Using Informatics to Enhance Care of Older Emergency Department Patients

NCT ID: NCT00297869

Last Updated: 2016-10-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1350 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-01-31

Study Completion Date

2010-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The subjects in this study are physicians working in the Wishard Emergency Department. The purpose of this study is to measure the extent to which information technology (i.e.-computers) improves emergency department care. The objective of our study is to evaluate the use of informatics in the emergency department and specifically to determine if computer reminder systems: 1) reduce the number of unsafe medications prescribed to older adults, 2) assist in more safely dosing of medications to adults of all ages, and 3) increase influenza immunization of eligible older patients in the emergency department.

Interventions: The interventions in this study are computer reminders. When releasing patients from the emergency department, physicians currently write all release orders, including prescriptions, on a computer order entry system that is linked to the Regenstrief Medical Record System. The computerized order entry system will be programmed so that physicians randomized (randomly placed) into the intervention group, the group that will receive the intervention, they will receive one of three types of reminders:

1. The medication prescribed is generally considered unsafe for use in older patients. The reminder will then list appropriate alternatives for this medication.
2. The dose of the prescribed medication is excessive and should be adjusted for the patient's creatinine clearance (or kidney function).
3. This patient may be eligible for influenza vaccination.

The physician will then choose to order or disregard the recommendation. The computer system will automatically record what the physician selected to do. The general outcome of interest is the extent to which the electronic reminders successfully improved physician practice in the emergency department setting. This outcome will be compared to physicians who were randomized to the group that did not receive the reminders (the control group).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Elderly; Renal Insufficiency

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

2

Electronic warnings when providers prescribe a potentially inappropriate medication or an excessively dosed medication (based on estimated creatinine clearance)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Computer-Assisted Decision Support

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Electronic warnings when providers prescribe a potentially inappropriate medication or an excessively dosed medication (based on estimated creatinine clearance)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Computer-Assisted Decision Support

Electronic warnings when providers prescribe a potentially inappropriate medication or an excessively dosed medication (based on estimated creatinine clearance)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The subjects of this study will be physician providers and residents and medical students practicing under the supervision of a faculty emergency physician. Specific study subjects will include emergency medicine faculty physicians; emergency medicine and internal medicine residents; emergency medicine, surgery, and internal medicine interns; and medical students taking care of patients in our emergency department.

Exclusion Criteria

* We will not include the members of the research team in this study.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Indiana University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kevin M. Terrell, DO, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Indiana University School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Wishard Memorial Hospital

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Terrell KM, Perkins AJ, Dexter PR, Hui SL, Callahan CM, Miller DK. Computerized decision support to reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing to older emergency department patients: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Aug;57(8):1388-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02352.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 19549022 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2004 Jahnigen Career Award

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

0311-04B

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.