ICTUS Study: International Citicoline Trial on Acute Stroke

NCT ID: NCT00331890

Last Updated: 2012-06-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

2298 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-10-31

Study Completion Date

2012-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Citicoline is a safe drug approved in some countries for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. The drug has shown some evidence of efficacy in a pooled analysis, based on four clinical trials done in USA with oral citicoline.The purpose of the study is confirm the results obtained in the pooled analysis, that is, evidence of efficacy in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The stroke or brain attack is one of the main health problems in developed countries. It is the third cause for death and the main cause of disability in adults. Cerebral infarction makes up 80 % of all the types of strokes.

After a stroke, different evolutions and outcomes can be observed, and there are several factors that may influence the outcome, such as age, cognitive impairment, and psycho-social factors. The most important prognostic factors for acute ischemic stroke are the volume of the cerebral infarction and the severity of the baseline neurological deficit.

In recent years, stroke has been considered a real medical emergency, and for this reason several clinical trials have been conducted to find effective therapies. Among pharmacological therapies, there are two possible ways to treat ischemic strokes: treatments directed to recanalize the occluded artery, such as thrombolysis, and the neuroprotective drugs.

None of the neuroprotective drugs have attained the international approval for this indication. Among the reasons for the failures obtained with the different drugs tested, we must highlight the problems derived from the toxicity of the drugs and from the evaluation criteria, as well as the therapeutic window used.

To evaluate a drug in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke, one must be very careful when defining the schedule of the clinical trial, and which variable or variables may be considered as primary endpoints. Several endpoints have been used in the different clinical trials developed, although the most used are those referring to the functional status and the degree of disability of the patients, normally set at 3 months after the stroke.

After the onset of an ischemic stroke in the brain, there is a cascade of events that are responsible for neuronal disruption, neuronal membrane breakdown and/or neuronal apoptosis, specifically in the penumbra area. Therapies acting by blocking the ischemic cascade, at least partially, and/or stabilizing neuronal membranes are believed to be beneficial protecting the brain from the progressive effects of ischemia. Among the neuroprotective drugs, there is a new class of drugs, of which the main representative is citicoline. Citicoline monosodium is an exogenous form of CDP-Choline, which is essential for the biosynthesis of membrane phospholipids. The mechanisms of action of citicoline include the stimulation of the biosynthesis of phospholipids of the neuronal membrane, the inhibition of the activity of some phospholipases, the restoration of some enzymatic activities bound to neuronal membranes, and the elevation of brain levels of some catecholamines.

The previous clinical trials performed with citicoline were no conclusive, with some positive results. In all these studies, citicoline was found to have a similar safety profile as compared with placebo.

The variety of outcomes and results of the different trials made it difficult to arrive at a consensus on the efficacy of the drug. That is the reason why a Pooling Data Analysis using updated individual patient data was done, with the main objective to determine the effects of citicoline on the improvement, functional and neurological, of patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with different doses of citicoline for 6 weeks and with a follow-up period of 6 weeks. The results obtained in this Pooling Data Analysis showed that the odds ratio of achieving a complete recovery was 33 % higher in citicoline-treated patients than in placebo-treated patients, with the best response obtained with the dose of 2000 mg/d/6 weeks.

The primary objective of this study is to determine the effects on recovery at 3 months of oral citicoline 2000 mg/d/6 weeks, after 6 weeks of treatment and 6 weeks of follow-up, in patients with moderate-to-severe acute ischemic strokes (baseline NIHSS equal or higher than 8) in comparison with placebo.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Stroke Cerebral Infarction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active

