Capecitabine or Observation After Surgery in Treating Patients With Biliary Tract Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00363584

Last Updated: 2013-08-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

360 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as capecitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving capecitabine after surgery may kill any tumor cells that remain after surgery. Sometimes, after surgery, the tumor may not need more treatment until it progresses. In this case, observation may be sufficient. It is not yet known whether capecitabine is more effective than observation in treating biliary tract cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying capecitabine to see how well it works compared with observation in treating patients with biliary tract cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

* To determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine has any effect on 2-year survival compared to expectant treatment alone (observation) in patients who have undergone a macroscopically complete surgical resection of a biliary tract cancer.

Secondary

* To compare capecitabine versus observation in terms of 5-year survival, relapse-free survival, toxicity, quality of life, and health economics.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Patients are stratified according to surgical center, disease site (hilar/extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma vs intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma vs gallbladder vs intrapancreatic/common bile duct), type of resection (R0 vs R1), and ECOG performance status (0 vs 1 vs 2). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

* Arm I: Patients receive oral capecitabine twice a day on days 1-14. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
* Arm II: Patients undergo expectant treatment (observation). Quality of life is assessed at baseline, every 3 months for 1 year, and then every 6 months for 1 year.

All patients are followed for up to 5 years post-randomization.

Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 360 patients will be accrued for this study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer Gallbladder Cancer Liver Cancer

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

localized resectable adult primary liver cancer cholangiocarcinoma of the extrahepatic bile duct cholangiocarcinoma of the gallbladder adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder adenocarcinoma with squamous metaplasia of the gallbladder anaplastic carcinoma of the gallbladder localized gallbladder cancer localized extrahepatic bile duct cancer squamous cell carcinoma of the gallbladder adult primary cholangiocellular carcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

capecitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

clinical observation

Intervention Type OTHER

adjuvant therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Must be able to start treatment within 12 weeks of surgery
* No pancreatic or periampullary cancer
* No mucosal gallbladder cancer

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

* ECOG performance status 0-2
* Urea \< 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
* Creatinine \< 1.5 times ULN
* Glomerular filtration rate ≥ 60 mL/min (if \< 60 mL/min, adequate renal function for capecitabine must be confirmed by isotope EDTA)
* Hemoglobin ≥ 10 g/dL
* WBC ≥ 3,000/mm³
* Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mm³
* Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm³
* Bilirubin ≤ 3 times ULN
* ALT and AST ≤ 5 times ULN
* Adequate surgical biliary drainage with no evidence of infection
* Not pregnant or nursing
* Negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing age and childbearing potential
* Fertile patients must use effective contraception during study treatment and for at least 3 months after study treatment has ended
* Must provide written informed consent
* No history of other malignant diseases within the past 5 years other than adequately treated nonmelanoma skin cancer or in situ carcinoma of the uterine cervix
* No serious co-existing medical condition likely to interfere with protocol treatment, including a potential serious infection
* No evidence of significant clinical disorder or laboratory finding that makes it undesirable for the patient to participate in the trial
* No psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical factors considered likely to preclude study compliance
* No other serious uncontrolled medical conditions
* No unresolved biliary tree obstruction

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

* See Disease Characteristics
* Completely recovered from prior surgery
* No use of other investigational agents within 28 days prior to and during study treatment
* No prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy for biliary tract cancer
* No other concurrent anticancer chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or investigational agent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clive Stubbs

Role:

Cancer Research Campaign Clinical Trials Centre

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Basildon University Hospital

Basildon, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Basingstoke and North Hampshire NHS Foundation Trust

Basingstoke, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit - Birmingham

Birmingham, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Royal Bournemouth Hospital

Bournemouth, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre

Bristol, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Addenbrooke's Hospital

Cambridge, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Walsgrave Hospital

Coventry, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Princess Alexandra Hospital

Essex, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

St. Luke's Cancer Centre at Royal Surrey County Hospital

Guildford, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Calderdale Royal Hospital

Halifax, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Huddersfield Royal Infirmary

Huddersfield, West Yorks, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Cancer Research UK Clinical Centre at St. James's University Hospital

Leeds, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Leicester Royal Infirmary

Leicester, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Leicester General Hospital

Leicester, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Royal Liverpool University Hospital

Liverpool, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Aintree University Hospital

Liverpool, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Saint Bartholomew's Hospital

London, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Helen Rollason Cancer Care Centre at North Middlesex Hospital

London, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

UCL Cancer Institute

London, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

St. Thomas' Hospital

London, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

King's College Hospital

London, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Royal Marsden - London

London, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Hammersmith Hospital

London, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

University College of London Hospitals

London, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Maidstone Hospital

Maidstone, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Christie Hospital

Manchester, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

North Manchester General Hospital - Penine Actute Hospitals Trust

Manchester, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology

Merseyside, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Northern Centre for Cancer Treatment at Newcastle General Hospital

Newcastle upon Tyne, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Freeman Hospital

Newcastle upon Tyne, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

St. Mary's Hospital

Newport, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Nottingham City Hospital

Nottingham, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Derriford Hospital

Plymouth, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Portsmouth Oncology Centre at Saint Mary's Hospital

Portsmouth Hants, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Alexandra Healthcare NHS

Redditch, Worcestershire, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Salisbury District Hospital

Salisbury, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Cancer Research Centre at Weston Park Hospital

Sheffield, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Southampton General Hospital

Southampton, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Royal Marsden - Surrey

Sutton, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Southend University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Westcliff-on-Sea, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Yeovil District Hospital

Yeovil, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Ninewells Hospital

Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom

Site Status

Edinburgh Cancer Centre at Western General Hospital

Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom

Site Status

Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre

Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom

Site Status

Perth Royal Infirmary

Perth, Scotland, United Kingdom

Site Status

Velindre Cancer Center at Velindre Hospital

Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Keller HR, Fluke L, Forrester JA, Wolf RF. Identifying Indications for Neoadjuvant Therapy in Cholangiocarcinoma. Oncology (Williston Park). 2024 Apr 11;38(4):160-162. doi: 10.46883/2024.25921017.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38661512 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CRUK-HE3002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

EU-20629

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

EUDRACT-2005-003318-13

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ISRCTN72785446

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CRUK-BILCAP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CRUK-BIBF1120

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CDR0000492266

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id