A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Safety and Efficacy of Carboplatin and Paclitaxel Plus or Minus Sorafenib (BAY 43-9006) in Chemonaive Patients With Stage IIIB-IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

NCT ID: NCT00300885

Last Updated: 2014-11-04

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

926 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-02-28

Study Completion Date

2009-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A randomized controlled trial comparing safety and efficacy of carboplatin and paclitaxel plus or minus sorafenib in chemonaive patients with stage III-IV non-small cell lung cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Carcinoma, Non-Small Cell Lung

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sorafenib + C/P

Chemotherapy Phase up to 6 cycles: Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006), \[400 mg orally, twice daily\] on Study Days 2-19 and paclitaxel (P) (200 mg/m2, intravenous (IV)) and carboplatin (C) (area under the curve (AUC) =6 mg/ml\*min-1, IV) on Study Day 1. The cycle duration 21 days. Maintenance Phase: Sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily was administered on Days 1-21 of each 21-day cycle.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Nexavar (Sorafenib, BAY43-9006) + carboplatin + paclitaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

Chemotherapy Phase up to 6 cycles: Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006), \[400 mg orally, twice daily\] on Study Days 2-19 and paclitaxel (P) (200 mg/m2, intravenous (IV)) and carboplatin (C) (area under the curve (AUC) =6 mg/ml\*min-1, IV) on Study Day 1. The cycle duration 21 days. Maintenance Phase: Sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily was administered on Days 1-21 of each 21-day cycle.

Placebo + C/P

Chemotherapy Phase up to 6 cycles: Sorafenib Placebo (2 tablets orally twice daily\] on Study Days 2-19 and paclitaxel (200 mg/m2, intravenous (IV)) and carboplatin (area under the curve (AUC) =6 mg/ml\*min-1, IV) on Study Day 1. The cycle duration 21 days. Maintenance Phase: Sorafenib Placebo 2 tablets orally twice daily was administered on Days 1-21 of each 21-day cycle.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Carboplatin plus Paclitaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

Chemotherapy Phase up to 6 cycles: Sorafenib Placebo (2 tablets orally twice daily\] on Study Days 2-19 and paclitaxel (200 mg/m2, intravenous (IV)) and carboplatin (area under the curve (AUC) =6 mg/ml\*min-1, IV) on Study Day 1. The cycle duration 21 days. Maintenance Phase: Sorafenib Placebo 2 tablets orally twice daily was administered on Days 1-21 of each 21-day cycle.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Nexavar (Sorafenib, BAY43-9006) + carboplatin + paclitaxel

Chemotherapy Phase up to 6 cycles: Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006), \[400 mg orally, twice daily\] on Study Days 2-19 and paclitaxel (P) (200 mg/m2, intravenous (IV)) and carboplatin (C) (area under the curve (AUC) =6 mg/ml\*min-1, IV) on Study Day 1. The cycle duration 21 days. Maintenance Phase: Sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily was administered on Days 1-21 of each 21-day cycle.

Intervention Type DRUG

Carboplatin plus Paclitaxel

Chemotherapy Phase up to 6 cycles: Sorafenib Placebo (2 tablets orally twice daily\] on Study Days 2-19 and paclitaxel (200 mg/m2, intravenous (IV)) and carboplatin (area under the curve (AUC) =6 mg/ml\*min-1, IV) on Study Day 1. The cycle duration 21 days. Maintenance Phase: Sorafenib Placebo 2 tablets orally twice daily was administered on Days 1-21 of each 21-day cycle.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Stage IIIB (with effusion) or Stage IV NSCLC any histology
* No prior chemotherapy
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 or 1
* Greater than or equal to 18 years of age
* Life expectancy at least 12 weeks
* Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior systemic anti cancer therapy
* Known brain metastasis. Patients with neurological symptoms should undergo at computed tomography (CT) scan/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain to exclude brain metastasis
* Pulmonary hemorrhage/bleeding event \> Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 2 within 4 weeks of first dose of study drug
* Thrombotic or embolic events including Transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the past 6 months
* Uncontrolled hypertension
* Any other hemorrhage/bleeding event \> CTCAE Grade 3 within 4 weeks of first dose of study drug
* Major surgery within 4 weeks
* Evidence or history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bayer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bayer Study Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Bayer

