Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Trial Assessing the Survival Impact of Phone Advice

NCT ID: NCT02934867

Last Updated: 2025-01-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

729 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-10-12

Study Completion Date

2021-10-19

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Medical call center have no phone advice protocol within out of hospital cardiac arrest in France. The purpose of the present study is to compare a group of patients with protocol phone advice delivered by the dispatchers ("CONTARM" group) versus usual phone advice ( "CONTHAB" group). Comparison will be performed on survival to seven days. The hypothesis is that CONTARM group has an higher survival at seven days. A second goal is to measure the survival to 15 and 30 days. The trial is randomized, controlled and will include 2600 patients. The patients will be enrolled in 19 hospitals in France.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CONTARM

Protocol phone advice

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Protocol phone advice

Intervention Type OTHER

Protocol phone advice

CONTHAB

Usual phone advice

Group Type OTHER

Usual phone advice

Intervention Type OTHER

Usual phone advice

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Protocol phone advice

Protocol phone advice

Intervention Type OTHER

Usual phone advice

Usual phone advice

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* \> 18 years old
* initial call to 15
* out of hospital cardiac arrest
* patient proximity to witness

Exclusion Criteria

* first aid professionals on site
* rigor mortis
* location not allowing resuscitation
* inability to realize actions or misunderstanding
* no flow \> 5 minutes
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Central Hospital, Nancy, France

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Metz

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Strasbourg, France

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Reims University hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre Hospitalier de Lons Le Saunier

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Groupe Hospitalier de la Region de Mulhouse et Sud Alsace

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre Hospitalier de Colmar

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre Hospitalier de Troyes

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre Hospitalier de Chalon sur Saône

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Nantes University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Bordeaux

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospices Civils de Lyon

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Poitiers University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Angers

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Orléans

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre Hospitalier de Montauban

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU Angers

Angers, , France

Site Status

CHU Besançon

Besançon, , France

Site Status

CHU Bordeaux

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

CH Châlon sur Saône

Châlon Sur Saône, , France

Site Status

CH Colmar

Colmar, , France

Site Status

CHU Dijon

Dijon, , France

Site Status

CH Lons Le Saunier

Lons-le-Saunier, , France

Site Status

CHU Lyon

Lyon, , France

Site Status

CHU Metz

Metz, , France

Site Status

CH Montauban

Montauban, , France

Site Status

CH Mulhouse

Mulhouse, , France

Site Status

CHU Nancy

Nancy, , France

Site Status

CHU Nantes

Nantes, , France

Site Status

CHU Nîmes

Nîmes, , France

Site Status

CH Orléans

Orléans, , France

Site Status

CHU Poitiers

Poitiers, , France

Site Status

CHU Reims

Reims, , France

Site Status

CHU Strasbourg

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

CH Troyes

Troyes, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Berg RA, Hemphill R, Abella BS, Aufderheide TP, Cave DM, Hazinski MF, Lerner EB, Rea TD, Sayre MR, Swor RA. Part 5: adult basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010 Nov 2;122(18 Suppl 3):S685-705. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970939.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20956221 (View on PubMed)

Nolan JP, Soar J, Zideman DA, Biarent D, Bossaert LL, Deakin C, Koster RW, Wyllie J, Bottiger B; ERC Guidelines Writing Group. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 1. Executive summary. Resuscitation. 2010 Oct;81(10):1219-76. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.021. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20956052 (View on PubMed)

Koster RW, Baubin MA, Bossaert LL, Caballero A, Cassan P, Castren M, Granja C, Handley AJ, Monsieurs KG, Perkins GD, Raffay V, Sandroni C. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 2. Adult basic life support and use of automated external defibrillators. Resuscitation. 2010 Oct;81(10):1277-92. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.009. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20956051 (View on PubMed)

Desmettre T, Jenvrin J, Freysz M, Nace L, Puyraveau M, Berthier F, Dreyfus P, Philippe MH, Labourey JM, Capellier G. Drug prescription at the medical call center. Ann. Fr. Med. Urgence (2013) 3:14-19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Sigaux A, Jonquet S, Puyraveau M, Bretillot L, Labourey JM, Capellier G, Desmettre T. Evaluation of phone advice delivered by a medical call center in case of cardiac arrest. Ann. Fr. Med. Urgence (2014) 4:11-17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CONTAC R/2015/50

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.