ICTUS Study: International Citicoline Trial on Acute Stroke
NCT ID: NCT00331890
Last Updated: 2012-06-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
2298 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-10-31
2012-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety and Efficacy Study in Acute Ischaemic Stroke
NCT00144014
Citicoline in Ischemic Stroke, a Randomized Trial
NCT06210646
Citicoline in Ischemic Stroke
NCT05154903
An International Observational Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Thrombolysis in Stroke
NCT02229890
Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Sovateltide in Patients With Acute Cerebral Ischemic Stroke
NCT05691244
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
After a stroke, different evolutions and outcomes can be observed, and there are several factors that may influence the outcome, such as age, cognitive impairment, and psycho-social factors. The most important prognostic factors for acute ischemic stroke are the volume of the cerebral infarction and the severity of the baseline neurological deficit.
In recent years, stroke has been considered a real medical emergency, and for this reason several clinical trials have been conducted to find effective therapies. Among pharmacological therapies, there are two possible ways to treat ischemic strokes: treatments directed to recanalize the occluded artery, such as thrombolysis, and the neuroprotective drugs.
None of the neuroprotective drugs have attained the international approval for this indication. Among the reasons for the failures obtained with the different drugs tested, we must highlight the problems derived from the toxicity of the drugs and from the evaluation criteria, as well as the therapeutic window used.
To evaluate a drug in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke, one must be very careful when defining the schedule of the clinical trial, and which variable or variables may be considered as primary endpoints. Several endpoints have been used in the different clinical trials developed, although the most used are those referring to the functional status and the degree of disability of the patients, normally set at 3 months after the stroke.
After the onset of an ischemic stroke in the brain, there is a cascade of events that are responsible for neuronal disruption, neuronal membrane breakdown and/or neuronal apoptosis, specifically in the penumbra area. Therapies acting by blocking the ischemic cascade, at least partially, and/or stabilizing neuronal membranes are believed to be beneficial protecting the brain from the progressive effects of ischemia. Among the neuroprotective drugs, there is a new class of drugs, of which the main representative is citicoline. Citicoline monosodium is an exogenous form of CDP-Choline, which is essential for the biosynthesis of membrane phospholipids. The mechanisms of action of citicoline include the stimulation of the biosynthesis of phospholipids of the neuronal membrane, the inhibition of the activity of some phospholipases, the restoration of some enzymatic activities bound to neuronal membranes, and the elevation of brain levels of some catecholamines.
The previous clinical trials performed with citicoline were no conclusive, with some positive results. In all these studies, citicoline was found to have a similar safety profile as compared with placebo.
The variety of outcomes and results of the different trials made it difficult to arrive at a consensus on the efficacy of the drug. That is the reason why a Pooling Data Analysis using updated individual patient data was done, with the main objective to determine the effects of citicoline on the improvement, functional and neurological, of patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with different doses of citicoline for 6 weeks and with a follow-up period of 6 weeks. The results obtained in this Pooling Data Analysis showed that the odds ratio of achieving a complete recovery was 33 % higher in citicoline-treated patients than in placebo-treated patients, with the best response obtained with the dose of 2000 mg/d/6 weeks.
The primary objective of this study is to determine the effects on recovery at 3 months of oral citicoline 2000 mg/d/6 weeks, after 6 weeks of treatment and 6 weeks of follow-up, in patients with moderate-to-severe acute ischemic strokes (baseline NIHSS equal or higher than 8) in comparison with placebo.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Active
Receives active drug
Citicoline
1g/12h iv during 3 days and then orally until complete 6 weeks of treatment
Placebo
Receives a placebo
Placebo
As active drug
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Citicoline
1g/12h iv during 3 days and then orally until complete 6 weeks of treatment
Placebo
As active drug
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients must be treated within 24 hours of their initial stroke symptoms onset.
* Patients with a measurable focal neurological deficit lasting for a minimum of 60 minutes.
* Patients must have a CT scan and/or conventional MRI compatible with the clinical diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke prior to being randomized.
