A Study Comparing Two Different PROCRIT Doses to a Dose of ARANESP in Anemic Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy

NCT ID: NCT00386152

Last Updated: 2013-07-19

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

235 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-11-30

Study Completion Date

2008-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare hemoglobin response rates between two PROCRIT (epoetin alfa) doses and ARANESP (darbepoetin alfa) in anemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is an open-label (both the physician and the patient know which treatment is being provided), multi-center study of up to 16 weeks duration in which 450 patients will be randomly assigned (patients are assigned to a specific study group by chance) to one of three treatment groups in a 1:1:1 ratio. Patients will receive PROCRIT (epoetin alfa) 80,000 Units injected subcutaneously (under the skin) once every three weeks or 120,000 Units injected under the skin once every three weeks or ARANESP (darbepoetin alfa) 500 mcg injected under the skin once every three weeks for up to 13 weeks. PROCRIT (epoetin alfa) 80,000 Units and 120,000 Units given once every three weeks are doses and schedules that are not approved for use in the United States and are under investigation, while the ARANESP dose and schedule are approved for use in the United States. Adult patients with specific types of cancer (confirmed non-myeloid malignancy) who are scheduled to receive cyclic chemotherapy for a minimum of 12 weeks during the study and who meet all other eligibility criteria will be enrolled. This study will be conducted in approximately 80 study sites located in the United States.

The study hypothesis is that a dosing regimen of PROCRIT (Epoetin alfa) 80,000 Units or 120,000 Units given once every three weeks is non-inferior to ARANESP 500 mcg given once every three weeks with respect to the mean hemoglobin (Hb) change from baseline to Study Week 7 in anemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Hemoglobin levels will be monitored throughout the study on a weekly basis and before each drug dose is administered. Drug dosing will be adjusted (ie, held, reduced, resumed at a lower dose) as needed to maintain hemoglobin values within desired ranges.

The maximum dose of PROCRIT (Epoetin alfa) allowed in this study is 120,000 Units every three weeks (Q3W) and the maximum dose of ARANESP (darbepoetin) is 500 mcg Q3W.

Safety evaluations will be conducted throughout the study and will consist of assessment of laboratory tests, vital signs, physical examinations. The occurrence and severity of adverse events, including thrombovascular events will be evaluated throughout the study.Periodic data monitoring of the study by an external Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) will be performed. The main responsibility of the IDMC is to conduct ongoing monitoring of safety and to report any irregularities back to the Sponsor along with recommendations regarding continuation of the study. Each patient will be assigned to one of three dosing schedules. All schedules will be administered by way of subcutaneous (under the skin) injection once every three weeks over a period of 13 weeks. The three dosing schedules are as follows: PROCRIT (epoetin alfa) 80,000 Units, PROCRIT (epoetin alfa) 120,000 Units or ARANESP (darbepoetin alfa) 500 mcg

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neoplasms Anemia Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

epoetin alfa (120,000 Units)

epoetin alfa (PROCRIT) 120,000 Units injected subcutaneously once every 3 weeks for up to 13 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

epoetin alfa

Intervention Type DRUG

80,000 Units and 120,000 Units of epoetin alfa (PROCRIT) injected subcutaneously once every 3 weeks for up to 13 weeks

epoetin alfa (80,000 Units)

epoetin alfa (PROCRIT) 80,000 Units injected subcutaneously once every 3 weeks for up to 13 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

epoetin alfa

Intervention Type DRUG

80,000 Units and 120,000 Units of epoetin alfa (PROCRIT) injected subcutaneously once every 3 weeks for up to 13 weeks

darbepoetin alfa (500 mcg)

darbepoetin alfa (ARANESP) 500 mcg injected subcutaneously the skin once every 3 weeks for up to 13 weeks

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

darbepoetin alfa

Intervention Type DRUG

500 mcg of darbepoetin alfa (ARANESP) injected subcutaneously the skin once every 3 weeks for up to 13 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

epoetin alfa

80,000 Units and 120,000 Units of epoetin alfa (PROCRIT) injected subcutaneously once every 3 weeks for up to 13 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

darbepoetin alfa

500 mcg of darbepoetin alfa (ARANESP) injected subcutaneously the skin once every 3 weeks for up to 13 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

PROCRIT ARANESP

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histologically confirmed diagnosis of a non-myeloid malignancy
* Baseline hemoglobin (Hb) value of \<= 11.0 g/dL unrelated to transfusion
* No Packed Red Blood Cell (PRBC) or platelet transfusions in the 28 days prior to randomization
* Scheduled to receive chemotherapy for a minimum of 12 weeks during the study
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status 0 - 2

Exclusion Criteria

* No planned non-palliative radiation during the study
* No current anemia due to factors other than cancer/chemotherapy (eg, iron deficiency or gastrointestinal bleeding)
* No uncontrolled hypertension (defined as systolic pressure \> 180 and/or a diastolic pressure \> 100 mmHg while receiving antihypertension therapy)
* No history of Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT) or Pulmonary Embolus (PE) within 12 months before study enrollment. Prior superficial thrombophlebitis is not an exclusion criterion
* No history of Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA), Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA), Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) including unstable angina and myocardial infarction with or without ST elevation, or other arterial thrombosis within 6 months before study enrollment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ortho Biotech Clinical Affairs, L.L.C.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L. C. Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Glendale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Bakersfield, California, United States

Site Status

Corona, California, United States

Site Status

Fountain Valley, California, United States

Site Status

Fullerton, California, United States

Site Status

Greenbrae, California, United States

Site Status

Irvine, California, United States

Site Status

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

La Verne, California, United States

Site Status

Lancaster, California, United States

Site Status

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Northridge, California, United States

Site Status

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Rancho Mirage, California, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Norwich, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Gainsville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Kissimmee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Lecanto, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pensacola, Florida, United States

Site Status

Athens, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Griffin, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Centralia, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Gurnee, Illinois, United States

Site Status

North Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Olympia Fields, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Park Ridge, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

New Albany, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Hutchinson, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Paducah, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Free Soil, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Lansing, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Southfield, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Tupelo, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Englewood, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Clifton Springs, New York, United States

Site Status

Lake Success, New York, United States

Site Status

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bismarck, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pottsville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Aiken, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

North Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Sumter, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Johnson City, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Bryan, Texas, United States

Site Status

El Paso, Texas, United States

Site Status

Galveston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Grapevine, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Tyler, Texas, United States

Site Status

Chesapeake, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Newport News, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Woodbridge, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Vancouver, Washington, United States

Site Status

Walla Walla, Washington, United States

Site Status

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EPOANE2007

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR012985

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Chemotherapy Related Anemia
NCT00035607 COMPLETED PHASE2
The Duration Study
NCT00210730 TERMINATED PHASE3