A Clinical Study of the Use of Brushite as Primary Stabilizer in Immediate Dental Implantation
NCT ID: NCT00299585
Last Updated: 2010-01-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
SUSPENDED
PHASE2
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-12-31
2008-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Methods: Forty (40) patients needing dental implants will be treated where needed with "PD" VitalOs Cement gapping half of their sites whereas the other half will be gapped with Bio-oss demineralized bone and BioGuide membrane.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Dental Implant Stability When Using the Densah Bur™ Bone Compaction Process to Prepare Dental Implant Sites
NCT02502058
Closed Sinus Tenting Using Densah Burs Osteotomy Versus Conventional Osteotomy in Localized Pneumatization
NCT05513170
Effects of Bone Graft Placement at Implant Installation on Buccal Plate Stability
NCT01245920
Bone Graft Particle Size on Bone Vitality and Volume
NCT04778709
OSSEODENSIFICATION BY DENSAH BURS WITH ACTIVATED PLASMA ALBUMIN GEL FOR SINUS LIFTING WITH SIMULTANEOUS IMPLANT PLACEMENT
NCT06360263
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
When a bone graft is required the gold standard still widely used is autogenous cancellous bone. However, the graft harvesting procedure is invasive and increases patient morbidity (lengthened surgical procedure, increased risk of infection). Moreover, the availability of autologous grafts is limited, especially in elderly patients. This has been the rationale for studying alternative sources for bone grafts.
The first alternative is allografts: they are usually obtained from cadavers. The advantages include elimination of a patient donor site, hence reduced surgical time and decreased blood loss and risk of infection. The principal shortcomings are the availability, the possible rejection of the graft and the risk of disease transmission.
Grafts of animal origin (xenografts) are also an option, even though not totally risk-free when it comes to disease transmission.
A third alternative to autologous bone is to use synthetic materials. Extensive research has been performed to develop such materials since the 80's. The majority of them are based on calcium phosphate compounds, made up of the same ions as those of the natural mineral phase of bone. These products are readily available, eliminate the risk of disease transmission or immunogenic response (allografts) and bypass the need for an additional surgical procedure (autografts). These materials are presented under either of the three forms: granules, pre-formed blocks or cements.
Granules and pre-formed blocks are generally made up of β-TCP, Hydroxyapatite (HA), or a mix of both. Depending mainly on their chemical composition, their manufacturing process and their porosity, they degrade more or less rapidly.
Calcium phosphate cements consist generally of a liquid and a powder which harden upon mixing. The final product phase can be hydroxyapatite, or another calcium phosphate phase like dahllite or brushite. The advantage of cements over pre-formed blocks is that they can be injected, shaped and hardened in situ, ensuring optimum bone-implant contact and minimally invasive surgery. Once hardened, they exhibit cohesive properties that granules cannot provide. Most of the calcium phosphate cements available on the market are hydroxyapatite cements. However, for some applications like periodontitis or peri-implant gap filling, their resorption rate is too slow, hampering their clinical applicability for these indications. The advantage of the brushite phase in the hardened cement is that it degrades faster than hydroxyapatite, allowing a more rapid bone regeneration. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of "PD" VitalOs Cement as a primary stabilizer and bone augmenting source in dental implantology.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
using "PD" VitalOs Cement with dental implants
supporting dental implants with Vitalos bone cement
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Chemotherapy
* Immune suppressed
* Radiotherapy to head and neck in the last five years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hadassah Medical Organization
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hadassah Medical Organization
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael M Perez Davidi, DMD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Hadassah Medical Organization
Nardi Caspi, DMD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hadassah Medical Organization
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hadassah Medical Organization,
Jerusalem, , Israel
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pittet C, Lemaitre J. Mechanical characterization of brushite cements: a Mohr circles' approach. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;53(6):769-80. doi: 10.1002/1097-4636(2000)53:63.0.co;2-p.
Charriere E, Terrazzoni S, Pittet C, Mordasini PH, Dutoit M, Lemaitre J, Zysset PH. Mechanical characterization of brushite and hydroxyapatite cements. Biomaterials. 2001 Nov;22(21):2937-45. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00041-2.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Michael Perez Davidi
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
191059 HMO-CTIL
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.