Muscle Contraction in Patients With Focal Hand Dystonia
NCT ID: NCT00376753
Last Updated: 2017-07-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
84 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2006-09-11
2011-05-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Healthy volunteers and patients with FHD over 18 years of age may be eligible for this study. Candidates are screened with a physical and neurological examination.
In a series of three experiments conducted during a single clinic visit, participants undergo transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) while performing a finger movement. A wire coil is placed on the subject's scalp. A brief electrical current is passed through the coil, creating a magnetic pulse that travels through the scalp and skull and causes small electrical currents in the outer part of the brain. The stimulation may cause muscle, hand or arm twitching, or may affect movement or reflexes. During the stimulation, the subject is asked to contract one finger.
In addition to TMS, subjects have surface electromyography. For this test, they sit in a chair with their hands placed on a pillow on their lap. The electrical activity of three muscles in the right hand is recorded by electrodes (small metal disks) taped to the skin over the muscles.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Movement-Related Brain Networks Involved in Hand Dystonia
NCT00137384
Neurophysiology of Task-Specificity of Focal Hand Dystonia
NCT00309010
Depotentiation in People With Focal Hand Dystonia
NCT02106936
fMRI Studies of Task Specificity in Focal Hand Dystonia
NCT00310414
Long-Term Motor Learning in Focal Hand Dystonia
NCT00325091
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In sensory systems, a neural mechanism called surround inhibition (SI) sharpens sensation by creating an inhibitory zone around the central core of activation. This principle was described for the visual system first, but there is evidence for similar mechanisms in the primary motor cortex (M1) involved in movement generation and control, especially in precise motor tasks. Dystonia is generally regarded as a motor execution abnormality due to a dysfunction in the cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical motor loop. Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), recent findings point to highly task-specific impairment of motor cortical inhibition in patients with focal hand dystonia (FHD).
The goal for this research proposal is to understand the underlying physiology as it relates to different inhibitory pathways on movement generation and control. To achieve this goal, different modes of voluntary contractions will be examined in healthy controls and patients with FHD with the prospect of having new options for treatment.
STUDY POPULATION:
We intend to study 100 adult patients with FHD and 100 healthy volunteers on an outpatient basis.
DESIGN:
Participants will perform a contraction of the first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI). At rest, before EMG-onset (premotor), during phasic and tonic contraction single TMS pulses (Experiment 1) or double TMS pulses (Experiment 2) will be applied over the primary motor cortex to assess activation-induced changes in cortical excitability in the abductor pollicis brevis muscle (APB), which is not activated. Additionally the influence of visual feedback on short intracortical inhibition (SICI) will be tested in Experiment 3. In Experiment 4-8 interhemispheric (IHI), ventral and dorso-lateral premotor-motor intracortical inhibition will be assessed.
OUTCOME MEASURES:
The primary outcome measure for Experiment 1 will be the difference in MEP peak-to-peak amplitude between all motor conditions.
The primary outcome measure for Experiment 2, 5, 6, 7 and 8 will be the difference in normalized MEP peak-to-peak amplitude between all motor conditions in FHD patients and healthy volunteers.
In Experiments 1 and 2, the change in MEP peak-to-peak amplitude between different force levels (10% versus 20%) will be a second outcome parameter.
The primary outcome parameter for Experiment 3 will be change in MEP peak-to-peak between patients and healthy volunteers during tonic contraction with and without visual feedback.
In Experiment 4, Hmax/Mmax ratio will be the primary outcome parameter.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
18 years old or older
Presence of FHD, for Experiment 5, 6, 7 and 8 the affected limb has to be the right and dominant side
HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS:
18 years old or older
Right handedness
Absence of dystonia or other neurological disorder with any effect on the motor or sensory systems
Exclusion Criteria
Concurrent significant medical, surgical, neurological or psychiatric condition
Taking the following medications: antidepressants, anxiolytics, anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, antiparkinson, hypnotics, stimulants, and/or antihistamines
Patients- Received botulinum toxin injection within 3 months of starting the protocol
For TMS: Presence of pacemaker, implanted medical pump, metal plate or metal object in skull or eye
History of seizure disorder
Known history of hearing loss
For MRI: Presence of pacemakers or other implanted electrical devices, brain stimulators, dental implants, aneurysm clips, metallic prostheses (including metal pins and rods, heart valves, and cochlear implants), permanent eyeliner, implanted delivery pumps, or shrapnel fragments. Welders and metal workers are also at risk for injury because of possible small metal fragments in the eye of which they may be unaware.
Pregnancy.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
NIH
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Berardelli A, Rothwell JC, Hallett M, Thompson PD, Manfredi M, Marsden CD. The pathophysiology of primary dystonia. Brain. 1998 Jul;121 ( Pt 7):1195-212. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.7.1195.
Bressman SB, de Leon D, Raymond D, Greene PE, Brin MF, Fahn S, Ozelius LJ, Breakefield XO, Kramer PL, Risch NJ. The role of the DYT1 gene in secondary dystonia. Adv Neurol. 1998;78:107-15. No abstract available.
Defazio G, Aniello MS, Masi G, Lucchese V, De Candia D, Martino D. Frequency of familial aggregation in primary adult-onset cranial cervical dystonia. Neurol Sci. 2003 Oct;24(3):168-9. doi: 10.1007/s10072-003-0113-3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
06-N-0242
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
060242
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.