Coils for endovascular aneurysm occlusion

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

GDC® coils for endovascular aneurysm occlusion

Intervention Type DEVICE

endovascular aneurysm occlusion coil

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Matrix 2® coils for endovascular aneurysm occlusion

endovascular aneurysm occlusion coil

Intervention Type DEVICE

GDC® coils for endovascular aneurysm occlusion

endovascular aneurysm occlusion coil

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient is between 18 and 80 years of age (inclusive).
2. Patient has a documented untreated intracranial saccular aneurysm 4-20 mm diameter angiographic lumen, ruptured or unruptured, suitable for embolization with coils.
3. Both GDC® Coils and Matrix 2® Coils (Every attempt should be made to treat with as much randomized coil type as possible to achieve optimal occlusion.) are treatment options (all shapes allowed with exception of GDC VortX Coil).
4. Target aneurysm can be adequately coiled at index procedure (NO staged coiling procedures). If a Neuroform stent is to be placed during a separate preliminary procedure, then screening and enrollment for the coiling procedure must take place after the stenting procedure is completed.
5. Target aneurysm morphology allows for adequate retention of coils within the aneurysmal sac without occlusion of the parent artery, as determined by the treating physician.
6. Patient (or patient's legally authorized representative for centers in the United States) has provided written informed consent.
7. Patient is willing and able to comply with protocol follow-up requirements.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient is \< 18 or \> 80 years old.
2. Target aneurysm is not saccular in nature (mycotic, fusiform, dissecting).
3. Target aneurysm is \> 20 mm maximum luminal dimension, \< 4 mm maximum luminal dimension.
4. Target aneurysm has been previously treated by surgery or endovascular therapy.
5. Target aneurysm is in the physician's estimation unlikely to be successfully treated by endovascular techniques.
6. Patient presents as Hunt and Hess grade IV or V for a ruptured aneurysm.
7. Patient presents with Modified Rankin Score 4 or 5 at baseline.
8. Patient is concurrently enrolled in another investigational drug or device study unless permission is granted by the sponsor.
9. Patient has known hypersensitivity to Polyglycolic Polylactic Acid (PGLA), platinum, nickel, stainless steel or structurally related compounds found in Matrix 2® Coils and/or GDC® Coils.
10. Patients who have had or could have a severe reaction to contrast agents that cannot be adequately pre-medicated prior to the coiling procedure.
11. Patients who are unable to complete scheduled follow up assessments at the enrolling center due to limited life expectancy (\< 12 months), comorbidities or geographical considerations.
12. Planned use of adjunctive therapy stents except Neuroform is not allowed.
13. Patients with Moya-Moya disease, AVMs, AV fistula, intracranial tumors, intracranial hematoma (unrelated to target aneurysm), significant atherosclerotic stenosis, tortuousity or other conditions preventing access to the target aneurysm.
14. Patients with multiple aneurysms.
15. Target aneurysm with significant thrombosis that may increase the likelihood of recanalization at the discretion of the investigator.
16. Female patient has a positive pregnancy assessment at baseline.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Stryker Neurovascular

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

S. Claiborne Johnston, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, San Francisco, CA

Cameron McDougall, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ

Anil Gholkar, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals, NHS Trust, UK

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St. Joseph's Hospital Barrow Neurological Institute

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson Medical Center

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Yale-New Haven Hospital

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Rush Presbyterian

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

The Universtiy of Iowa

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

University of Maryland

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University of Massachusetts Worcester

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Providence Detroit

Southfield, Michigan, United States

Site Status

St. Joseph's Hospital

Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Barnes Jewish Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

University of New Mexico Department of Neurosurgery

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Stony Brook Medical Center

Stony Brook, New York, United States

Site Status

Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, PA

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Mercy Health Center

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

OHSU

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Methodist Hospital

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Washington Harborview Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Sacred Heart Providence

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

University of Wisconsin Hospital and Center

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Royal Melbourne Hospital

Parkville, , Australia

Site Status

Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Xuan Wu Hospital

Beijing, , China

Site Status

CHU Montpelier

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Klinikum Augsburg

Augsburg, , Germany

Site Status

Universitaetsklinikum Freiburg

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

Asklepios Klinik Altona

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Universitaetsklinikum des Saarlandes

Homburg/Saar, , Germany

Site Status

Instituto Nacional de Neurologia e Neurocirurgia

Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Rikshospitalet University Hospital

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Hospital General

Alicante, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clinico Y provincial

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Donostia

Donostia / San Sebastian, , Spain

Site Status

Clinica Ntra Sra Del Rosario Hospital Ruber Internacional

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Istanbul University Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi

Kocamustafapaşa, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

The Walton Centre

Fazakerley, Liverpool, United Kingdom

Site Status

Newcastle General Hospital Department of Neuroradiology

Tyne and Wear, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Canada China France Germany Mexico Norway Spain Turkey (Türkiye) United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

McDougall CG, Johnston SC, Gholkar A, Barnwell SL, Vazquez Suarez JC, Masso Romero J, Chaloupka JC, Bonafe A, Wakhloo AK, Tampieri D, Dowd CF, Fox AJ, Imm SJ, Carroll K, Turk AS; MAPS Investigators. Bioactive versus bare platinum coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: the MAPS (Matrix and Platinum Science) trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 May;35(5):935-42. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3857. Epub 2014 Jan 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24481333 (View on PubMed)

Hetts SW, Turk A, English JD, Dowd CF, Mocco J, Prestigiacomo C, Nesbit G, Ge SG, Jin JN, Carroll K, Murayama Y, Gholkar A, Barnwell S, Lopes D, Johnston SC, McDougall C; Matrix and Platinum Science Trial Investigators. Stent-assisted coiling versus coiling alone in unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the matrix and platinum science trial: safety, efficacy, and mid-term outcomes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Apr;35(4):698-705. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3755. Epub 2013 Nov 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24184523 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BSC0015

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

T4902

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

French eCLIPs™ Efficacy and Safety Investigation
NCT05330897 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
INSPIRE Pipeline™ Shield Post Approval Study
NCT05071963 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING