Prospective Evaluation of Elastic Restraint to LESSen the Effects of Heart Failure (PEERLESS-HF) Trial

NCT ID: NCT00382863

Last Updated: 2012-07-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

220 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-10-31

Study Completion Date

2012-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine if patients in the HeartNet Ventricular Support System with optimal medical and device therapy arm (Treatment group) show statistically significant improvement compared to patients in the optimal medical and device therapy alone arm (Control group) after 6 months of follow-up.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In the United States alone, more than five million people suffer from heart failure (CHF) and an estimated 400,000 to 700,000 new cases are diagnosed each year. Caused by a variety of cardiac conditions, systolic heart failire (HF) is the end-stage of heart disease where the heart is failing as a pump. Once diagnosed with the disease, less than 50% of the patients live for five years, and less than 25% survive for more than ten years. The number of deaths in the United States from this condition has more than doubled since 1979, averaging more than 250,000 annually.

Paracor Medical, Inc. has developed an elastic prosthetic wrap that is designed to apply a gentle mechanical support to the failing heart. The Implant is a compliant elastic structure that is designed to conform to the epicardial surface of the right and left ventricles. It supports the heart throughout the cardiac cycle and was designed to offload the ventricles and reduce wall stress.

The objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the HeartNet Ventricular Support System with optimal medical and device therapy (Treatment group) when compared to optimal medical and device therapy (i.e., medications, cardiac resynchronisation therapy, pacemaker) alone (Control group) as treatments for patients with heart failure.

Efficacy of the HeartNet Ventricular Support System in the Treatment group compared to the optimal medical and device therapy Control group will be evaluated based upon cardiopulmonary tests (Peak VO2), six (6) minute walk distance and quality of life assessment, as measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) questionnaire.

Safety of the HeartNet Ventricular Support System in the Treatment group compared to the Control group will be evaluated based on the all-cause mortality rate.

Paracor Medical intends to submit data obtained in this clinical trial to support a Pre-Market Approval Application to the United States Food and Drug Administration.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart Failure

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

heart failure cardiac support Paracor HeartNet PEERLESS-HF

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Treatment

HeartNet and Optimal Medical/Device Therapy (e.g., medications and cardiac resynchronisation therapy)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

HeartNet Ventricular Support System

Intervention Type DEVICE

The HeartNet Implant is placed on the epicardial surface of the heart surrounding both the left and right ventricles.

Control

Optimal Medical/Device Therapy alone (e.g., medications and/or cardiac resynchronisation therapy) (Note: For the purpose of the PEERLESS-HF study, optimal medical therapy is defined as the use of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and Beta blockers in the highest tolerable doses for three months prior to study enrollment, and Optimal device therapy is defined as cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) for at least three months prior to study enrollment, when indicated.)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Optimal Medical/Device Therapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Optimal Medical/Device Therapy - For the purpose of the PEERLESS-HF study, optimal medical therapy is defined as the use of ACE inhibitors and Beta blockers in the highest tolerable doses for three months prior to study enrollment, and Optimal device therapy is defined as CRT or CRT-D for at least three months prior to study enrollment, when indicated.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

HeartNet Ventricular Support System

The HeartNet Implant is placed on the epicardial surface of the heart surrounding both the left and right ventricles.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Optimal Medical/Device Therapy

Optimal Medical/Device Therapy - For the purpose of the PEERLESS-HF study, optimal medical therapy is defined as the use of ACE inhibitors and Beta blockers in the highest tolerable doses for three months prior to study enrollment, and Optimal device therapy is defined as CRT or CRT-D for at least three months prior to study enrollment, when indicated.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

cardiac support heart failure medications

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Symptomatic heart failure at enrollment (American College of Cardiology \[ACC\]/American Heart Association \[AHA\] Stage C) due to ischemic or nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy
2. On stable, evidence-based medical and device therapy for heart failure for 3 months prior to randomization \<a\> Pharmacological Therapy (as appropriate) \<i\> angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) for patients with ACE inhibitor intolerance or nitrate/hydralazine at the investigators discretion \<ii\> beta blockers \<iii\> diuretics, aldosterone inhibitors \<b\> Ejection fraction \< or = to 35% while maintained on optimal medical therapy \<c\> Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT), Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator (CRT-D) \<i\> If implanted with a CRT or CRT-D, it must be implanted \> or = to 3 months before randomization \<ii\> If currently eligible or anticipated eligibility with a CRT or CRT-D within 6 months, the patient should not be enrolled in the study

