Comparative Antibiotic Therapy for Subjects With Pulmonary Infiltrates in the ICU

NCT ID: NCT00307099

Last Updated: 2013-06-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

460 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-10-31

Study Completion Date

2007-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will enroll 460 subjects who have new pulmonary infiltrates during their ICU stay and who are at low risk of having pneumonia, as determined using the Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS). The study is designed to determine whether 3 days of antibiotic treatment with meropenem (with or without coverage for MRSA) for ICU subjects diagnosed with new pulmonary infiltrates can reduce the emergence of anti-microbial-resistant organisms and the isolation of a potential pathogen compared to a standard course of antibiotic therapy (minimum of 8 days of therapy with antibiotics of the primary care team's choosing). Subjects will be randomly placed in either the meropenem group or standard antibiotic therapy group. The study will also examine whether short-course therapy reduces hospital length of stay and hospital cost, without having a negative effect on subject morbidity and mortality.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Intensive care units (ICUs) are the most frequently identified source of nosocomial infections within the hospital, with infection rates and antimicrobial resistance rates significantly higher than in the general ward. In one study, antimicrobial use was reported to be 10 times higher in the ICU compared to antimicrobial use in the general ward. Although antibiotics are given for a variety of conditions, antibiotics prescribed for respiratory infections, suspected or proven, account for almost one-half of all antibiotic consumption in the ICU. Importantly, the use of antimicrobial agents has been identified as a critical risk factor in the emergence of resistant bacterial infections. By identifying and focusing on subsets of subjects who are unlikely to have infection and therefore unlikely to benefit from antibiotics, antibiotic use and the subsequent emergence of antimicrobial-resistant organisms could be limited. This is a Phase III, multi-center, randomized, open-label study designed to determine whether 3 days of antibiotic treatment with meropenem (with or without coverage for MRSA) for ICU subjects diagnosed with new pulmonary infiltrates can reduce the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant organisms and the isolation of a potential pathogen compared to a standard course of antibiotic therapy (minimum of 8 days of therapy with antibiotics of the primary care team's choosing). The primary objective of this study is to compare risk of resistant infection in the ICU by evaluating the difference in the incidence of either the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria or the isolation of a potential pathogen in ICU subjects who receive short-course empiric antibiotic therapy to ICU subjects who receive standard antibiotic therapy for the treatment of pulmonary infiltrates (with low likelihood of having pneumonia). Secondary objectives are to: 1) assess the mortality of subjects receiving short-course empiric antibiotic therapy compared to standard antibiotic therapy; 2) assess the ICU length of stay (LOS) in subjects receiving short-course empiric antibiotic therapy compared to standard antibiotic therapy; 3) assess the hospital LOS in subjects receiving short-course empiric antibiotic therapy compared to standard antibiotic therapy; 4) assess the costs of antibiotic therapy in subjects receiving short-course empiric antibiotic therapy compared to standard antibiotic therapy. The costs will be based on ICU LOS, hospital LOS, antibiotic treatment, and standard costs related to the treatment of infection-related adverse experiences; 5) assess the risk of clinically significant infection in subjects receiving short-course empiric antibiotic therapy compared to standard antibiotic therapy. This study will enroll 460 subjects who have new pulmonary infiltrates during their ICU stay and who are at low risk of having pneumonia, as determined using the Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bacterial Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Meropenem

Meropenem 1 gram intravenously every 8 hours for 3 days (9 doses), then an additional 5 days if the Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score is greater than 6.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Meropenem

Intervention Type DRUG

Meropenem 1 gram intravenously every 8 hours for 3 days (9 doses), then an additional 5 days if the Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score is greater than 6.

Standard antibiotic therapy

Standard intravenous antibiotic therapy for a minimum of 8 days.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard antibiotic therapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard intravenous antibiotic therapy for a minimum of 8 days.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Meropenem

Meropenem 1 gram intravenously every 8 hours for 3 days (9 doses), then an additional 5 days if the Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score is greater than 6.

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard antibiotic therapy

Standard intravenous antibiotic therapy for a minimum of 8 days.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Subject, or legal representative, has given written informed consent.
2. Subject has developed a new pulmonary infiltrate after ICU admission (confirmed by radiology).
3. Subject has been hospitalized at least three days.
4. CPIS \</= 6.
5. 18 years of age or older.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Burn patients.
2. Cystic fibrosis patients.
3. Bone marrow or solid organ transplant patients.
4. Neutropenia from any cause (absolute neutophil count (ANC) \</= 500) or likely to become neutropenic within 7 days,
5. Known or suspected Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection (HIV test is not required).
6. Suspected or proven extrapulmonary infection site requiring antibiotic therapy.
7. History of anaphylaxis to penicillin or cephalosporins.
8. History of anaphylaxis to meropenem (any component of the formulation) or other carbapenem (e.g., imipenem).
9. On systemic antibiotics for more than 7 consecutive days during the previous 30 days.
10. Received more than 2 doses of systemic antibiotics within the past 24 hours (other than those used for surgical prophylaxis),

9\. Pregnant or lactating (Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test within the 7 days prior to the first dose of antibiotics).

10\. Unlikely to survive past Day 7 of the study (as determined by the primary care team).

11\. Previous enrollment in this study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

NIH

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Christiana Care Health Services

Newark, Delaware, United States

Site Status

University of Miami

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of Maryland Medical Center

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Washington University in St. Louis

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Saint Patricks Hospital and Health Sciences Center

Missoula, Montana, United States

Site Status

Roswell Park Cancer Institute - Infectious Diseases

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

Akron General Medical Center- Medicine

Akron, Ohio, United States

Site Status

University of Oklahoma

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

South Texas Veterans Health Care System

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BAMSG 4-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

03-216

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The INSPIRE-ASP PNA Trial
NCT03697070 COMPLETED NA