ODiXahip - a Phase IIa Dose Escalating Proof of Principle Trial

NCT ID: NCT00839826

Last Updated: 2014-12-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

641 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-12-31

Study Completion Date

2003-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients undergoing surgery, especially hip and knee surgery, are at high risk for VTE (up to 60 % without prophylaxis). The administration of drugs for thromboprophylaxis, such as heparins, significantly lowers that risk, but heparins have to be applied below the skin (subcutaneously). Additionally, there is a chance of developing a heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (decrease in platelets). Therefore, there is still a need for new agents which are safer and more efficient and which are easier to apply.The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of BAY 59-7939 with the safety and efficacy of the licensed drug Enoxaparin. Enoxaparin, a so-called low molecular heparin, is approved and widely used in the area of thromboprophylaxis and will be given once daily subcutaneously.Another important purpose of the study is to find the optimal dose of BAY 59-7939 for thromboprophylaxis after hip replacement surgery. Therefore, there are several dose steps planned.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Thromboembolism Prevention

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Prevention of Thromboembolism after total hip replacement

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 2

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Enoxaparin

Intervention Type DRUG

40 mg bid

Arm 1

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Rivaroxaban (BAY59-7939)

Intervention Type DRUG

2,5 mg bid,5 mg bid,10mg bid, 20 mg bid, 20 mg tid, 30 mg bid, dose escalation trial

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Rivaroxaban (BAY59-7939)

2,5 mg bid,5 mg bid,10mg bid, 20 mg bid, 20 mg tid, 30 mg bid, dose escalation trial

Intervention Type DRUG

Enoxaparin

40 mg bid

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male patients aged 18 years or above and postmenopausal female patients.
* Patients scheduled for elective primary total hip replacement (cemented or non-cemented prosthesis).
* Patients' written informed consent for participation after receiving detailed written and oral previous information to any study specific procedures.

Exclusion Criteria

* DVT or PE within the previous 6 months prior to study entry.
* Myocardial infarction (MI) or cerebrovascular attack (CVA), TIA or ischaemic stroke within the last 6 months prior to study entry.
* History of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, allergy to heparins.
* Intracerebral or intraocular bleeding within the last 6 months prior to study entry.
* History of gastrointestinal disease with gastrointestinal bleeding within the last 6 months prior to the study.
* History or presence of gastrointestinal disease which could result in an impaired absorption of the study drug
* Amputation of one leg.Related to current symptoms or findings
* Heart insufficiency NYHA III-IV.
* Congenital or acquired haemorrhagic diathesis (PT INR/aPTT not within normal limits).
* Thrombocytopenia (platelets \< 50.000/µl).
* Macroscopic haematuria.
* Allergy to contrast media.
* Severe hypertension (SBP \> 200mmHg, DBP \> 100 mmHg).
* Impaired liver function (transaminases \> 2 x ULN).
* Impaired renal function (serum creatinine \> 1.5 x ULN).
* Active malignant disease.
* Presence of active peptic ulcer or gastrointestinal disease with increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.
* Body weight \< 45 kg.
* Drug- or alcohol abuse.
* Related to current treatment

* Therapy with oral anticoagulants (e.g. phenprocoumon, warfarin-sodium).
* Therapy with acetylic salicylic acid or other thrombocyte aggregation inhibitors (e.g. clopidogrel, dipyridamole and ticlopidine) should be stopped one week before enrolment
* Treatment with heparins or Factor Xa Inhibitors other than study medication.
* All other drugs influencing coagulation, (exception: NSAIDs with half life \< 17 hrs will be allowed).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bayer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bayer Study Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Bayer

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Wiener Neustadt, Lower Austria, Austria

Site Status

Linz, Upper Austria, Austria

Site Status

Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Site Status

Baudour, , Belgium

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Huy, , Belgium

Site Status

Hellerup, , Denmark

Site Status

Herlev, , Denmark

Site Status

Hørsholm, , Denmark

Site Status

Silkeborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Amiens, , France

Site Status

Lille, , France

Site Status

Nancy, , France

Site Status

Rheinfelden, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Fürth, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Dresden, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Site Status

Haifa, Israel, Israel

Site Status

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Tel Litwinsky, , Israel

Site Status

Ẕerifin, , Israel

Site Status

Amersfoort, , Netherlands

Site Status

Zwolle, , Netherlands

Site Status

Notodden, , Norway

Site Status

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Rjukan, , Norway

Site Status

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Jönköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Kungälv, , Sweden

Site Status

London, Greater London, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria Belgium Denmark France Germany Israel Netherlands Norway Poland Sweden United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

10942

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id