* Patients must have an acute ischemic stroke referable to the middle cerebral artery territory
* At inclusion, NIHSS score \> 7, with at least 2 of these points from sections 5 \& 6 (motor)
* Immediately (i.e. minutes) pre-stroke, MRS \< 2
* Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test prior to enrolment
* Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* CT or conventional MRI evidence of brain tumor, cerebral edema with a clinically significant mass midline shift with compression of the ventricles, brainstem or cerebellar infarction, subarachnoid and/or intracerebral and/or intraventricular hemorrhage
* History of ventricular dysrhythmias, acute myocardial infarction within 72 hours prior to enrolment, unstable angina, decompensated congestive heart failure or any other acute, severe, uncontrollable or sustained cardiovascular condition that, in the Investigator's opinion, may interfere with effective participation in the study
* Previous disorders that may confound the interpretation of the neurological scales
* Drug addiction-related disorders
* Pre existing dementia, when dementia implies a disability, measured as an score of 2 or higher in the previous MRS
* Pre existing medical condition that, in the Investigator's opinion, may interfere with the patient's suitability and participation in the study
* Patients participating in another clinical trial or receiving a non-approved drug (clinical investigational drug) less than 30 days prior to screening
* Patients under current treatment with citicoline
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ferrer Internacional S.A.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Antoni Dávalos, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona (Spain)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Klinikum AltenburgerLand GmbH
Altenburg, , Germany
Neurologie EVKB
Bielefeld, , Germany
Neurologische Klinik Heinrich-Heine Universität
Düsseldorf, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen
Erlangen, , Germany
Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald
Greifswald, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, , Germany
Neurologische Klinik Universitatsklinikum Heidelberg
Heidelberg, , Germany
Klinikum Ingolstadt
Ingolstadt, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
Leipzig, , Germany
Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden
Minden, , Germany
Klinikum Großhadern der Universität München
München, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Münster
Münster, , Germany
Hospital de Sao Jose
Lisbon, Lisbon District, Portugal
Hospital de Sao Joao
Porto, Porto District, Portugal
Hospital Garcia de Orta, EPE
Almada, , Portugal
Hospital Garcia de Orta
Almada, , Portugal
Hospital Fernando Fonseca
Amadora - Sintra, , Portugal
Hospital Sao Marcos
Braga, , Portugal
Hospitais da Universidade Coimbra
Coimbra, , Portugal
Centro Hospitalar de Coimbra
Coimbra, , Portugal
Hospital de Santa Maria
Lisbon, , Portugal
Hospital de Santo Antonio
Porto, , Portugal
Hospital Sao Sebastiao
Santa Maria da Feira, , Portugal
Centro Hospitalar de Setúbal, EPE
Setúbal, , Portugal
Centro Hospitalar de Setúbal
Setúbal, , Portugal
Hospital Sao Pedro
Vila Real, , Portugal
Hospital General de Albacete
Albacete, Albacete, Spain
Hospital Son Dureta
Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol
Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
Hospital del Mar
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Hospital Sagrat Cor
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Hospital Vall d´Hebron
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
Hospital de Mataro
Mataró, Barcelona, Spain
Consorci Hospitalari Parc Tauli
Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
Hospital Moises Broggi
Sant Joan Despí, Barcelona, Spain
Hospital General Yague
Burgos, Burgos, Spain
Hospital San Pedro de Alcantara
Cáceres, Caceres, Spain
Hospital de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta
Girona, Girona, Spain
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago
Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, Spain
Hospital de Leon
León, Leon, Spain
Hospital Arnau de Vilanova
Lleida, Lleida, Spain
Complejo Hospitalario Xeral Calde
Lugo, Lugo, Spain
Hospital de La Princesa
Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañon
Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Hospital Ramon y Cajal
Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Hospital Clinico San Carlos
Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Hospital Central de Defensa (del Aire)
Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Hospital de Navarra
Pamplona, Navarre, Spain
Hospital Meixoeiro
Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain
Hospital Virgen Macarena
Seville, Sevilla, Spain
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
Seville, Sevilla, Spain
Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora De Valme
Seville, Sevilla, Spain
Hospital Universitario La Fe
Valencia, Valencia, Spain
Hospital Clinico Universitario
Valencia, Valencia, Spain
Hospital General Universitario de Valencia
Valencia, Valencia, Spain
Hospital Universitario
Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
Hospital de Cruces
Barakaldo, Vizcaya, Spain
Hospital de Basurto
Bilbao, Vizcaya, Spain
Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova
Lleida, , Spain
Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla
Santander, , Spain
Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla
Santander, , Spain
Hospital Clínico de Valladolid
Valladolid, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bolland K, Whitehead J, Cobo E, Secades JJ. Evaluation of a sequential global test of improved recovery following stroke as applied to the ICTUS trial of citicoline. Pharm Stat. 2009 Apr-Jun;8(2):136-49. doi: 10.1002/pst.344.
Davalos A, Alvarez-Sabin J, Castillo J, Diez-Tejedor E, Ferro J, Martinez-Vila E, Serena J, Segura T, Cruz VT, Masjuan J, Cobo E, Secades JJ; International Citicoline Trial on acUte Stroke (ICTUS) trial investigators. Citicoline in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke: an international, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled study (ICTUS trial). Lancet. 2012 Jul 28;380(9839):349-57. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60813-7. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GF-ICTUS-04
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.