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Springdale, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Burbank, California, United States

Site Status

Corona, California, United States

Site Status

Encinitas, California, United States

Site Status

Highland, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Lakeland, Florida, United States

Site Status

Merritt Island, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Savannah, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Skokie, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Skokie, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Kokomo, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Sioux City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Hutchinson, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Pittsfield, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Hattiesburg, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Jefferson City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Morristown, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Staten Island, New York, United States

Site Status

Bismarck, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Dover, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pottsville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Sayre, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Trophy Club, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Abingdon, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Fairfax, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richlands, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

El Palomar - MorĂłn, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Buenos Aires, Ciudad Auton. de Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Rosario, Santa Fe Province, Argentina

Site Status

Capital Federal-Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Santa FĂ©, , Argentina

Site Status

Port Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Frankston, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Bruxelles - Brussel, , Belgium

Site Status

Charleroi, , Belgium

Site Status

La Louvière, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil

Site Status

Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil

Site Status

Salvador, Estado de Bahia, Brazil

Site Status

BrasĂ­lia, Federal District, Brazil

Site Status

Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil

Site Status

Nova Lima, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Site Status

Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil

Site Status

Barretos, SĂŁo Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

JaĂş, SĂŁo Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

RibeirĂŁo Preto, SĂŁo Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Santo André, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

SĂŁo Paulo, SĂŁo Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

SĂŁo Paulo, SĂŁo Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

SĂŁo Paulo, SĂŁo Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

SĂŁo Paulo, SĂŁo Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Sorocaba, SĂŁo Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Belo Horizonte, , Brazil

Site Status

North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Barrie, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Brampton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile

Site Status

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Bobigny, , France

Site Status

Caen, , France

Site Status

Clamart, , France

Site Status

Metz, , France

Site Status

Nancy, , France

Site Status

Nice, , France

Site Status

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Gauting, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

MĂĽnchen, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, City state of Hamburg, Germany

Site Status

Hofheim, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Hemer, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Leverkusen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany

Site Status

GroĂźhansdorf, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany

Site Status

Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Site Status

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Deszk, , Hungary

Site Status

Gyula, , Hungary

Site Status

Mátraháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Törökbálint, , Hungary

Site Status

Orbassano, Torino, Italy

Site Status

Bergamo, , Italy

Site Status

Genova, , Italy

Site Status

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Parma, , Italy

Site Status

Pavia, , Italy

Site Status

Perugia, , Italy

Site Status

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Torino, , Italy

Site Status

Eindhoven, North Brabant, Netherlands

Site Status

Zwolle, , Netherlands

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Olsztyn, , Poland

Site Status

Otwock, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Alicante, Alicante, Spain

Site Status

Elche, Alicante, Spain

Site Status

Zaragoza, Aragon, Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain

Site Status

Zamora, Zamora, Spain

Site Status

Gävle, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Taichung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taoyuan District, , Taiwan

Site Status

Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom

Site Status

Bornemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom

Site Status

Leicester, Leicestershire, United Kingdom

Site Status

London, London, United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Belgium Brazil Canada Chile France Germany Hong Kong Hungary Italy Netherlands Poland Puerto Rico Russia South Korea Spain Sweden Taiwan United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Scagliotti G, Novello S, von Pawel J, Reck M, Pereira JR, Thomas M, Abrao Miziara JE, Balint B, De Marinis F, Keller A, Aren O, Csollak M, Albert I, Barrios CH, Grossi F, Krzakowski M, Cupit L, Cihon F, Dimatteo S, Hanna N. Phase III study of carboplatin and paclitaxel alone or with sorafenib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 10;28(11):1835-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.1321. Epub 2010 Mar 8.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20212250 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu

Click here and search for information of Bayer products for Europe

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2005-005245-19

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

11961

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.