Effects of Biphasic Insulin Aspart 70/30 vs. Exenatide in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Not Reaching Blood Glucose Targets on Metformin and a Sulfonylurea.
NCT ID: NCT00313001
Last Updated: 2017-01-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
373 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-04-30
2007-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Safety of Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 in Type 2 Diabetes
NCT01697618
Comparison of Biphasic Insulin Aspart 70/30 With Anti-Diabetic Drugs in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT00097279
Comparison of Biphasic Insulin Aspart 70/30 Versus Insulin Glargine in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT00097877
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 and Biphasic Human Insulin 30 on Blood Sugar Control in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT00807092
Efficacy and Safety of Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 in Combination With Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes
NCT00619697
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
biphasic insulin aspart
exenatide
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* HbA1C: At least 8%
* Patients that were never treated with insulin before
* Current therapy with metformin and a sulfonylurea.
Exclusion Criteria
* Hepatic insufficiency: ALT, AST or alkaline phosphatase \> 2.5 times upper limits of laboratory's normal
* Renal insufficiency: serum creatinine \> 1.3 mg/dL (males) or \> 1.2 mg/dL (females)
* Severe gastrointestinal disease, including gastroparesis
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Novo Nordisk A/S
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Global Clinical Registry (GCR, 1452)
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Novo Nordisk A/S
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Plainsboro, New Jersey, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bergenstal R, Lewin A, Bailey T, Chang D, Gylvin T, Roberts V; NovoLog Mix-vs.-Exenatide Study Group. Efficacy and safety of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 versus exenatide in subjects with type 2 diabetes failing to achieve glycemic control with metformin and a sulfonylurea. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Jan;25(1):65-75. doi: 10.1185/03007990802597951.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Clinical Trials at Novo Nordisk
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BIASP-1714
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.