Specific Qualifying Characteristics

1. Six (6) minute walk of 150 - 450m
2. Peak VO2 for males: 10.0-20.0 ml/kg/min; Peak VO2 for females: 9.0-18.0 ml/kg/min
3. Left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) \<85mm and index \<40mm/m2 (LVEDD/BSA)
4. Heart failure duration \> or = to 6 months

Exclusion Criteria

Patient History

1. Heart failure due to a reversible condition
2. Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM)
3. Left ventricular assist device (LVAD), intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or intravenous inotropes are required or the patient has end stage heart failure despite maintenance on best medical therapy
4. Myxoma
5. Active infection, sepsis, endocarditis, myocarditis or pericarditis
6. Myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, cardiac or other major surgery, or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or pacemaker implantation in the 3 months prior to entry
7. Positive pregnancy test for pre-menopausal female
8. Less than 18 years or \> or = to 75 years old
9. Hemoglobin level less than 10 gm/dL or creatinine \>2.5 mg/dL
10. Uncontrolled medical conditions that increase surgical risk
11. Co-morbid condition that in the investigator's opinion reduces life expectancy to less than 2 years

Surgical or Anatomical Considerations

1. Heart measurement too large or small for Implant sizes
2. Restrictive cardiomyopathy
3. Not a candidate for sternotomy or standard thoracotomy surgical approaches
4. Expected to have adhesions from previous surgical procedures
5. History of constrictive pericarditis
6. Previously placed coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) or anticipated need for coronary artery bypass grafting
7. Not a candidate for cardiopulmonary bypass
8. Anatomical mitral valve regurgitation of 2+ or greater at the time of enrollment
9. Pulmonary function testing with the following results: Forced expiratory volume (FEV1) \<1L or if FEV1 is between 1 and 3L, forced expiratory volume divided by forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) \<60%
10. Cardiac or thoracic condition that might require operative correction. Cardiac transplantation is not included in this exclusion criterion.
11. Other elective surgical procedure at the time of the index hospitalization or within 30 days, whichever is longer

Other

1. Any other medical condition that, in the judgment of the investigator, makes the patient a poor candidate for this procedure
2. Currently enrolled or has participated in the last 30 days in another therapeutic or interventional clinical study
3. Unwilling/unable to comply with follow-up
4. Unwilling/unable to give signed informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

74 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Paracor Medical, Inc

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

William T. Abraham, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chief, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Ohio State University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

USC Keck School of Medicine

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

University of California, San Francisco, Medical Center

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

University of Colorado Health Sciences Center

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Christiana Care Health System

Newark, Delaware, United States

Site Status

University of Florida

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Emory University

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Midwest Heart Foundation

Lombard, Illinois, United States

Site Status

St. Vincent Hospital and Health Services

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Genesis Medical Center

Davenport, Iowa, United States

Site Status

University of Maryland, Division of Cardiology

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Caritas St. Elizabeth's Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Wayne State University/ Oakwood Hospital

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis VA Medical Center

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

St. Paul Heart Clinic

Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Mid America Heart Institute

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

BryanLGH Heart Improvement Program

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Morristown Memorial Hospital

Morristown, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

University of Rochester Medical Center

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Montefiore Medical Center

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

The Lindner Clinical Trial Center

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

The Ohio State University Medical Center

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma Heart Hospital

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Allegheny General Hospital

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

The Stern Cardiovascular Center

Germantown, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Tennessee Cardiovascular Research Institute

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Intermountain Medical Center

Murray, Utah, United States

Site Status

Inova Heart & Vascular Institute/ Fairfax Hospital

Falls Church, Virginia, United States

Site Status

University of Calgary

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

St. Paul's Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

St. Boniface General Hospital

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

London Health Sciences Centre

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto General Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

McGill University Hospital Centre

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Abraham WT, Anand I, Aranda JM Jr, Boehmer J, Costanzo MR, DeMarco T, Holcomb R, Ivanhoe R, Kolber M, Rayburn B. Randomized controlled trial of ventricular elastic support therapy in the treatment of symptomatic heart failure: rationale and design. Am Heart J. 2012 Nov;164(5):638-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.07.015. Epub 2012 Oct 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23137493 (View on PubMed)

Keteyian SJ, Brawner CA, Ehrman JK, Ivanhoe R, Boehmer JP, Abraham WT; PEERLESS-HF Trial Investigators. Reproducibility of peak oxygen uptake and other cardiopulmonary exercise parameters: implications for clinical trials and clinical practice. Chest. 2010 Oct;138(4):950-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-2624. Epub 2010 Jun 3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 20522572 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

200

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id