Dichotic Listening as a Predictor of Medication Response in Depression
NCT ID: NCT00296725
Last Updated: 2019-05-30
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
25 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
1994-04-30
2011-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Antidepressant Response in the Treatment of Depressive Symptoms and Frailty Characteristics in Older Adults
NCT01973283
Early Prediction of Fluoxetine Response
NCT01075529
Comparing Various Treatments for Achieving and Maintaining Remission of Depression
NCT00227955
Predictors of Cognitive Outcomes in Geriatric Depression
NCT05273996
Repeated Partial Sleep Deprivation to Augment SSRI Response in Depression
NCT01545843
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
SEQUENTIAL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
fluoxetine / Imipramine
fluoxetine or Imipramine
Fluoxetine
Phase 1: Fluoxetine: wk 1: 10 mg/day; wks 2-3: 20 mg/day; wks 4-5: 40 mg/day; wk 6: 60 mg/day; wks 7-12: 80 mg/day \*All increases only if tolerated.
Imipramine
Phase 2: Imipramine wk 1: 25 mg/day; wk 2: 50 mg/day; wk 3: 100 mg/day, 150 mg/day after 3 days; wk 4: 200 mg/day, 250 mg/day after 3 days; wks 5-6: 300 mg/day. \*All increases only if tolerated.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fluoxetine
Phase 1: Fluoxetine: wk 1: 10 mg/day; wks 2-3: 20 mg/day; wks 4-5: 40 mg/day; wk 6: 60 mg/day; wks 7-12: 80 mg/day \*All increases only if tolerated.
Imipramine
Phase 2: Imipramine wk 1: 25 mg/day; wk 2: 50 mg/day; wk 3: 100 mg/day, 150 mg/day after 3 days; wk 4: 200 mg/day, 250 mg/day after 3 days; wks 5-6: 300 mg/day. \*All increases only if tolerated.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Meets Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 4th Edition criteria for current Major Depression, Dysthymia or Depression Not Otherwise Specified
Exclusion Criteria
* Active suicidal ideation (history of suicide attempts will be evaluated on a case by case basis)
* Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 17-item version \> 20
* Current (past six months) alcohol and/or drug abuse or dependence
* Medical condition likely to require intervention contraindicated with study medication (e.g., known arrhythmia likely to be exacerbated by Imipramine)
* Bipolar I
* Psychosis
* If currently taking antidepressants or mood stabilizers, cannot be off psychotropic medication for 7 weeks (10 weeks for Prozac) or felt to require other psychiatric medication (other than occasional sleep or Anxiety medication)
* Premenopausal women not using known effective birth control
* Not currently depressed (whether considered due to current treatment or not)
* Nonresponse to adequate trial of both study medications (i.e., \> 4weeks on \> escitalopram 30 mg/d, and imipramine 200 mg/d); patients having an inadequate response to one study medication could be enrolled and receive the other; patients having responded to an adequate trial of either study medication would be offered a retrial; also excluded will be subjects having non responded to an adequate trial with citalopram (i.e., \> 4 weeks on \> citalopram 60 mg/d)
* Left-handed
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
New York State Psychiatric Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jonathan W Stewart, M.D
Clinical Psychiatrist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jonathan W. Stewart, MD.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
New York State Psychiatric Institute - Columbia University Department of Psychiatry
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Depression Evaluation Service, New York State Psychiatric Institute
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bruder GE, Otto MW, McGrath PJ, Stewart JW, Fava M, Rosenbaum JF, Quitkin FM. Dichotic listening before and after fluoxetine treatment for major depression: relations of laterality to therapeutic response. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1996 Aug;15(2):171-9. doi: 10.1016/0893-133X(95)00180-L.
Bruder GE, Stewart JW, Tenke CE, McGrath PJ, Leite P, Bhattacharya N, Quitkin FM. Electroencephalographic and perceptual asymmetry differences between responders and nonresponders to an SSRI antidepressant. Biol Psychiatry. 2001 Mar 1;49(5):416-25. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(00)01016-7.
Bruder GE, Stewart JW, McGrath PJ, Deliyannides D, Quitkin FM. Dichotic listening tests of functional brain asymmetry predict response to fluoxetine in depressed women and men. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004 Sep;29(9):1752-61. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300519.
Stewart JW, Quitkin FM, McGrath PJ, Bruder GE. Do tricyclic responders have different brain laterality? J Abnorm Psychol. 1999 Nov;108(4):707-10. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.108.4.707.
Bruder GE, Stewart JW, Voglmaier MM, Harrison WM, McGrath P, Tricamo E, Quitkin FM. Cerebral laterality and depression: relations of perceptual asymmetry to outcome of treatment with tricyclic antidepressants. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1990 Feb;3(1):1-10.
Bruder GE, Sedoruk JP, Stewart JW, McGrath PJ, Quitkin FM, Tenke CE. Electroencephalographic alpha measures predict therapeutic response to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant: pre- and post-treatment findings. Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Jun 15;63(12):1171-7. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.10.009. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Depression Evaluation Service - official website
New York State Psychiatric Institute - official website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
continuation of IRB3112;
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
became IRB5294R.
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
#4217R/#5294R
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.