Comparing Carbon Ion Therapy, Surgery, and Proton Therapy for Management of Pelvic Sarcomas Involving the Bone

NCT ID: NCT05033288

Last Updated: 2025-10-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

72 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-01-20

Study Completion Date

2028-08-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study compares carbon ion therapy, surgery, and proton therapy to determine if one has better disease control and fewer side effects. There are three types of radiation treatment used for pelvic bone sarcomas: surgery with or without photon/proton therapy, proton therapy alone, and carbon ion therapy alone. The purpose of this study is to compare quality of life among patients treated for pelvic bone sarcomas across the world, and to determine if carbon ion therapy improves quality of life compared to surgery and disease control compared with proton therapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Demonstrate whether carbon ion therapy provides improved patient reported health related quality of life (PRO-HRQOL) outcomes and less significant toxicities compared with surgery.

II. Demonstrate whether carbon ion therapy provides improved local control versus proton therapy.

OUTLINE:

Patients complete quality of life questionnaires over 20 minutes at baseline (before any therapy), 2-4 and 5-9 months after completion of therapy, and then annually for up to 5 years. Patients' medical records are also reviewed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bone Sarcoma Chondrosarcoma Chordoma Ewing Sarcoma of Bone Pelvic Rhabdomyosarcoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Observational (questionnaires, medical record review)

Patients complete quality of life questionnaires over 20 minutes at baseline (before any therapy), 2-4 and 5-9 months after completion of therapy, and then annually for up to 5 years. Patients' medical records are also reviewed.

Electronic Health Record Review

Intervention Type OTHER

Medical records are reviewed

Quality-of-Life Assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

Complete quality of life questionnaires

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Electronic Health Record Review

Medical records are reviewed

Intervention Type OTHER

Quality-of-Life Assessment

Complete quality of life questionnaires

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Quality of Life Assessment

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Males and females \>= 15 years of age
* Newly diagnosed, histologic confirmation of pelvic chordoma, chondrosarcoma, osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma with bone involvement, rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) with bone involvement or non-RMS soft tissue sarcoma with bone involvement
* No evidence of distant sarcoma metastases as determined by clinical examination and any form of imaging
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) =\< 2
* Patients capable of childbearing must agree to use adequate contraception
* Ability to complete questionnaire(s) by themselves or with assistance
* Ability to provide written informed consent
* Chemotherapy per institutional guidelines is allowed

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients receiving palliative treatment
* Recurrent disease
* Males and females \< 15 years of age
* Previous radiation therapy to the site of the sarcoma or area surrounding it such that it would be partially or completely encompassed by the radiation volume needed to treat the current sarcoma. In other words, treatment on this study would require re-irradiation of tissues
* Patients with distant sarcoma metastases
* Benign pelvic bone histologies
* Any of the following:

* Pregnant women
* Nursing women
* Men or women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mayo Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bradford S. Hoppe, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mayo Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mayo Clinic in Arizona

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Mayo Clinic in Florida

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Clinical Trials Referral Office

Role: CONTACT

855-776-0015

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Clinical Trials Referral Office

Role: primary

855-776-0015

Clinical Trials Referral Office

Role: primary

855-776-0015

Clinical Trials Referral Office

Role: primary

855-776-0015

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCI-2021-08847

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

MC210709

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

21-004080

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ROF2181

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

MC210709

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.