An Adequate Cost Effective Follow Up Protocol For Bone & Soft Tissue Sarcomas - A Prospective Randomized Trial

NCT ID: NCT00384735

Last Updated: 2020-10-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

500 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-01-01

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact on overall survival of an intensive follow-up protocol (as practiced today at TMH) against a more cost effective follow-up protocol in patients operated for extremity sarcoma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Follow up studies are performed for a variety of reasons. The detection of a recurrence of the index lesion is the foundation of surveillance. Detection of other medical conditions is a secondary benefit. Psychologically, follow up testing can serve as a source of reassurance. Whether an increased frequency of follow up and the use of various expensive imaging modalities for screening and early detection of recurrence actually results in improving overall survival of patients with extremity sarcomas is a question that remains as yet unanswered. Currently followed post -operative surveillance regimes are empirical and vary widely from centre to centre. Allocation of limited health funding should be guided by evidence based recommendations rather than empirical beliefs. An ideal surveillance regime should meet the criteria of easy implementation, accuracy and cost effectiveness.

In a vast country like India where patients often travel thousands of kilometers in their search for quality medical care the frequency of routine follow up visits is as important as studying the role of expensive screening modalities while drawing up guidelines for cost effective follow up strategies.

This study, a prospective randomized controlled trial, attempts to outline guidelines regarding the role of follow up vis a vis frequency and the use of various imaging modalities for early detection of recurrence in improving overall survival of patients with extremity sarcomas.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sarcoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1A

Intensive - 3 monthly follow up

No interventions assigned to this group

1B

Intensive - 6 monthly follow up

No interventions assigned to this group

IIA

Cost Effective - 3 monthly follow up

No interventions assigned to this group

IIB

Cost Effective - 6 monthly follow up

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients operated for primary or recurrent extremity bone \& soft tissue sarcomas.(both limb salvage and amputations)
2. Non Metastatic at presentation.
3. Patients reliable for follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Non-extremity sarcomas.
2. Metastatic at presentation
3. Patients unreliable for follow up.
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Year

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tata Memorial Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Terry Fox Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Ajay Puri

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dr. Ajay Puri

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tata Memorial Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tata Memorial Hospital

Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

India

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Puri A, Gulia A, Hawaldar R, Ranganathan P, Badwe RA. Does intensity of surveillance affect survival after surgery for sarcomas? Results of a randomized noninferiority trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 May;472(5):1568-75. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3385-9. Epub 2013 Nov 19.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24249538 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TOSS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.