Significance of an Elimination and Provocation Diet in Patients With Chronic Urticaria

NCT ID: NCT00385372

Last Updated: 2009-01-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-01-31

Study Completion Date

2007-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with chronic urticaria undertake a five week elimination diet (pseudoallergen free diet). The efficacy of the diet will be determined by symptom score, by the use of rescue medication (oral antihistamines and glucocorticosteroids) and by a Quality of Life Questionnaire on week 0 and week 5. All patients with sufficient response (regarding the urticaria score) enter a second dietary part over six weeks, whereas a provocation diet is carried out. Each diet week a choice of pseudoallergen rich food is added, sorted by the type of pseudoallergens (e.g. biogenic amines, organic acids, flavours, additives). This study is conducted to investigate if the provocation diet could be a new diagnostic intervention to elucidate clinical relevant pseudoallergens.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Chronic urticaria is defined as a daily or almost daily spontaneous occurrence of wheals that cause itching and lasting for at least six weeks. If there is no indication of a possible eliciting agent and because approximately 70% of patients benefit from it, a low-pseudoallergen diet should be carried out for 5 weeks. Although the low-pseudoallergen diet is successful, no explanation of the underlying mechanisms exists. On DBPC oral provocation testing with known food additives, only a small amount of patients, who experienced remission after a low-pseudoallergen diet react with new wheals and/or angioedema. For this discrepancy, natural food ingredients and new food additives are included in the dietary diagnostic. The high amount of substances, which are administrated within oral provocation testing can not reflect a realistic diet situation. Often it is impossible to ingest corresponding amounts of foods to reach the same concentration such as the provocation amount. Recording change reactions between food ingredients and the individual metabolism of the patients, the "step by step" food provocation method reveals itself to be most effective. In addition, individual predilections, amounts and frequency of ingested foods, are taken into consideration.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Urticaria Angioedema

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

elimination diet

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

provocation diet

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* signed informed consent
* chronic urticaria (duration: at least 6 weeks)
* patients who suffered from urticaria and/or angio oedema at least once a week for a duration of at least 4 weeks)
* Males and females, age between 7 and 80 years
* inpatients and outpatients
* oral antihistamines and glucocorticosteroids are allowed as concomitant medication (if needed)

Exclusion Criteria

* pregnant or breastfeeding woman
* patients suffering from diabetes mellitus
* patients with cachexia
* known food allergies of food which will be administrated within the elimination diet (e.g. milk, cereals)
* isolated urticaria with known aetiology (e.g. physical urticaria, aquagene urticaria, urticaria factitia, cholinergic urticaria), Urticaria pigmentosa mastocytoses)
* patients, seemed to be uncompliant under suspicion of the investigator
Minimum Eligible Age

7 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital Muenster

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Randolf Brehler, senior MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital Münster, Department of Dermatology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Clinics of Münster, Department of Dermatology

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bunselmeyer B, Laubach HJ, Schiller M, Stanke M, Luger TA, Brehler R. Incremental build-up food challenge--a new diagnostic approach to evaluate pseudoallergic reactions in chronic urticaria: a pilot study: stepwise food challenge in chronic urticaria. Clin Exp Allergy. 2009 Jan;39(1):116-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.03110.x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19137651 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BBU_PAD_CU_1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Food Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy
NCT04222491 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE2