Feasibility of Placing Bravo PH Capsule in Proximal Esophagus
NCT ID: NCT00378898
Last Updated: 2017-04-04
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
39 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-09-30
2009-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
There will be no difference in patient-perception of a proximally-placed Bravo esophageal pH monitor compared with a distal monitor.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Development of Applications of the Bravo® pH Monitoring System and Evaluation of Its Performance (Encore)
NCT01788085
Oesophageal Acid Exposure in Healthy Subjects Over 96 Hours
NCT03417817
Correlations Between Wireless pH Monitoring and Variation in Reflux Symptom Questionnaire, 7 Day Recall
NCT03407456
Comparison of Acid Reflux at Two Levels in the Esophagus Using the BRAVO Capsule
NCT00579410
Development of Applications of the Bravo® pH Monitoring System and Evaluation of Its Performance
NCT01503476
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Poor sensitivity of catheter based pH monitoring in detecting acid reflux may be due to day to day variability of test, its less than adequate reliability as well as possible intermittent nature of the reflux events (not recorded in only a 24-hour period) (4). Additionally, since the traditional ambulatory device is commonly placed transnasally through the oropharynx into the esophagus, patients often complain of throat and nose discomfort and usually restrict their daily activity. This potentially leads to false negative findings and reduced test sensitivity. Furthermore, incorrect results may be collected if the pH electrode slips away from the initial manometrically determined placement site. In light of these limitations, a new wireless (catheter free) pH monitoring device was developed to improve patient comfort and increase test sensitivity. The Bravo pH monitoring system (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN) uses a radiotelemetric capsule temporarily attached to the esophageal mucosa which transmits pH data to a receiver carried on patient's belt.
Although well studied in the distal esophagus, there are currently no studies in adults assessing the feasibility and patient tolerance to placement of this device more proximally. Such a placement may increase the sensitivity of the test and add to our ability to study potential predictors of treatment response in patients with extraesophageal GERD.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
EGD with proximal BRAVO capsule
Subjects have a second BRAVO capsule placed 10cm proximal to prior BRAVO capsule placement. Fluoroscopy is used to confirm detachment of the monitor 7 days after investigational deployment.
BRAVO capsule
Fluoroscopy
one time "xray" to determine evacuation of bravo
EGD with sham BRAVO capsule placement
Subjects have a EGD with BRAVO delivery introducer positioned 10cm proximal to prior BRAVO capsule placement with no BRAVO placed.
sham BRAVO capsule placement
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
BRAVO capsule
Fluoroscopy
one time "xray" to determine evacuation of bravo
sham BRAVO capsule placement
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients having regularly scheduled upper endoscopy with planned Bravo pH monitor testing
* Patients with known GERD based on symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation) and response to a proton pump inhibitor or esophagitis on EGD as well as those with extraesophageal GERD (cough, asthma and throat discomfort).
Exclusion Criteria
* History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
* Stroke or transient ischemic attack within the past 6 months
* GI bleeding within the previous 6 months
* Known esophageal varices
* Significant medical illness (i.e., congestive heart failure)
* Pregnancy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michael Vaezi
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael F Vaezi, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Vanderbilt University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Vanderbilt Clinic/ Endoscopy Lab
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
060724
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.