Treatment of Refractory Status Epilepticus

NCT ID: NCT00265616

Last Updated: 2013-04-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

23 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-05-31

Study Completion Date

2010-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether propofol or barbiturates should be preferred in the treatment of status epilepticus (continuous seizure activity) refractory to 2 standard antiepileptic agents.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Refractory status epilepticus (SE) develops in 31%-44% of patients with SE, with a mortality of 16%-23%. Coma induction is advocated for its management. Propofol and barbiturates are the most used agents, but no comparative study has been performed. In consideration of the uncertainty regarding the relative effectiveness, despite several retrospective data, a prospective investigation is needed.

The objective is to assess the effectiveness (SE control, adverse events) of a first course of propofol versus barbiturates in the treatment of refractory SE, in adults with refractory SE not due to cerebral anoxia.

Comparison: Coma induction with standardized doses of propofol or barbiturates titrated towards burst-suppression on EEG, then assessment of the proportion of patients achieving a control of SE.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Status Epilepticus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

propofol, 2mg/kg as bolus, then titrated up to EEG burst-suppression as a continuous infusion; no maximum doses defined

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

liquid, mg/kg.h, titrated after EEG

2

thiopental/pentobarbital, 2mg/kg as bolus, then titrated up to EEG burst-suppression as a continuous infusion; no maximum doses defined

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

thiopental/pentobarbital

Intervention Type DRUG

liquid, mg/kg.h, titrated after EEG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

propofol

liquid, mg/kg.h, titrated after EEG

Intervention Type DRUG

thiopental/pentobarbital

liquid, mg/kg.h, titrated after EEG

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Disoprivan Pentotal /Thiopentone

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with refractory status epilepticus not due to cerebral anoxia, needing coma induction for clinical management.

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \< 16 years old.
* Known pregnancy.
* Cerebral anoxia as SE etiology.
* Epilepsia partialis continua (simple partial SE).
* Known intolerance to the study drugs.
* Known mitochondrial disorder, hyperlipidemia, or significant rhabdomyolysis.
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Brigham and Women's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Andrea O. Rossetti, MD

Dr

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrea O. Rossetti, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

BrighamHospital/CHUV

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Inselspital

Bern, Canton of Bern, Switzerland

Site Status

CHUV

Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland

Site Status

Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève

Geneva, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rossetti AO, Milligan TA, Vulliemoz S, Michaelides C, Bertschi M, Lee JW. A randomized trial for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care. 2011 Feb;14(1):4-10. doi: 10.1007/s12028-010-9445-z.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20878265 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RSE study, protocol#62/06

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Intermittent Fasting in Refractory Epilepsy
NCT02311023 TERMINATED PHASE2
Buspirone Therapy for Localized Epilepsy
NCT01496612 TERMINATED PHASE2