Rivaroxaban (10mg) Given Once Daily in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement Compared to Enoxaparin

NCT ID: NCT00329628

Last Updated: 2014-10-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

4541 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-02-28

Study Completion Date

2007-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to assess if 10 mg BAY 59-7939, taken once daily as a tablet, is safe and prevent blood clot which may form after total hip replacement operation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Venous Thromboembolism

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Rivaroxaban (BAY59-7939)

Intervention Type DRUG

10 mg OD tablet of rivaroxaban administered for 36 +/- 4 days

Arm 2

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Enoxaparin

Intervention Type DRUG

Syringe of Enoxaparin active substance at a dose of 40 mg administered for 13 +/- 2 days

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Rivaroxaban (BAY59-7939)

10 mg OD tablet of rivaroxaban administered for 36 +/- 4 days

Intervention Type DRUG

Enoxaparin

Syringe of Enoxaparin active substance at a dose of 40 mg administered for 13 +/- 2 days

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male and female patients aged 18 years or above
* Patients scheduled for elective total hip replacement

Exclusion Criteria

* Planned, staged total bilateral hip replacement
* Active bleeding or high risk of bleeding contraindicating treatment with low molecular weight heparin
* Contraindication listed in the labeling or conditions precluding patient treatment with enoxaparin
* Conditions prohibiting bilateral venography (e.g. amputation of one leg, allergy to contrast media)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bayer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bayer HealthCare AG

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bayer Study Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Bayer

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Northport, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Benton, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Missoula, Montana, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Grapevine, Texas, United States

Site Status

Lubbock, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Avellaneda, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Berazategui, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires F.D., Argentina

Site Status

Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires F.D., Argentina

Site Status

Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires F.D., Argentina

Site Status

Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires F.D., Argentina

Site Status

Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires F.D., Argentina

Site Status

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Wiener Neustadt, Lower Austria, Austria

Site Status

Graz, Styria, Austria

Site Status

Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria

Site Status

Linz, Upper Austria, Austria

Site Status

Linz, Upper Austria, Austria

Site Status

Ried, Upper Austria, Austria

Site Status

Wels, Upper Austria, Austria

Site Status

Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Site Status

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Brasschaat, , Belgium

Site Status

Bruges, , Belgium

Site Status

Genk, , Belgium

Site Status

Hasselt, , Belgium

Site Status

Huy, , Belgium

Site Status

Merksem, , Belgium

Site Status

Pellenberg, , Belgium

Site Status

Reet, , Belgium

Site Status

Roeselare, , Belgium

Site Status

Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Oakville, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Oshawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Peterborough, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Stratford, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Bogotá, , Colombia

Site Status

České Budějovice, , Czechia

Site Status

Hradec Králové, , Czechia

Site Status

Jindřichův Hradec, , Czechia

Site Status

Karlovy Vary, , Czechia

Site Status

Mladá Boleslav, , Czechia

Site Status

Olomouc, , Czechia

Site Status

Pilsen, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Pribram I, , Czechia

Site Status

Prostějov, , Czechia

Site Status

Frederiksberg, , Denmark

Site Status

Hellerup, , Denmark

Site Status

Herlev, , Denmark

Site Status

Hørsholm, , Denmark

Site Status

Silkeborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Jyväskylä, , Finland

Site Status

Mikkeli, , Finland

Site Status

Seinäjoki, , Finland

Site Status

Bois-Guillaume, , France

Site Status

Le Chesnay, , France

Site Status

Liévin, , France

Site Status

Monaco, , France

Site Status

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Saint-Herblain, , France

Site Status

Soyaux, , France

Site Status

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

Vannes, , France

Site Status

Bad Mergentheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Rheinfelden, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Fürth, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Birkenwerder, Brandenburg, Germany

Site Status

Sommerfeld, Brandenburg, Germany

Site Status

Bremen, City state Bremen, Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Marburg, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Wiesbaden, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Rostock, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany

Site Status

Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Witten, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Dresden, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Haidari, Attica, Greece

Site Status

Kifissia, Attica, Greece

Site Status

Kaposvár, Hungary, Hungary

Site Status

Békéscsaba, , Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Győr, , Hungary

Site Status

Kecskemét, , Hungary

Site Status

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Szekszárd, , Hungary

Site Status

Székesfehérvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Beersheba, Israel, Israel

Site Status

Haifa, Israel, Israel

Site Status

Holon, Israel, Israel

Site Status

Kfar Saba, Israel, Israel

Site Status

Petah Tikva, Israel, Israel

Site Status

Tel Aviv, Israel, Israel

Site Status

Ẕerifin, Israel, Israel

Site Status

Tel Litwinsky, , Israel

Site Status

Monza, Milano, Italy

Site Status

Rozzano, Milano, Italy

Site Status

San Donato Milanese, Milano, Italy

Site Status

Gubbio, Perugia, Italy

Site Status

Alghero, Sassari, Italy

Site Status

Busto Arsizio, Varese, Italy

Site Status

Ancona, , Italy

Site Status

Bergamo, , Italy

Site Status

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status

Ferrara, , Italy

Site Status

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

Genova, , Italy

Site Status

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Palermo, , Italy

Site Status

Reggio Emilia, , Italy

Site Status

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Sassari, , Italy

Site Status

Torino, , Italy

Site Status

Varese, , Italy

Site Status

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status

Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico

Site Status

Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico

Site Status

Edo. de Mexico, , Mexico

Site Status

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Hilversum, , Netherlands

Site Status

Hoofddorp, , Netherlands

Site Status

Leiden, , Netherlands

Site Status

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Oss, , Netherlands

Site Status

Zwolle, , Netherlands

Site Status

Baerum Postterminal, , Norway

Site Status

Elverum, , Norway

Site Status

Gjøvik, , Norway

Site Status

Lillehammer, , Norway

Site Status

Notodden, , Norway

Site Status

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Katowice, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Opole, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Sosnowiec, , Poland

Site Status

Szczecin, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Kosice - Saca, Slovakia, Slovakia

Site Status

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Žilina, , Slovakia

Site Status

Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Somerset West, Western Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Worcester, Western Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain

Site Status

Badalona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Castellon, Castellón de La Plana, Spain

Site Status

Jaén, Jaén, Spain

Site Status

Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Pamplona, Pamplona, Spain

Site Status

Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, Spain

Site Status

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Vitoria-Gasteiz, Vitoria, Spain

Site Status

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Halmstad, , Sweden

Site Status

Jönköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Lidköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Varberg, , Sweden

Site Status

Västervik, , Sweden

Site Status

Adana, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Brazil Canada Chile Colombia Czechia Denmark Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Israel Italy Lithuania Mexico Netherlands Norway Poland Slovakia South Africa Spain Sweden Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Eriksson BI, Borris LC, Friedman RJ, Haas S, Huisman MV, Kakkar AK, Bandel TJ, Beckmann H, Muehlhofer E, Misselwitz F, Geerts W; RECORD1 Study Group. Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip arthroplasty. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 26;358(26):2765-75. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0800374.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 18579811 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu

Click here and search for information of Bayer products for Europe

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EudraCT: 2005-004351-35

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

11354

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.