Receives active drug

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Citicoline

Intervention Type DRUG

1g/12h iv during 3 days and then orally until complete 6 weeks of treatment

Placebo

Receives a placebo

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

As active drug

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Citicoline

1g/12h iv during 3 days and then orally until complete 6 weeks of treatment

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

As active drug

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

CDP-choline

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female, \>18 years old
* Patients must be treated within 24 hours of their initial stroke symptoms onset.
* Patients with a measurable focal neurological deficit lasting for a minimum of 60 minutes.
* Patients must have a CT scan and/or conventional MRI compatible with the clinical diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke prior to being randomized.
* Patients must have an acute ischemic stroke referable to the middle cerebral artery territory
* At inclusion, NIHSS score \> 7, with at least 2 of these points from sections 5 \& 6 (motor)
* Immediately (i.e. minutes) pre-stroke, MRS \< 2
* Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test prior to enrolment
* Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients in coma: patients having a score of 2 or higher in the items regarding the level of consciousness in the NIHSS (1a)
* CT or conventional MRI evidence of brain tumor, cerebral edema with a clinically significant mass midline shift with compression of the ventricles, brainstem or cerebellar infarction, subarachnoid and/or intracerebral and/or intraventricular hemorrhage
* History of ventricular dysrhythmias, acute myocardial infarction within 72 hours prior to enrolment, unstable angina, decompensated congestive heart failure or any other acute, severe, uncontrollable or sustained cardiovascular condition that, in the Investigator's opinion, may interfere with effective participation in the study
* Previous disorders that may confound the interpretation of the neurological scales
* Drug addiction-related disorders
* Pre existing dementia, when dementia implies a disability, measured as an score of 2 or higher in the previous MRS
* Pre existing medical condition that, in the Investigator's opinion, may interfere with the patient's suitability and participation in the study
* Patients participating in another clinical trial or receiving a non-approved drug (clinical investigational drug) less than 30 days prior to screening
* Patients under current treatment with citicoline
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ferrer Internacional S.A.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Antoni Dávalos, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona (Spain)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Klinikum AltenburgerLand GmbH

Altenburg, , Germany

Site Status

Neurologie EVKB

Bielefeld, , Germany

Site Status

Neurologische Klinik Heinrich-Heine Universität

Düsseldorf, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Erlangen

Erlangen, , Germany

Site Status

Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald

Greifswald, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Neurologische Klinik Universitatsklinikum Heidelberg

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Ingolstadt

Ingolstadt, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Leipzig

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden

Minden, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Großhadern der Universität München

München, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Münster

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Hospital de Sao Jose

Lisbon, Lisbon District, Portugal

Site Status

Hospital de Sao Joao

Porto, Porto District, Portugal

Site Status

Hospital Garcia de Orta, EPE

Almada, , Portugal

Site Status

Hospital Garcia de Orta

Almada, , Portugal

Site Status

Hospital Fernando Fonseca

Amadora - Sintra, , Portugal

Site Status

Hospital Sao Marcos

Braga, , Portugal

Site Status

Hospitais da Universidade Coimbra

Coimbra, , Portugal

Site Status

Centro Hospitalar de Coimbra

Coimbra, , Portugal

Site Status

Hospital de Santa Maria

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Hospital de Santo Antonio

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Hospital Sao Sebastiao

Santa Maria da Feira, , Portugal

Site Status

Centro Hospitalar de Setúbal, EPE

Setúbal, , Portugal

Site Status

Centro Hospitalar de Setúbal

Setúbal, , Portugal

Site Status

Hospital Sao Pedro

Vila Real, , Portugal

Site Status

Hospital General de Albacete

Albacete, Albacete, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Son Dureta

Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol

Badalona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Hospital del Mar

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Sagrat Cor

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Vall d´Hebron

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge

L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Hospital de Mataro

Mataró, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Consorci Hospitalari Parc Tauli

Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Moises Broggi

Sant Joan Despí, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Hospital General Yague

Burgos, Burgos, Spain

Site Status

Hospital San Pedro de Alcantara

Cáceres, Caceres, Spain

Site Status

Hospital de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta

Girona, Girona, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago

Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, Spain

Site Status

Hospital de Leon

León, Leon, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Arnau de Vilanova

Lleida, Lleida, Spain

Site Status

Complejo Hospitalario Xeral Calde

Lugo, Lugo, Spain

Site Status

Hospital de La Princesa

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañon

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Ramon y Cajal

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clinico San Carlos

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario La Paz

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Central de Defensa (del Aire)

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Hospital de Navarra

Pamplona, Navarre, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Meixoeiro

Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Virgen Macarena

Seville, Sevilla, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio

Seville, Sevilla, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora De Valme

Seville, Sevilla, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario La Fe

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clinico Universitario

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital General Universitario de Valencia

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario

Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain

Site Status

Hospital de Cruces

Barakaldo, Vizcaya, Spain

Site Status

Hospital de Basurto

Bilbao, Vizcaya, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova

Lleida, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla

Santander, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla

Santander, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clínico de Valladolid

Valladolid, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany Portugal Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bolland K, Whitehead J, Cobo E, Secades JJ. Evaluation of a sequential global test of improved recovery following stroke as applied to the ICTUS trial of citicoline. Pharm Stat. 2009 Apr-Jun;8(2):136-49. doi: 10.1002/pst.344.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18637642 (View on PubMed)

Davalos A, Alvarez-Sabin J, Castillo J, Diez-Tejedor E, Ferro J, Martinez-Vila E, Serena J, Segura T, Cruz VT, Masjuan J, Cobo E, Secades JJ; International Citicoline Trial on acUte Stroke (ICTUS) trial investigators. Citicoline in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke: an international, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled study (ICTUS trial). Lancet. 2012 Jul 28;380(9839):349-57. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60813-7. Epub 2012 Jun 11.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22691567 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GF-ICTUS-04

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.