Does the Order in Which Vaccines Are Administered Affect Pain Response?

NCT ID: NCT00390130

Last Updated: 2013-11-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-07-31

Study Completion Date

2008-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this study is to determine whether there should be a predetermined sequence recommended for administering these two vaccines, with the less painful vaccine being given first.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Childhood vaccination is one of the most effective public health measures worldwide, with few serious adverse effects reported. However, pain on vaccination continues to be a frequent occurrence and is the most common cause of childhood iatrogenic pain. In a recent study of paediatricians in the USA, more than ninety percent reported at least one parental vaccine refusal in the past year. The most common concerns cited by parents were short-term reactions and pain from multiple injections.

One of the factors responsible for vaccination pain is the vaccine material itself. Even the same vaccine, when made by different pharmaceutical companies may produce different pain responses. Anecdotal reports from doctors and nurses indicate that Pentacel (DPTaP+Hib) is a relatively painless vaccine to administer whereas Prevnar (conjugated pneumococcal vaccine) causes significant pain on injection and severe distress to the infant being vaccinated. For this reason, many vaccinators administer Pentacel \[DPT\] prior to Prevnar \[PCV\] when providing both vaccines in one visit. However, the difference in infant pain responses has not been documented. Although it has been shown that very early pain events affect infants' later experience of pain, it has not been demonstrated that the sequence in which vaccines are administered affects pain response. This study will assess whether there should be a predetermined sequence recommended for administering these two vaccines, with the less painful vaccine (Pentacel) being given first.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Vaccination Pediatrics Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pentacel

The subjects in this arm will be vaccinated with Pentacel

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pentacel (DPTaP+Hib)

Intervention Type DRUG

Prevnar

The subjects in this arm will be vaccinated with Prevnar

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Prevnar (conjugated pneumococcal vaccine)

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pentacel (DPTaP+Hib)

Intervention Type DRUG

Prevnar (conjugated pneumococcal vaccine)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy infant
* 2 - 6 months of age
* receiving primary DPT and PCV vaccinations

Exclusion Criteria

* chronic illness
* immune deficiency
* immunosuppression
* a history of allergy to DPT or PCV or any of its components
* fever
* any acute illness that prevents the administration of the vaccine
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

6 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Hospital for Sick Children

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Moshe Ipp

Staff Physician

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Moshe Ipp, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto Canada

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Hospital for Sick Children

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ipp M, Parkin PC, Lear N, Goldbach M, Taddio A. Order of vaccine injection and infant pain response. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 May;163(5):469-72. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.35.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 19414694 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1000009089

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id