Safety of Two Epidural Catheters in Thoracic Epidural Anaesthesia (TEA)
NCT ID: NCT00394459
Last Updated: 2011-05-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
140 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-04-30
2009-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Primary Endpoint: Incidence of spontaneous paraesthesia during catheter insertion
Secondary Objectives: The secondary objectives are to determine the safety and performance of the investigational product: frequency of inadvertent vascular cannulation, difficulties involved in insertion and removal of the catheter, other safety features and data for the evaluation of handling characteristics.
Title: Randomised, prospective, single-blind, controlled, study on the safety of two epidural catheters in patients undergoing surgery under thoracic epidural anaesthesia
Investigational Product: Perifix Epidural Anaesthesia Catheter
Test Product: Perifix New
Reference Product: Perifix Standard
Number of Sites and Countries: 1 site in The Netherlands
Indication: Thoracic epidural anaesthesia
Study Design: Randomised, prospective, single-blind, controlled study in 1 study center, phase IV
Perifix New and Perifix Standard meet all the appropriate provisions of the relevant legislation implementing European Directives (both have CE-marking).
Study Duration: 2 year duration
Study Start: March-April 2005
Sample Size: n = 2\*70 patients
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Performance Over Dwell Time and Safety of the Central-venous Catheters Certofix® Paed
NCT05124821
Fixation of Thoracic Epidurals Influencing Catheter-related Infections and Dislocation
NCT01402778
Midlines and Thrombophlebitis
NCT03725293
Efficacy and Safety in Pacemaker and Defibrillator Implantation Via Cephalic Versus Axillary Vein Access (CEPHAX)
NCT03860090
Survey of Practices Regarding the Use of Taurolidine Lock Solutions in Patients With Insertion of a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) in a Vascular Access Unit
NCT07259421
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Although epidural anaesthesia is a safe technique, during the insertion of epidural catheters several side effects may occur, including transient paraesthesia and inadvertent vascular cannulation.
Reported incidences for paraesthesia vary widely between about 0.2% and 50% in different articles, depending on the catheter (catheter material, soft-tipped or firm-tipped catheter), the applied technique (lumbar or thoracic epidural anaesthesia, depth of catheter insertion), the approach (midline or paramedian) and the included patients (obstetrical or non-obstetrical). Paraesthesias are not supposed to lead to permanent neurological sequelae, but are unpleasant and perturbing sensations for the patient.
Besides inadvertent intrathecal location of the catheter, further problems include technical difficulties during threading or removal of the catheter. Here, the catheter shaft material seems to be the crucial factor for the incidence of problems.
Based upon years of experience, a wide range of epidural catheters were created, among them the Perifix catheter of B. Braun. Common features are their high tensile strength and stretch resistance, excellent shaft stability with easy visualisation of blood or spinal fluid due to the crystal clear material, no risk of forming loops or knots, and softening of catheter within a few hours due to water absorption of the polyamide material.
Recently, B. Braun Melsungen AG has developed a new generation of Perifix epidural catheters, which are already CE-labeled. These new catheters are different in their composition compared to the current Perifix Standard catheter with regard to the catheter material and tip configuration. They have an outer poly-urethane liner and an inner polyamide body. Experimental tests have shown that the positive features (e.g. pushability, kink resistance, gliding, withdrawal) of the Perifix Standard catheter can be maintained. Due to the polyurethane outer layer, the catheter gets softer when reaching body temperature immediately upon insertion. Based on this, it is expected that paraesthesias during catheter injection can be reduced by at least 20%.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A
Perifix Standard
Perifix Epidural Anaesthesia Catheter
Epidural Catheter
Perifix Standard
Perifix Standard
B
Perifix New
Perifix Epidural Anaesthesia Catheter
Epidural Catheter
Perifix New
Perifix New
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Perifix Epidural Anaesthesia Catheter
Epidural Catheter
Perifix Standard
Perifix Standard
Perifix New
Perifix New
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I-III
* Patients aged 18 and ≤ 75 years of age
Exclusion Criteria
* Non-competent and non-cooperative patients
* Patients with medicament and drug abuse problems, problems in communication, participating in parallel in another clinical study with experimental drugs or devices, receiving prohibited concomitant therapies
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
B. Braun Melsungen AG
INDUSTRY
Maastricht University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
MaastrichtUMC
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mathieu Gielen, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Radboud University Medical Center
Marco Marcus, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Maastricht University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Maastricht
Maastricht, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H-04-078-04
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
MEC 04-1-83
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.